|
Jhyrbian | Mon 29-Jun-15 04:28 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
919 posts
| |
|
#59847, "Defenses"
|
Is it possible to change defenses so you have a chance to learn on being hit instead of no chance at all on lower mobs? If a lower level mob is whooping your ass, you should be able to learn something. It's way too beneficial to stop and spam prac defenses as a lowbie since it becomes way harder to do once you level past a certain point. Thoughts? #### you jhyrb? Anyone?
|
|
|
|
Lower level mobs are far from no chance at all.,
KaguMaru,
29-Jun-15 05:44 PM, #2
RE: Lower level mobs are far from no chance at all.,
Jhyrbian,
29-Jun-15 05:58 PM, #3
Nah, you can.,
Destuvius,
29-Jun-15 06:58 PM, #4
Update!,
Destuvius,
30-Jun-15 10:08 AM, #5
RE: Update!,
Jhyrbian,
30-Jun-15 11:21 AM, #6
i asked this a long time ago.,
Dallevian,
29-Jun-15 05:06 PM, #1
| |
|
KaguMaru | Mon 29-Jun-15 05:44 PM |
Member since 15th Sep 2012
805 posts
| |
|
#59851, "Lower level mobs are far from no chance at all."
In response to Reply #0
|
Skill learn chances don't disappear the way experience does, despite everyone acting like they do.I've had tons of skill gains from little finger mobs. Admittedly not with defense spamming since if I do it, I do it at level 15, but yeah.
|
|
|
|
  |
Jhyrbian | Mon 29-Jun-15 05:58 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
919 posts
| |
|
#59852, "RE: Lower level mobs are far from no chance at all."
In response to Reply #2
|
I'm pretty sure for defenses, it's no chance at all, you can do other skills still.
|
|
|
|
        |
Jhyrbian | Tue 30-Jun-15 11:21 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
919 posts
| |
|
#59886, "RE: Update!"
In response to Reply #5
|
Well, you can certainly try, you just won't get anywhere! Can we maybe discuss changing that? It doesn't even have to be normal improve rates, just on hits that actually hit you. Anything would be better than forcing us to grind it out as lowbies.
|
|
|
|
|
Dallevian | Mon 29-Jun-15 05:06 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1650 posts
| |
|
#59848, "i asked this a long time ago."
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|