|
Dallevian | Wed 23-Jul-14 01:20 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#56066, "Do the imms give a rip about Nexus?"
|
I've played Nexus in and out for about 5 years (not overly successful, mostly rageful) and here are some observations:
- no imm led quests, not a one - the only immteraction is generally religion oriented - you're more likely to get immteraction from another cabal's imm than nexus itself (see Thror and Iklahn) - no one seems to care or advocate for nexus outside of a few long-lived shifters
There have been a few heroimms in nexus that helped 'keep things in line', but really they were mostly dominating the freedom of nexus with their own perspective ("roleplay"). Luckily they've moved on or graduated to other things.
Bond is still underwhelming, all things considered. It isn't that great for ranking bonded, it's kind of annoying to use with certain classes, and it mostly only shines with shifter/warrior. I know, that's probably not fair to say, but it's frustrating enough trying to find someone to bond with that the skill is underwhelming because of that rarity.
Not only that but the skills are so lame compared to the other cabals. Detect invis is good for melee, and vanguard can be ok, but it's so easy to game vanguard as a rager or if going against the grain for the dam redux, a nexun will simply be ganked. Not only that, but vanguard working less when the veil is super duper thick seems so freaking contrary to the entire premise of it all.
So really, does anyone give a crap about nexus? Or is just going to idle along full of wasted potential?
|
|
|
|
RE: Do the imms give a rip about Nexus?,
Daevryn,
24-Jul-14 07:00 PM, #10
sure. but my question/comment wasn't really about powe...,
Dallevian,
24-Jul-14 09:05 PM, #13
I am waiting for the thug thief + invoker perma,
laxman,
25-Jul-14 08:31 AM, #16
Nexus powers are awesome - vanguard especially,
Sarien,
25-Jul-14 08:40 AM, #18
From the Outside Looking In,
Destuvius,
23-Jul-14 02:52 PM, #5
i believe it already functions that way. nt,
Dallevian,
23-Jul-14 03:00 PM, #6
They should get rid of Nexus,
Moligant,
23-Jul-14 02:24 PM, #3
The only minor tweaks I would make,
Bemused,
24-Jul-14 07:12 PM, #11
Meh,
Lokain,
23-Aug-14 07:28 PM, #20
If anything, Bond could use a small boost.,
Zephon,
23-Jul-14 02:22 PM, #2
Powers seemed ok to me,
incognito,
23-Jul-14 01:50 PM, #1
conjurer and shifter bond, yes,
Dallevian,
23-Jul-14 02:25 PM, #4
It's good to have a cabal for those players,
Murphy,
24-Jul-14 10:42 AM, #7
I dont get it.,
Zephon,
24-Jul-14 12:04 PM, #8
Tongue-in-cheek bro.,
Murphy,
24-Jul-14 12:55 PM, #9
You need to really lay it on thick.,
Zephon,
24-Jul-14 08:48 PM, #12
Ok, I'll use the sarcasm sign next time.,
Murphy,
24-Jul-14 10:26 PM, #14
Are you sure vanguard fluctuates with the veil?,
jalbrin,
25-Jul-14 06:10 AM, #15
It does,
Rayihn,
25-Jul-14 08:34 AM, #17
RE: Are you sure vanguard fluctuates with the veil?,
Jaegendar,
25-Jul-14 12:14 PM, #19
| |
|
Daevryn | Thu 24-Jul-14 07:00 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#56080, "RE: Do the imms give a rip about Nexus?"
In response to Reply #0
|
You and I have always disagreed about the quality of the Nexus powers and I'm not sure what else to say about that, other than I'm not sure how you get from "This person thinks the powers are better than I do" to what you're saying here.
|
|
|
|
  |
Dallevian | Thu 24-Jul-14 09:05 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#56083, "sure. but my question/comment wasn't really about powe..."
In response to Reply #10
|
it was more about nexus imm activity and lack of it.
serious question though: have you ever played a hero nexus?
|
|
|
|
  |
laxman | Fri 25-Jul-14 08:31 AM |
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
| |
|
#56087, "I am waiting for the thug thief + invoker perma"
In response to Reply #10
|
Combining hide/sneak with trip/cheapshot quicksand, dispel magic, circle, shields, backstab, blackjack, and invoker damage output... scary on so so so so so so many levels.
Lone target scenario hide/sneak walk up to them and blackjack. Make quicksand dispel flight, open with backstab follow with damage spells and trip, 3 rounds later get all corpse.
Groups target scenario hide/sneak walk up to them and invoker starts blasting area spells, thief circle stabs to pick off the targets without high DR in a couple of rounds and revert to dispel magic, trip/cheap shot, parting block to seal the last fellow.
Group vs group combat going on scenario. Patiently wait hidden and then nuke everyone with area damage when they are wounded, thief uses their skills to pick off straglers as they try and escape.
|
|
|
|
  |
Dallevian | Wed 23-Jul-14 03:00 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#56073, "i believe it already functions that way. nt"
In response to Reply #5
|
|
|
|
Moligant | Wed 23-Jul-14 02:24 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
327 posts
| |
|
#56069, "They should get rid of Nexus"
In response to Reply #0
|
I'm a big advocate for having less cabals seeing as we have less players to accomadate so many cabals. Of all the cabals we have the Nexuns (and Scions) contribute the least to CF as a whole due to limiting factors that dont open them up very well to the general playerbase.
1. Nexuns protect Balance.
The problem with that whole idea is that after having played a nexun and asked nexuns innumerable times about the state of balance, Thera is typically balanced. This means for large periods of time the cabal serves no real purpose except to fight Villagers.
2. Low Playerbase
The low playerbase means that (imho) instead of serving balance, the nexus cabal in actuality suddenly swerves balance in the other direction so to speak.
For example if my cabal is holding a couple items and is 'unbalancing' Thera but my cabal only has one or two protectors is it really 'balanced' for a hit squad (at times) of two or three hero nexuns along with a couple of the actual enemies of your cabal whose item you are holding to show up and it is now a five vs. two fight?
3. Scions are nearly non-existent. Why do we need them again?
|
|
|
|
  |
Bemused | Thu 24-Jul-14 07:12 PM |
Member since 15th Oct 2013
665 posts
| |
|
#56081, "The only minor tweaks I would make"
In response to Reply #3
|
Abandon the following Cabals:
- Nexus - Tribunal - Scion - Empire - Fortress
Re-introduce the following Cabals:
- Masters - Entropy - Shadow - Knights - Arbiters
(Outlander/Scarab/Ragers remain as is)
Like I say; only minor tweaks but it would bring a lot of people back out of retirement.
|
|
|
|
    |
Lokain | Sat 23-Aug-14 07:28 PM |
Member since 03rd Jul 2009
173 posts
| |
|
#56340, "Meh"
In response to Reply #11
|
|
|
|
Zephon | Wed 23-Jul-14 02:22 PM |
Member since 21st Mar 2007
488 posts
| |
|
#56068, "If anything, Bond could use a small boost."
In response to Reply #0
|
The power sharing between the individuals should continue for a few ticks maybe 3ish without their bond partner at their side. After 3 consecutive rounds without the bond partner beside them the bond breaks.
Alternatively, it could be made area wide instead of room wide for the bond to work...
I'm not sure how easy of an addition it might be.
The question is if the imms feel there is a need for the change. Additional incentive to actually use bond instead of "lone wolfing" it with vanguard. Unless things have changed since I last played Nexus, accidentally stepping out of a room from your bond-mate sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
incognito | Wed 23-Jul-14 01:50 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#56067, "Powers seemed ok to me"
In response to Reply #0
|
Bond was nice as both an assassin and as a ranger, for both me and bond mate. I'd assume similar is true of a thief too.
And with my warrior I found vanguard really useful for dealing with outlanders at the refuge.
|
|
|
|
  |
Dallevian | Wed 23-Jul-14 02:25 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#56070, "conjurer and shifter bond, yes"
In response to Reply #1
|
others pretty much suck compared to all other cabals. vanguard still sucks in the grand scheme of things, it shines in a few scenarios though (ambush, sometimes deathblow if the veil isn't too thick, damage redux if fighting against 2 or more veil swings).
but who wants to fight bonded? it's better to get the buffs, break bond, and go solo with vanguard if fighting against the grain or fighting ragers because of deathblow. that's what most hero nexuns do already outside of a few scenarios (offense shifter + sword warrior).
but cabal powers wasn't the biggest point: biggest point is nexus just being the cabal of neglect.
|
|
|
|
    |
Murphy | Thu 24-Jul-14 10:42 AM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#56077, "It's good to have a cabal for those players"
In response to Reply #4
|
who just want to be left alone and play without depending on imms.
Since word on the street is that Empire no longer fulfills that role.
|
|
|
|
      |
Zephon | Thu 24-Jul-14 12:04 PM |
Member since 21st Mar 2007
488 posts
| |
|
#56078, "I dont get it."
In response to Reply #7
|
What exactly are you saying here?
Empire has auto-induction (bloodoath). While people are complaining that auto-induction does not let neutrals or goods get inducted, it is still automated.
Has auto-boost to the lowest echelon(shadow dweller, divine voice, etc) as long as they meet requirements.
Then relies on cabal politics to get you boosted to the next tiers above (from what I understand). Not that I play Empire much.
Even the imperial voting system is mostly automated. It is just initiation that is not (again, from what I've read).
I do not see where that equates to "depending on imms".
|
|
|
|
        |
Murphy | Thu 24-Jul-14 12:55 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#56079, "Tongue-in-cheek bro."
In response to Reply #8
|
Empire is a player-run cabal, as is Nexus.
However, a few people recently complained that Empire is no longer player-run because Destuvius pokes his nose everywhere
So I suggest that, for those people, there is still Nexus.
|
|
|
|
          |
Zephon | Thu 24-Jul-14 08:48 PM |
Member since 21st Mar 2007
488 posts
| |
|
#56082, "You need to really lay it on thick."
In response to Reply #9
|
I cannot pull the joking tone from your posts.
|
|
|
|
            |
Murphy | Thu 24-Jul-14 10:26 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#56084, "Ok, I'll use the sarcasm sign next time."
In response to Reply #12
|
|
|
    |
jalbrin | Fri 25-Jul-14 06:10 AM |
Member since 20th Apr 2009
211 posts
| |
|
#56085, "Are you sure vanguard fluctuates with the veil?"
In response to Reply #4
|
That sounds a bit like that myth that was believed for years that deathblow and resistance did the same.
You're right about bond, though. My last nexun shifter was the only hero one in the cabal at the time, and the warriors passed me around so much that I felt like a whore.
|
|
|
|
      |
Rayihn | Fri 25-Jul-14 08:34 AM |
Member since 08th Oct 2006
1147 posts
| |
|
#56088, "It does"
In response to Reply #15
|
fluctuate somewhat with the veil. Not as extreme as with good/evil law/chaos, iirc, but the veil does affect it.
|
|
|
|
      |
Jaegendar | Fri 25-Jul-14 12:14 PM |
Member since 30th May 2014
136 posts
| |
|
#56090, "RE: Are you sure vanguard fluctuates with the veil?"
In response to Reply #15
|
> >You're right about bond, though. My last nexun shifter was the >only hero one in the cabal at the time, and the warriors >passed me around so much that I felt like a whore.
Someone needs to put this guy's comment on facebook ASAP, could the imm that runs the facebook page please do the honors?.
This one is priceless.
I worked out yesterday and I hurt all over today, and this guy just brought tears of pain to my eyes after all the snickering.
|
|
|
|
|