|
Dallevian | Thu 13-Feb-14 04:28 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#54182, "Targeted disarm edge."
|
How about an edge that let's you target disarm so you can disarm someone you're not tanking but are in combat with?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54196, "RE: Targeted disarm edge."
In response to Reply #0
|
I can't help but dislike an edge that gives an advantage to a ganking squad over the one being ganked. The one being ganked can always just hit target then disarm.
|
|
|
|
  |
Dallevian | Fri 14-Feb-14 12:51 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#54198, "I think you misread?"
In response to Reply #2
|
It doesn't give an advantage to the gank squad, it gives the advantage to the solo person.
|
|
|
|
    |
|
#54199, "RE: I think you misread?"
In response to Reply #3
|
Perhaps not misread, but interpreted differently? As it reads - "you're not tanking but are in combat with". If you are not tanking them but you are in combat with them you are in the gank squad, not being ganked. If you were being ganked, you would be tanking all of them so you could simply redirect by using hit then disarm. I could be convinced (not that I particularly matter) if it was "you're tanking but not hitting them".
Obviously for group vs group battles, this becomes convoluted.
|
|
|
|
      |
Dallevian | Fri 14-Feb-14 12:59 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#54200, "gotcha"
In response to Reply #4
|
point being, you can disarm someone that is fighting you but you are not targeting though they are targeting you
|
|
|
|
|
TJHuron | Thu 13-Feb-14 05:42 PM |
Member since 28th Nov 2007
1132 posts
| |
|
#54183, "Thats a neat idea nt"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|