|
Moligant | Mon 30-Sep-13 03:02 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
327 posts
| |
|
#51865, "Any plans for a Sahuagin seasonal race?"
|
Just thought a water-based race more adept in the water than storm-giants would be cool.
Few ideas...
Unable to naturally breathe air but perhaps has an 'inherent' ability they can activate that allows for short periods of breathing on the surface and instead of drowning like vice cversa, they get an 'asphyxiate' effect that lasts until they either use the ability again or get underwater.
This would allow for them to play above ground with an eye to their natural limitations while above ground.
Able to naturally camo while in water and see other camoed people in water.
Immune to water-based attacks. Or highly resistent at the least.
Ram (inherent) - a modification of bash that works underwater but instead of knocking a person down, this attack is based on creatures like dolphins who will ram themselves into a target. It stuns the person momentarily and can knock the wind out of someone who isn't naturally adapted to fighting underwater causing (if this can be done) the timer on whatever is allowing them to breathe underwater to be lowered each time this is successful (not every ram, just when the extra 'air knocked out of them' message goes through. Wouldn't work against storm giants or water forms obviously.
Class choices could be mariner ranger, shaman, or warrior (assuming they don't have their own class/race like goblins/orcs)
I would make them about the same size as a dwarf.
Who knows about stats but i'd think
str 20 (being underwater should make them strong)
dex (in water - 25) (on land - 18) Should take a hit on land to speed, etc. but be better than most underwater
char: 15 they are big ugly fish like things after all.
Wis: 20
Int: 18
Con: 20
|
|
|
|
Refined idea,
Moligant,
18-Jul-14 02:11 PM, #8
skill/ability ideas,
Moligant,
18-Jul-14 02:57 PM, #9
boot n/t,
Moligant,
18-Jul-14 01:29 PM, #5
Booooring,
Tsunami,
18-Jul-14 01:52 PM, #7
RE: Any plans for a Sahuagin seasonal race?,
Scarabaeus,
30-Sep-13 03:56 PM, #2
Think it would be very cool even with restrictions,
Moligant,
30-Sep-13 04:21 PM, #4
RE: Think it would be very cool even with restrictions,
Cleauseau,
22-Jul-14 05:28 PM, #22
Back in the day...,
Moligant,
23-Jul-14 01:03 PM, #30
Cabal interaction,
Moligant,
18-Jul-14 01:33 PM, #6
Mmmmm , pirate cabal,
Falstaff,
20-Jul-14 11:50 AM, #10
Bigger oceans...why hasnt this happened?,
Moligant,
20-Jul-14 01:47 PM, #11
RE: Bigger oceans...why hasnt this happened?,
Falstaff,
20-Jul-14 02:10 PM, #12
RE: More water areas,
Valguarnera,
20-Jul-14 02:32 PM, #13
Let's make a deal?,
Moligant,
21-Jul-14 01:51 AM, #14
RE: Let's make a deal?,
Destuvius,
23-Jul-14 02:48 PM, #31
Sure...,
Moligant,
23-Jul-14 04:36 PM, #32
Let's make a deal?,
Moligant,
21-Jul-14 01:51 AM, #15
Water area ideas,
Moligant,
21-Jul-14 02:47 PM, #16
Another addition to your reasons.,
Kalageadon,
21-Jul-14 04:55 PM, #17
Voralia's tears should flood out Eastern occasionally,
Sertius,
21-Jul-14 08:25 PM, #18
It can turn the rooms to swamp temporarily. nt,
Scrimbul,
22-Jul-14 08:03 AM, #19
Not that I'm averse to more water areas,
incognito,
22-Jul-14 01:41 PM, #20
Sink Seantryn,
Tsunami,
22-Jul-14 03:31 PM, #21
Theran rivers never reach the sea...,
Cleauseau,
22-Jul-14 05:32 PM, #23
RE: Theran rivers never reach the sea...,
Moligant,
22-Jul-14 08:31 PM, #24
RE: Theran rivers never reach the sea...,
Moligant,
22-Jul-14 08:33 PM, #25
Khalid?,
Scarabaeus,
23-Jul-14 07:11 AM, #26
As does,
incognito,
23-Jul-14 07:20 AM, #27
Jaheira?,
Tsunami,
23-Jul-14 08:09 AM, #28
BG2 reference? Nice.,
Zephon,
23-Jul-14 11:38 AM, #29
Jump on my sword while you can, evil--I won't be as gen...,
Scarabaeus,
23-Jul-14 09:13 PM, #33
Merfolk?,
Pendragon_Surtr,
06-Oct-14 10:32 AM, #34
Are you intentionally reviving these old ass threads on...,
Sarien,
06-Oct-14 10:37 AM, #35
Sorry, not intentionally,
Pendragon_Surtr,
06-Oct-14 11:04 AM, #36
No problem!,
Sarien,
06-Oct-14 01:14 PM, #37
RE: Merfolk?,
Scarabaeus,
07-Oct-14 09:32 PM, #38
AWWWW, there goes my idea for a mermaid named Daryl,
Pendragon_Surtr,
07-Oct-14 10:47 PM, #39
RE: Any plans for a Sahuagin seasonal race?,
Eskelian,
30-Sep-13 03:37 PM, #1
Just more options please. EDIT =Meant to be under Scara...,
Frequentplayer,
30-Sep-13 04:17 PM, #3
| |
|
Moligant | Fri 18-Jul-14 02:11 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
327 posts
| |
|
#56027, "Refined idea"
In response to Reply #0
|
I'd make this race like orcs/goblins as a combo race/class. Fitting them into current classes I think would take away from their uniqueness as well as requiring thought to how their water-based physiology works with classes based around operating on land.
In terms of the inherent 'air-breathing' ability I would require that it lasts roughly 100 hrs and then the 'asphyxiate' effect takes hold and the sahugain would then have to get back underwater before being able to call upon that inherent again. On top of this I'd have a reverse of the 'fear' thing that arials/dwarves/felar get while they are on land (once their 'air-breathing' inherent wears off) and they need to stay underwater for a few hours before venturing back onto land once they can make it underwater.
This would keep them tied a bit tighter to water by giving them a major ongoing penalty to being on land for extended periods. However I don't see it as SO bad seeing as many areas are not far from at least one underwater area or room and 100 hrs is plenty of time for quick exploration/gear gathering.
I agree with the other posters suggestion that they be able to see camo (underwater-only) but be unable to camo underwater except for possessing that ability as a skill only a specific division of the class/race has (like orc adaptations).
I agree to a lightning vuln as a good idea.
I think my 'Ram' idea is still a good one.
As a compromise to the idea of a 'flat' dex, I think they should have a flat 25 dex but while on land they get slapped with an effect that costs them -7 dex on land but this can be covered by equipment.
If I think of specific skills I'll write them up in a seperate part of this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Moligant | Fri 18-Jul-14 01:29 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
327 posts
| |
|
#56023, "boot n/t"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
  |
Tsunami | Fri 18-Jul-14 01:52 PM |
Member since 25th Mar 2008
1509 posts
| |
|
#56026, "Booooring"
In response to Reply #5
|
|
|
  |
Moligant | Mon 30-Sep-13 04:21 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
327 posts
| |
|
#51869, "Think it would be very cool even with restrictions"
In response to Reply #2
|
Especially if there are any water-areas in the works to boot. However lots of CF is underwater already when you think about it, Open seas, The Underdark lake, all the rivers, maybe throw a few more things in western aryth to rank on, spirits, etc. I wouldn't go water only, but slow on land is whjat I was thinking.
I would play it just to get my water-exploration on in 'relative' safety.
|
|
|
|
    |
Cleauseau | Tue 22-Jul-14 05:28 PM |
Member since 22nd Feb 2014
40 posts
| |
|
#56056, "RE: Think it would be very cool even with restrictions"
In response to Reply #4
|
Got a laugh with the thought of putting the refuge under water. Storm rangers would be the new in thing and a bunch of pie eyed and bedraggled felar walking around in complete disconsolation.
|
|
|
|
      |
Moligant | Wed 23-Jul-14 12:31 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
327 posts
| |
|
#56065, "Back in the day..."
In response to Reply #22
Edited on Wed 23-Jul-14 01:03 PM
|
The Warlocks (goodie magic cabal) was located on Western Aryth. It wasn't underwater but you had to cross alot of water to get to it. Heydey of the watershifters if I remember correctly. Great for invokers too...it was invokers back then that could destroy your boat I think....anyways I always figured thats why they closed it, probably too many complaints. I personally loved that location and still consider it to be the best cabal location ever. All sorts of wars went down outside that tower.
I forget if the entrance where the guard mob had to be was water as well. Once inside you were on solid ground though for sure. I'd love to see the Imms bring something back like that.
EDITED TO ADD:
Just reminiscing...I played as a Warlock and as a Villager up against the Warlocks and even as their enemies I honestly believe that location brought out the best in the Villagers because when you went there you had to mean business. You couldn't sneak up on them, they had advantages on water, it was just a blast.
|
|
|
|
    |
Moligant | Sun 20-Jul-14 01:47 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
327 posts
| |
|
#56044, "Bigger oceans...why hasnt this happened?"
In response to Reply #10
|
I agree, especially now that I think about it...why not make it even more viable by simply making the oceans alot bigger? It shouldn't be that hard to double the size of the oceans like open sea and aryth by adding a bunch of empty rooms right? OR you could make crossing them a bit more hard by making parts of them 'maze' rooms like once you get about to the middle of them.
When you think about the kind of medieval setting CF takes place in, crossing the ocean should be one of the hardest things you can do. So maybe not make it 'hard' (because its hard to find people as is) but at least a bit longer to do then throw in these sahugain, maybe expand an area underwater (taking advantage of creating more surface area ocean) for more mid-level adventuring and you could see as much activity on water as on land.
|
|
|
|
      |
Valguarnera | Sun 20-Jul-14 02:32 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
| |
|
#56046, "RE: More water areas"
In response to Reply #11
|
I'm generally in favor of more water areas. Their relative lack makes it really hard make water shifters both balanced and interesting, marginalizes abilities that depend on water, etc. Right now, a heavily aquatic race (more so than storm giants) would be sort of pointless-- you'd have to downplay their aquatic-ness heavily to keep them playable across the other 80-90% of Thera, and at that point why are we doing this?
Couple reasons more water areas haven't happened: 1) Low author interest. For whatever reason, people haven't been too excited about generating this content. It's not practical for the area team to force authors to write about things they don't want to write about.
2) Tricky to integrate. It wouldn't make a heck of a lot of sense to just wedge them between existing areas, and you'd have to rewrite a lot of room on either side for the aesthetics to match. On the flip side, unless the water areas 'bridge' higher-traffic areas, it's easy to avoid water shifters (etc.) by just not going to those places.
3) Boringness. Adding 100 rooms of repetitive, open-floorplan ocean nothingness is filler content. Really, I'd want to see some deep lakes, underground rivers, etc. with interesting NPCs, treasure, etc. that would fill multiple roles.
valguarnera@carrionfields.com
|
|
|
|
          | |
            | |
        |
Moligant | Mon 21-Jul-14 02:40 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
327 posts
| |
|
#56049, "Water area ideas"
In response to Reply #13
Edited on Mon 21-Jul-14 02:47 PM
|
1. Expand Aryth create a 'war-zone' where Sahuagain are fighting those Triton below water. Blood-tinged waters, sea monsters being sicced on each side of the conflict.
2. Expand sea of despair, throw in a whole other underwater city as the main home of the sahugain and the current one (the spirits) serve as the outskirts of that city.
3. Create a few 'waterholes' By water holes I mean spots as you mentioned - Deep lakes and such off the rivers and allow this to create more 'connective tissue' between the major oceans.
For example...maybe a lake in ugruts that connects via an underground river to that pond in holy grove. Create underwater offshoots beneath voralias tears that connect parts of that river to sea of despair and open sea via that area north of eastern crossroads. Maybe throw a lake in there as well.
Once you can go from open sea to sea of despair underwater, that is a big deal. A few good treasures (ive already thought of two) and you can drive traffic with loot and wands and cabal locations.
Oh...does CF have a Kraken? We could have a Kraken!
As for explanations, easy - the sahugain have secretly been building tunnels throughout theran rivers to try and expand their influence as part of a planned large-scale invasion on the Tritons. Maybe in co-operation with the Empire (Sahugain society being lawful evil).
|
|
|
|
        |
Kalageadon | Mon 21-Jul-14 04:55 PM |
Member since 23rd Oct 2003
1049 posts
| |
|
#56050, "Another addition to your reasons."
In response to Reply #13
|
Water areas are hard to effectively use for ranking/exploring now that they aren't wilderness. That means that Rangers(Except Mariners) and Druids aim elsewhere, and I was told Outlanders too. I suppose this may fall under your #1 because it may sap motivation/interest.
|
|
|
|
        |
Sertius | Mon 21-Jul-14 08:25 PM |
Member since 17th Nov 2008
360 posts
| |
|
#56051, "Voralia's tears should flood out Eastern occasionally"
In response to Reply #13
|
Every once and again, the river should expand to cover ten or so rooms on Eastern, including the Large Crossroads and maybe a few adjacent rooms in the appropriate surrounding areas.
That would probably make water shifters and mariners something worth talking about.
Shouldn't be that hard to write I don't think. If it automatically happens and the water stays for a while before drying out, all the better. Could at least give it a try in a straight sub of 10-15 Eastern Road rooms to Flooded Eastern rooms.
|
|
|
|
          | |
        |
incognito | Tue 22-Jul-14 01:41 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#56053, "Not that I'm averse to more water areas"
In response to Reply #13
|
But that would be a reduction in thief and assassin power. Possibly ranger power too.
Essentially you could look at who is on and pick a route they can't ambush you on.
Also, for chars in general, finding people underwater would be tough as moving through water is pretty draining on moves.
Ranking would be low risk because by and large you can't be lagged underwater by most chars.
That said, I would love it if we had more of an underwater world.
|
|
|
|
          |
Tsunami | Tue 22-Jul-14 03:31 PM |
Member since 25th Mar 2008
1509 posts
| |
|
#56055, "Sink Seantryn"
In response to Reply #20
|
Glymarach magicked something awful while trying to be the dragon.
Every mob becomes a ghost and every room becomes water. hohoho
|
|
|
|
        |
Cleauseau | Tue 22-Jul-14 05:32 PM |
Member since 22nd Feb 2014
40 posts
| |
|
#56057, "Theran rivers never reach the sea..."
In response to Reply #13
|
It would be too much coding and area redo to be possible but having all of the major rivers run into the sea with deep water in the largest rivers. The new water highways of Thera. Yeah.. No.
|
|
|
|
          |
Moligant | Tue 22-Jul-14 08:31 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
327 posts
| |
|
#56058, "RE: Theran rivers never reach the sea..."
In response to Reply #23
|
Which doesn't really make sense when you think about it.
And it would take some serious re-writing but I'm fairly sure it could be done without coding anything. Rewrite a few rooms so that the rivers actually connect to the seas...not major. As Valg pointed out the major issue is having someone dedicate their time to doing it. And I'm willing to volunteer for the writing aspect is Valg or another person is willing to promise Sahuagin (or Triton maybe) to populate all the new waterways.
|
|
|
|
          |
Moligant | Tue 22-Jul-14 08:31 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
327 posts
| |
|
#56059, "RE: Theran rivers never reach the sea..."
In response to Reply #23
Edited on Tue 22-Jul-14 08:33 PM
|
Which doesn't really make sense when you think about it.
And it would take some serious re-writing but I'm fairly sure it could be done without coding anything. Rewrite a few rooms so that the rivers actually connect to the seas...not major. As Valg pointed out the major issue is having someone dedicate their time to doing it. And I'm willing to volunteer for the writing aspect if Valg or another person is willing to promise Sahuagin (or Triton maybe) to populate all the new waterways. I don't need (or particularly want) to be an Imm, I just want to help if thats what is needed to get the ball rolling.
|
|
|
|
          | |
            |
incognito | Wed 23-Jul-14 07:20 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#56062, "As does"
In response to Reply #26
|
The steaming river of kiadana.
|
|
|
|
            |
Tsunami | Wed 23-Jul-14 08:09 AM |
Member since 25th Mar 2008
1509 posts
| |
|
#56063, "Jaheira?"
In response to Reply #26
|
Disapproves of your overly evil ways.
|
|
|
|
              |
Zephon | Wed 23-Jul-14 11:38 AM |
Member since 21st Mar 2007
488 posts
| |
|
#56064, "BG2 reference? Nice."
In response to Reply #28
|
I went back and played the original BG. Those games were a little unforgiving at times. Then again, original D&D was extremely unforgiving with the wrong DM. I only have 1d4 hp. "That's why, I'm always the first to die."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMLcy86bZNw
|
|
|
|
              | |
  |
|
#56893, "Merfolk?"
In response to Reply #2
|
According to many myths about mermaids, they could produce legs for short periods of time, so merfolk could be feasible. What I would propose is give them a 'shifting' skill, not spell so that they can be ragers, that transforms their tail into 2 legs. While shifted thus, they can move on land with some difficulty as they are not used to walking. -2 dex while shifted and every tick that they are shifted, they get an affect of -5% max moves so after 20 ticks of being shifted, they have max moves of 0%, the affect is removed once they revert to tail but can only be done on water. To be fair though, you would have to put a recall point somewhere on or in water so if someone gets to 0 moves they aren't stranded. After 15 ticks, I would suggest they take damage also, starting at scratches and increasing each tick after. It would suck being a rager, but possible as long as you don't stay on land more than 20 ticks, be careful of any sleeping spells/affects.
|
|
|
|
      |
|
#56897, "Sorry, not intentionally"
In response to Reply #35
|
I am a truck driver and don't get a chance to log in here often but today I unloaded at 1am and I don't load until tomorrow so I am just going through all the threads I have missed and these 2 I actually had comments for. I'll try to refrain from bumping anymore threads and just create new ones with a link inside to the OP.
Sorry again.
|
|
|
|
      |
|
#56908, "AWWWW, there goes my idea for a mermaid named Daryl"
In response to Reply #38
|
|
|
|
Eskelian | Mon 30-Sep-13 03:37 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2023 posts
| |
|
#51866, "RE: Any plans for a Sahuagin seasonal race?"
In response to Reply #0
|
Few things :
1) Make them vulnerable to lightning, give them flat 23 dex (flat), 20 int. This is essentially human stats but with immune vs water, vuln vs lightning, and the water breathing bit. 2) Inherent spear 100%. 3) Can see camo underwater, but not get it. Mariners do get it, so that path can camo underwater.
|
|
|
|
  |
Frequentplayer | Mon 30-Sep-13 04:10 PM |
Member since 31st Jul 2013
228 posts
| |
|
#51868, "Just more options please. EDIT =Meant to be under Scara..."
In response to Reply #1
Edited on Mon 30-Sep-13 04:17 PM
|
I'm really looking forward with interest to pixies.
|
|
|
|
|