Scions been without a chancellor or advisor for some time, months, actually. I mean, real life months! This being a game and all, for peoples enjoyment, why in the world is there any reason that one of the scions now cant be given a shot at chancellor? I dont see any excuse for scion to be leaderless for so long, it would be nice if the scion imm (or imms) that decide on that to step up to the plate and give someone a chance to try and lead scion. Its not like if they failed they couldn't be removed. Just think its unfair in a game made for fun that scion hasn't so much as even hinted at bringing a chancellor around, when it is, imho, the best cabal in the game and most fun to play.

nt

Currently, Mekantos and Beroxxus have inductions well covered- Scion has recently been larger than it normally is, in fact.

Leaders get chosen when the right people come around. If no one jumps out, the cabal won't fall off a cliff if we wait a bit.

Its not like if they failed they couldn't be removed.

Bad leaders do more damage than no leaders.

valguarnera@carrionfields.com

No offense to Kungkruk - hell of a player, just does not in my opinion fit the role of a Chancellor.