RE: Confused about Clahier's PBF,
Reksah,
15-Nov-12 10:36 AM, #2
I'm so blond :( nt,
Rayihn,
15-Nov-12 10:39 AM, #3
Woah no, friend!,
Stunna,
15-Nov-12 10:51 AM, #4
You need a new name now,
laxman,
15-Nov-12 12:56 PM, #5
RE: You need a new name now,
Reksah,
15-Nov-12 01:24 PM, #6
I would hope he was 156 to 12, a conjuration that does ...,
Drag0nSt0rm,
15-Nov-12 08:44 AM, #1
| |
|
Reksah | Thu 15-Nov-12 10:36 AM |
Member since 30th Apr 2011
94 posts
| |
|
#47695, "RE: Confused about Clahier's PBF"
In response to Reply #0
|
Baer used the wrong word. Looking at Clahier's timeline, you can see that she plays 29 hours a month, not 29 a week.
|
|
|
|
  |
Rayihn | Thu 15-Nov-12 10:39 AM |
Member since 08th Oct 2006
1147 posts
| |
|
#47696, "I'm so blond :( nt"
In response to Reply #2
|
|
|
  |
laxman | Thu 15-Nov-12 12:56 PM |
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
| |
|
#47698, "You need a new name now"
In response to Reply #2
|
Man jerro ruined that one
|
|
|
|
    |
Reksah | Thu 15-Nov-12 01:24 PM |
Member since 30th Apr 2011
94 posts
| |
|
#47700, "RE: You need a new name now"
In response to Reply #5
|
Heh. Nah, it's fine. In a year it will just be one in a line of similar characters.
I could have demanded it be changed but I decided against it in favor of other options that never came to be due to how short-lived the character was.
|
|
|
|
|
Drag0nSt0rm | Thu 15-Nov-12 08:44 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
450 posts
| |
|
#47693, "I would hope he was 156 to 12, a conjuration that does ..."
In response to Reply #0
|
I would hope he was 156 to 12, a conjuration that does straight unprotected oblits and reengages is no joke
|
|
|
|
|