|
|
Mamed | Mon 29-Mar-04 07:31 PM |
Member since 09th Dec 2003
132 posts
|     |
|
#4230, "What would be the Perfect Tribunal for the Public?"
|
Always wondered on the different thoughs of people about the Tribunal, Post your thoughts!!!
MamedX Jeremiah
|
|
|
|
  RE: What would be the Perfect Tribunal for the Public?,
Grurk Muouk,
30-Mar-04 02:00 PM, #2
  RE: What would be the Perfect Tribunal for the Public?,
Jeremiah,
10-Jan-24 09:04 AM, #3
RE: What would be the Perfect Tribunal for the Public?,
Java,
10-Jan-24 10:55 PM, #4
and whats your ####en point you can add?,
Jeremiah,
11-Jan-24 02:10 AM, #5
Eheh. (n/t),
Aithiar,
11-Jan-24 07:15 AM, #6
Chill.,
Jormyr,
21-Jan-24 10:52 AM, #7
RE: and whats your ####en point you can add?,
Bemused,
21-Jan-24 08:00 PM, #8
RE: and whats your ####en point you can add?,
Jeremiah,
26-Jan-24 03:32 AM, #9
depends,
incognito,
30-Mar-04 04:53 AM, #1
| |
|
|
Grurk Muouk | Tue 30-Mar-04 01:44 PM |
Member since 15th Mar 2004
538 posts
| |
|
#4232, "RE: What would be the Perfect Tribunal for the Public?"
In response to Reply #0
Edited on Tue 30-Mar-04 02:00 PM
|
Having played the gambit of law characters, I will say it
can hinge greatly on your choice of RP. I have had very
respected Tribunal characters and very hated (see:Grurk).
It's all on how you apply your role and trade. If you choose
to apply the laws less literal (read: veteran cop who hates
paperwork), keeping intent in mind, always giving the benefit
of doubt to people, you will flag less. This tends to make
you more affable, thus liked by the general populace.
If you are more stern with your reading of the laws and mark
for every little infraction (read: meter maid), then you are
going to piss people off.
Over the years, I've found it's easy to do little things, like
return knapsacks, food, and items of personal value. Stuff like
that will earn you brownie points with those you oppress.
Grurk
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Jeremiah | Wed 10-Jan-24 09:04 AM |
Member since 29th Jul 2003
29 posts
| |
|
#74830, "RE: What would be the Perfect Tribunal for the Public?"
In response to Reply #2
|
believe it or not i actually remember playing with grurk both as mortal and when you immed... I liked you. I believe that was around the time of kelrizza and farvon or whatever that shamans name was. You were always fair to me as i think Volicitry long time ago Mr. Jeremiah Lee Brown
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Jeremiah | Thu 11-Jan-24 02:10 AM |
Member since 29th Jul 2003
29 posts
| |
|
#74832, "and whats your ####en point you can add?"
In response to Reply #4
|
bravo idiot Mr. Jeremiah Lee Brown
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Jormyr | Sun 21-Jan-24 10:52 AM |
Member since 31st Dec 2014
423 posts
| |
|
#74834, "Chill."
In response to Reply #5
|
Do we seriously have to drop instantly to explitives and insults?
Did Java have to comment on the age? No. Is it out of line when necro'ing a post that old? No. Do some people (I included) appreciate that headsup of "This actually isn't a new topic everyone's talking about, but Jeremiah voiced his opinion"? Absolutely.
Necro'ing the post throws people's perception of the interest of the topic. Not saying you can't do it, but it's pretty unlikely I focus that much on original post dates, so Java's comment is relevant. He didn't insult or belittle you in any way, just made a factual comment.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Bemused | Sun 21-Jan-24 07:59 PM |
Member since 15th Oct 2013
665 posts
| |
|
#74836, "RE: and whats your ####en point you can add?"
In response to Reply #5
Edited on Sun 21-Jan-24 08:00 PM
|
I remember making a post with some interesting points on MASTERS back in 1998. Please reply to it; I'd be very interested in your thoughts because I've been waiting 26 years already. Thank you Jeremiah.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Jeremiah | Fri 26-Jan-24 03:32 AM |
Member since 29th Jul 2003
29 posts
| |
|
#74837, "RE: and whats your ####en point you can add?"
In response to Reply #8
|
lmfao your most welcome. And sorry I was being chill. And will be Mr. Jeremiah Lee Brown
|
|
|
|
|
|
incognito | Tue 30-Mar-04 04:53 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#4231, "depends"
In response to Reply #0
|
Depends on whether, I as the public, happen to be a criminal or not. I'll assume I'm a law-abiding citizen.
Unbiased.
Quick to act when you are being attacked to save you. Not necessarily by flagging if things aren't clear, but at least getting there and breaking it up.
Gathers evidence as thoroughly as needed, building up a picture of events from all sources. It's funny as hell when a tribunal manages to find absolute proof of a crime after someone has looted a corpse and immediately logged off with the gear, thinking they are
Quick to kill the criminal.
Harsh if needed. Lenient if not. As in, punishment will fit the crime. Accidental offenses may result in less gear being lost than intentional ones etc.
Respected externally (and internally). i.e. their decisions are not constantly being questioned and seen to be dubious.
Respected internally, in that they can get other tribunals to work with them effectively where needed.
Have rp.
|
|
|
|
|
