|
Abthalok | Mon 05-Jan-04 10:29 PM |
Member since 04th Dec 2003
36 posts
| |
|
#3398, ""Botting""
|
Most classes have skills/spells which they rely on to be working with as much frequency as possible. Some of these skills/spells need to be perfected to reach the next level in skill/spell progression. Is it really belived that botting is not used? Is there some level of toleration for botting? Do these classes enjoy more lienecy than others? I find it really hard to belive that someone hand spams a 7 path invoker with 7 masteries without having some form of mental illness.
|
|
|
|
From help botting,
Zulghinlour,
05-Jan-04 11:35 PM, #2
RE:,
Isildur,
05-Jan-04 11:14 PM, #1
RE: Turing tests.,
Valguarnera,
06-Jan-04 05:48 PM, #3
RE: Turing tests.,
Isildur,
06-Jan-04 07:06 PM, #4
RE: Turing tests.,
Valguarnera,
06-Jan-04 10:21 PM, #5
RE: Turing tests.,
Zargu,
07-Jan-04 02:36 AM, #6
| |
|
Zulghinlour | Mon 05-Jan-04 11:35 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#3401, "From help botting"
In response to Reply #0
|
An excerpt from 'help rules':
"Using your client to play for you (botting), while ignoring everything else going on around you is not roleplaying, and you will be punished as such."
That pretty much sums up the botting question. Can you use a client to use triggers to help you practice. Yes. Can you use a client to do everything for you without interacting with anything else? Until you get caught and slain/denied for botting. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|