|
|
sleepy | Sun 16-May-10 03:12 PM |
Member since 24th Jul 2007
223 posts
|     |
|
#32658, "Look vs Examine?"
|
Someone said that you dont get obs exp if you examine, but you do if you look. Is this true, and if so, why is it that way?
I mean, if you look at a box, you don't see what's in it, but if you examine it, you do. Wouldn't it make more sense, if anything, to give the exp for examining and not looking? Or just make it so that both give the exp?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farigno | Mon 17-May-10 09:18 AM |
Member since 11th Apr 2006
53 posts
| |
|
#32667, "98 % sure this is untrue"
In response to Reply #0
|
I have an alias that sets my 'l' command to be examine instead, so I don't have to try and figure out if something is a container or not, and I always get observation experience out of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daevryn | Sun 16-May-10 03:20 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#32659, "RE: Look vs Examine?"
In response to Reply #0
|
I don't think this is true.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
sleepy | Sun 16-May-10 04:08 PM |
Member since 24th Jul 2007
223 posts
| |
|
#32660, "Damn those qhcf.net-ers."
In response to Reply #1
|
They never give reliable info.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
CharlieWaffles | Sun 16-May-10 04:36 PM |
Member since 05th Sep 2009
42 posts
| |
|
#32662, "Google superstitious behavior"
In response to Reply #2
Edited on Sun 16-May-10 04:37 PM
|
Because that is often what gets stated as fact on qhcf.
Here is the definition in case you get the wrong search results
Superstitious behavior arises when the delivery of a reinforcer or punisher occurs close together in time (temporal contiguity) with an independent behavior. Therefore, the behavior is accidentally reinforced or punished, increasing the likelihood of that behavior occurring again.
|
|
|
|
|
