Subject: "Basic primer on physical/body saves." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #31423
Show all folders

ValguarneraMon 22-Mar-10 07:25 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31423, "Basic primer on physical/body saves."
Edited on Mon 22-Mar-10 07:32 AM

          

I don't know if these are well-explained anywhere in a help file, so I'm laying these out. If this information isn't in any help file, I'll write one.

Carrion Fields has a long-used (*) function which is essentially a fancy check against Constitution (CON). It has three modes, originally to deal with resistances and vulnerabilities: Poison, Disease, and Other. It used to just be a dice roll against CON, tweaked by res/vulns.

"Other" covers matters of endurance, resistance to pain, etc. Battlerager abilities give some perks here, for example.

These aren't traditional saving throws, in the sense that level doesn't matter, there is no gear category for it, there is no data about the "attacker", etc. Over the years, other things have crept in: Edges, Legacies, subclass abilities (swampdweller rangers vs. poison/disease while in a swamp, etc.), etc.

(*): I found a code update from April, 1997.

valguarnera@carrionfields.com

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Reply Footstomp. Does the Heavy Foot edge help it? n/t, Pro (Guest), 22-Mar-10 06:06 PM, #13
Reply Does + con, Guy (Guest), 22-Mar-10 02:46 PM, #6
Reply Also, Guy (Guest), 22-Mar-10 02:49 PM, #7
Reply RNG plus what valg said, Valkenar, 22-Mar-10 03:35 PM, #10
Reply Gear doesn't matter. CON does., Valguarnera, 22-Mar-10 06:08 PM, #14
     Reply RE: Gear doesn't matter. CON does., Isildur, 23-Mar-10 12:07 PM, #15
          Reply Although it depends on when, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 23-Mar-10 02:06 PM, #16
               Reply RE: Although it depends on when, Isildur, 23-Mar-10 03:34 PM, #17
                    Reply Not that imbalanced, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 23-Mar-10 06:43 PM, #18
                         Reply Oh, and more to the point, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 23-Mar-10 06:45 PM, #19
                         Reply RE: Not that imbalanced, Isildur, 24-Mar-10 09:38 AM, #21
                              Reply RE: Not that imbalanced, Daevryn, 24-Mar-10 09:51 AM, #22
                              Reply The biggest thing about maladictions and effects like t..., Pro (Guest), 24-Mar-10 10:35 AM, #23
                                   Reply RE: The biggest thing about maladictions and effects li..., Isildur, 24-Mar-10 11:26 AM, #24
                                   Reply RE: The biggest thing about maladictions and effects li..., Daevryn, 24-Mar-10 11:33 AM, #25
                                        Reply But do you need 20 irl minutes? :P n/t, Pro (Guest), 24-Mar-10 12:41 PM, #26
                                             Reply RE: But do you need 20 irl minutes? :P n/t, Daevryn, 24-Mar-10 12:53 PM, #27
                              Reply Don't agree, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 24-Mar-10 04:38 PM, #28
Reply RE: Does + con, Daevryn, 22-Mar-10 02:56 PM, #8
     Reply Whilst I understand the logic of what you say, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Mar-10 05:24 PM, #11
          Reply Yah, This is what I'm talking about exactly nt, Guy (Guest), 22-Mar-10 05:27 PM, #12
Reply RE: Basic primer on physical/body saves., Tac, 22-Mar-10 09:43 AM, #2
Reply RE: Basic primer on physical/body saves., Isildur, 22-Mar-10 09:05 AM, #1
     Reply I imagine, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Mar-10 01:32 PM, #3
          Reply RE: I imagine, Isildur, 22-Mar-10 02:25 PM, #4
               Reply "the rack" is a medieval chiropractic table NT, Quix_lz (Guest), 22-Mar-10 02:45 PM, #5
               Reply RE: I imagine, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Mar-10 02:59 PM, #9
                    Reply No damage on the tick, trewyn, 23-Mar-10 07:45 PM, #20

Pro (Guest)Mon 22-Mar-10 06:06 PM

  
#31438, "Footstomp. Does the Heavy Foot edge help it? n/t"
In response to Reply #0


          

fgbsrfgb

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Guy (Guest)Mon 22-Mar-10 02:46 PM

  
#31431, "Does + con"
In response to Reply #0


          

Have any sort of + con factor in all of this?
I know you said no gear factors. But it always seemed to me like wearing + con over your racial max helped you save against rot. as in, I've got a full 18 con, but I"m wearing +5 in con gear I'll save against rot better than just having a full 18 con.

Or does this only apply to the actual timer effect of con?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Guy (Guest)Mon 22-Mar-10 02:49 PM

  
#31432, "Also"
In response to Reply #6


          

I know, again. You said no gear factors.

But I swear it can be hard to land that plague on one 18 con guy, but his 18 con friend its NoProblem. I hit him 2 x as often

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
ValkenarMon 22-Mar-10 03:35 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1203 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31435, "RNG plus what valg said"
In response to Reply #7


          

>I know, again. You said no gear factors.
>
>But I swear it can be hard to land that plague on one 18 con
>guy, but his 18 con friend its NoProblem. I hit him 2 x as
>often

"Edges, Legacies, subclass abilities" If you're sure that it's none of those things, then or similar stuff, then it's rng. It sounds to me like for a certain build you can't really do much to change it (except keep con maxes) but there are miscellaeneous differences between builds.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
ValguarneraMon 22-Mar-10 06:08 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31439, "Gear doesn't matter. CON does."
In response to Reply #7


          

As in, if I read the code there isn't anything that looks at gear.

It checks your CON, of course, so if your gear is keeping your CON high, that's good. Daevryn covered this.

valguarnera@carrionfields.com

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
IsildurTue 23-Mar-10 12:07 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31442, "RE: Gear doesn't matter. CON does."
In response to Reply #14


          

I know this would never be made available to players, but it would be interesting to compile a table that shows, for different starting values of base constitution, how much "con from gear" one must have such that the expected (i.e. "expected" in the statistical sense) con loss from rot doesn't result in player death.

In other words, "with a base con of X, you need Y con from gear in order to have a 50% chance of surviving rot" (for each possible value of X).

Having such a table might highlight whether rot needs to be tweaked in any way w.r.t. game-play considerations.

(I'm not saying it does, necessarily- just that such a table would serve to highlight whether any change is needed.)

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
Daurwyn2 (Guest)Tue 23-Mar-10 02:06 PM

  
#31443, "Although it depends on when"
In response to Reply #15


          

When you wear the gear, that is.

Slapping on the +con gear when already low will only buy more time.

Slapping it on whilst high will give a better return.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
IsildurTue 23-Mar-10 03:34 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31444, "RE: Although it depends on when"
In response to Reply #16


          

Was assuming dude had it all on hand and wore it immediately after the rot was communed.

For instance, if it were the case that a guy with 10 base CON needed to wear +20 CON in order to have a 50% chance of survival, then that would probably be imbalanced.

(Note: Those numbers are just for the sake of argument and probably aren't even REMOTELY accurate.)

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
Daurwyn2 (Guest)Tue 23-Mar-10 06:43 PM

  
#31448, "Not that imbalanced"
In response to Reply #17


          

20 con worth of gear is about 30lbs at most, assuming that you aren't wearing any as part of your basic set.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Daurwyn2 (Guest)Tue 23-Mar-10 06:45 PM

  
#31449, "Oh, and more to the point"
In response to Reply #18


          

Based on what the imms are saying, the probability would vary depending on what race the character is.

A fire giant with 10 con, wearing +20 con, will do much better than a drow with 10 con wearing +20 con, because the fire giant will generally be saving with a higher con.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
IsildurWed 24-Mar-10 09:38 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31469, "RE: Not that imbalanced"
In response to Reply #18


          

So you feel its balanced for characters to need 30 CON on tap (either from base or gear) at all times in order to have a 50% chance of surviving rot?

I sure don't.

I actually feel like a good metric would be, "The race with the lowest base CON, with the stat at max, should not die to rot most of the time in the absence of any +CON gear."

So the only time you'd need to carry +CON gear is if "most of the time" isn't good enough for you, or if your base CON is below 16. Or if you want to account for the possibility that the shaman will try to damn you first for -CON.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
DaevrynWed 24-Mar-10 09:51 AM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31470, "RE: Not that imbalanced"
In response to Reply #21


          

Without doing the math, my general experience as a player is that if I'm around human con I don't need any con gear, and if I'm a lower con race, I might. I'm pretty much okay with that -- if I'm a felar, I accept that my low str and int are drawbacks and I have to find ways to compensate for them; if I'm an elf, I accept that my low con is a drawback and I may have to find ways to compensate for it.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
Pro (Guest)Wed 24-Mar-10 10:35 AM

  
#31473, "The biggest thing about maladictions and effects like t..."
In response to Reply #22


          

For me was that I would basically have to go hide for 10-20 mins irl and find something else to do while waiting for it to pass.

Not fun, so the answer was I don't fight people that use lengthy maladicts, not fun for them either.

Having to wait that long almost always results in people you were hunting logging off, groups you wanted to make disband, raids or counter raids are finished.

There's got a be a better (and shorter) way.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
IsildurWed 24-Mar-10 11:26 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31477, "RE: The biggest thing about maladictions and effects li..."
In response to Reply #23


          

Heal heal, heal refresh. Rot doesn't incapacitate you, it just nukes your regen.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
DaevrynWed 24-Mar-10 11:33 AM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31479, "RE: The biggest thing about maladictions and effects li..."
In response to Reply #23


          

The flipside to that is, I might want you out of my way for a while so I can get my item back, raid your cabal, or any number of things. If you generally sit out rot vs. fight with it, you've given me a way to do that.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
Pro (Guest)Wed 24-Mar-10 12:41 PM

  
#31481, "But do you need 20 irl minutes? :P n/t"
In response to Reply #25


          

sdrgbsr

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
DaevrynWed 24-Mar-10 12:53 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31482, "RE: But do you need 20 irl minutes? :P n/t"
In response to Reply #26


          

If I'm a solo shaman, I probably do.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
Daurwyn2 (Guest)Wed 24-Mar-10 04:38 PM

  
#31486, "Don't agree"
In response to Reply #21


          

It's one of the few chinks in an elf paladins armor. Or that drow ap.

There are non-limited items as follows:
2x ring for +2 each, running total +4
2x neck for +1 each, running total +6
body +3, running total +9
about body +3, running total +12
2 x bracers +2 = running total +16

Throw in juggling balls, a basic +con belt, and you are already at +18, and hardly weighed down at all, even as a weak race.

You can easily expand on the above as your con drops, and this ignores and +con gear that you might happen to be wearing in other slots simply because it is nice gear (e.g. plain phylactery).

Honestly, if Nererial could take a full rot from a hero with the edge and only lose 4 con, it's not op. It may be somewhat tedious to sit there in your crappy anti-rot set, but it isn't really overpowered.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
DaevrynMon 22-Mar-10 02:56 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31433, "RE: Does + con"
In response to Reply #6


          

>Have any sort of + con factor in all of this?
> I know you said no gear factors. But it always seemed to me
>like wearing + con over your racial max helped you save
>against rot. as in, I've got a full 18 con, but I"m wearing +5
>in con gear I'll save against rot better than just having a
>full 18 con.

Nope.

>Or does this only apply to the actual timer effect of con?

This. Well, and in that rot only starts damaging you when your current con is less than your permanent con stat.

Also consider that, several ticks into rot when the rot affect is at let's say -6 con, the just 18 con guy is now saving with a 12 con, whereas the guy with +5 con gear overmax is still saving with a 17 con.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Daurwyn2 (Guest)Mon 22-Mar-10 05:24 PM

  
#31436, "Whilst I understand the logic of what you say"
In response to Reply #8


          

My experience matches Guy's.

For some reason, when I am 20con above my max, I don't seem to lsoe con much when rotting. Maybe 4-6 con in a full strength rot from a hero with the edge, on a drow.

When I am 4 con above, I'm probably toast. And that's partly because I invariably lose con the first 5 ticks when that's the case.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Guy (Guest)Mon 22-Mar-10 05:27 PM

  
#31437, "Yah, This is what I'm talking about exactly nt"
In response to Reply #11


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

TacMon 22-Mar-10 09:43 AM
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2050 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31426, "RE: Basic primer on physical/body saves."
In response to Reply #0


          

So you could potentially save as if you had con higher than 25, but only for things where con matters, i.e. poison, disease, rot, etc?

The helpfile for grit specifically mentions brews of questionable content. Is this some reference to mundunugu brews, or something else? Orc only preps sold in the village you say, why that sounds great I say.

Tac

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

IsildurMon 22-Mar-10 09:05 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31425, "RE: Basic primer on physical/body saves."
In response to Reply #0


          

Interesting. So what falls into the "other" category? Stuff like boneshatter? Kot/kan?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Daurwyn2 (Guest)Mon 22-Mar-10 01:32 PM

  
#31428, "I imagine"
In response to Reply #1


          

Stuff like "wrack" or whatever it is called.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
IsildurMon 22-Mar-10 02:25 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31429, "RE: I imagine"
In response to Reply #3


          

I don't even know what that is. Heh.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Quix_lz (Guest)Mon 22-Mar-10 02:45 PM

  
#31430, ""the rack" is a medieval chiropractic table NT"
In response to Reply #4


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Daurwyn2 (Guest)Mon 22-Mar-10 02:59 PM

  
#31434, "RE: I imagine"
In response to Reply #4


          

I might be using the wrong name, but what it does is:
- prevent resting, let alone sleeping
- screw with regen on top of this (I seem to recall)
- cause spells & supps to fail sometimes (as in, the affected person fails because of the pain, a bit like wasps)
- cause a bit of damage on the tick (again, my memory is not perfect here)

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
trewynTue 23-Mar-10 07:45 PM
Member since 04th Jan 2005
269 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#31452, "No damage on the tick"
In response to Reply #9


          

At least not that I ever experienced.

The echo I remember is something like...
You scream out as your body is wracked with pain

or something like that. I only know of one set of mobs that does it.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #31423 Previous topic | Next topic