I know a cap on limited items held or looted has been proposed before. Is it time for a rehash?

What if it was capped at 2 limited items for every 5 levels, not counting sleek wands, starting at level 11 with 2.

At level 16 that is 4 limited items worn/inventory/preps.

At 26 that's 8.
31 = 10.
36 = 12.
41 = 14.
46 = 16.
51 = no limits.

Items are still circulated.

The player would get a pecho if they're at the max limit while trying to pick up a limited item or loot from a corpse, forcing the player to drop items.

Looting to help out a fallen cabal- or group-mate is a bit more difficult, but that also gives other people a chance to snag a few items.

Mobs are limited to 3 limited items each.

nt

I'm the first person to say that melee people with hero gear are stupidly overpowered and no fun at all, but I still don't think setting limits like these is a positive step.

There's no real way to do it that isn't dumb. I'd prefer that instead of this, the effectiveness of armor is reduced by your level in relationship to it's. So if you're level 16 and the item is level 51, all the stats are multiplied by 16/51... but I don't think that's a good solution either.

Lowbies looting heroes is just a part of CF.

More pk aggressive lowbies, and not full-loot hero, rank to optimal range, rape range types.

I'm talking about having 5-10 shamanman or RobDarken types at all ranges, just running around trying to pk anyone and everyone.

Plus, more heroes need to loot lowbies (just NOT FULL LOOT, christ, get all.mantle, get all.ring yes, get all corpse no, you always miss the best ####) because hey, why the #### not.

In truth, just sack up. Saying this somewhat tongue in cheek because I hate the full-loot myself.

>I'm talking about having 5-10 shamanman or RobDarken types at
>all ranges, just running around trying to pk anyone and
>everyone.

If you can make it so there are consistently player numbers like this I'll give you $300.

NT