|
Adrigon | Mon 26-Oct-09 09:22 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
158 posts
| |
|
#27303, "How about edge to reroll familiar?"
|
How about an edge to reroll your familiar similar to roll of bones for shapeshifters?
|
|
|
|
RE: How about edge to reroll familiar?,
Daevryn,
26-Oct-09 06:40 PM, #2
*fistshake* nt,
Adekar,
26-Oct-09 06:47 PM, #4
RE: How about edge to reroll familiar?,
_Magus_,
26-Oct-09 11:00 PM, #5
You only invest 17 levels. If you don't like it....dele...,
Abernyte,
26-Oct-09 05:54 PM, #1
We've talked about it,
Adekar,
26-Oct-09 06:45 PM, #3
Rerolling... ug,
Not An Imm,
27-Oct-09 05:01 PM, #6
Just a thought,
_Magus_,
27-Oct-09 05:32 PM, #7
RE: Just a thought,
Not An Imm,
27-Oct-09 05:59 PM, #8
RE: Just a thought,
orlando,
27-Oct-09 10:30 PM, #9
| |
|
Daevryn | Mon 26-Oct-09 06:40 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#27316, "RE: How about edge to reroll familiar?"
In response to Reply #0
|
Without saying "Never":
1) Currently, I don't keep track of how much you've used your familiar, and I'm not interested in doing something like this without the roll-the-bones-like restriction of 'You need to swap this as soon as you see what you've got, without getting to use it a while first.'
2) Probably at level 17 you can't pick / can't afford the edge for it, so I assume 99% of the people who didn't like their familiar would still just reroll.
|
|
|
|
|
Abernyte | Mon 26-Oct-09 05:54 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
973 posts
| |
|
#27314, "You only invest 17 levels. If you don't like it....dele..."
In response to Reply #0
|
it is not as bad as 42+ levels invested.
-----Abernyte
|
|
|
|
    |
Not An Imm | Tue 27-Oct-09 05:01 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
141 posts
| |
|
#27321, "Rerolling... ug"
In response to Reply #3
|
I have frustrating memories of one particular conjurer that wanted an owl, but got the Faerie Dragon 3 times, rerolling twice in the process.
After the third faerie dragon, I gave up on caring about my familiar and found he was actually marginally useful in certain situations. He didn't meet the role I made up or play style I had decided for this character, however, so I always felt crippled compared to other conjurers. I adapted, and survived with around 200 hours on this char, but I would never do another conjurer again because of it.
For some things, randomness works well... shifters for instance, since they are decently balanced. For something as crucial as a major class power (familiars), I'd like to see less randomness, or atleast some parity among what the familiars can do.
|
|
|
|
        |
Not An Imm | Tue 27-Oct-09 05:59 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
141 posts
| |
|
#27323, "RE: Just a thought"
In response to Reply #7
|
It was about 6 years ago, so not terribly recent. I wasn't aware of the name association at the time, so used the same name each reroll. I vaguely recall the original familiar helpfiles implying the location you first call a familiar from was a factor. Maybe I am remembering that wrong.
|
|
|
|
          |
orlando | Tue 27-Oct-09 10:30 PM |
Member since 06th Jun 2009
7 posts
| |
|
#27326, "RE: Just a thought"
In response to Reply #8
|
Haha, yeah, it was your name. That's kind of funny in a way.
|
|
|
|
|