|
Susubienko | Sun 09-Aug-09 06:32 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
113 posts
| |
|
#26275, "Fortress and Hell"
|
I just read Dargin's pbf. In it Rayihn wrote she wasn't happy Dargin crossed the sixth. I am assuming she meant the sixth circle of hell.
Maybe I missed some discussion of this on his battlefield thread or elsewhere, and if so, please point me in the right direction, but if not, since when are members of the fortress allowed to go beyond the first circle? Why wasn't he drummed out the moment he did it?
Was he transported to the lower circles via some other means than the usual method of going from 1st to 2nd circle, thereby bypassing the problem for fortressites? Because if not, I'm very confused.
Would appreciate some clarification on this, please. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Goodies and Hell...,
ORB,
10-Aug-09 11:08 AM, #10
The answer and the solution!!!,
laxman,
10-Aug-09 06:16 PM, #17
RE: The answer and the solution!!!,
asylumius,
11-Aug-09 12:54 PM, #19
Disagree with your narrow view.,
ORB,
11-Aug-09 01:32 PM, #20
RE: Disagree with your narrow view.,
asylumius,
11-Aug-09 03:24 PM, #22
RE: The answer and the solution!!!,
ORB,
11-Aug-09 01:34 PM, #21
this was not the case for all of cf's history,
laxman,
11-Aug-09 04:55 PM, #23
Any role,
Vortex Magus,
09-Aug-09 11:59 PM, #4
The bull is not evil btw n/t,
Dervish,
10-Aug-09 12:37 PM, #11
Which makes date raping it EVEN WORSE nt,
Baerinika,
10-Aug-09 01:15 PM, #12
Roofies are evil, Viagra is not. nt,
Scrimbul,
10-Aug-09 11:53 PM, #18
Heh, american sexual morals,
Nightgaunt_,
12-Aug-09 11:31 AM, #25
RE: Heh, american sexual morals,
Susubienko,
12-Aug-09 01:14 PM, #26
Technically...,
Daevryn,
10-Aug-09 01:36 PM, #13
I was sphere purity. I should have had issues with it. ...,
Zephon,
11-Aug-09 08:21 PM, #24
Going to the 2nd doesn't auto-change align....,
Twist,
09-Aug-09 06:44 PM, #1
RE: Going to the 2nd doesn't auto-change align....,
ORB,
09-Aug-09 11:35 PM, #2
RE: Going to the 2nd doesn't auto-change align....,
Susubienko,
09-Aug-09 11:56 PM, #3
Pretty sure it never was a rule...,
Twist,
10-Aug-09 12:03 AM, #5
RE: Pretty sure it never was a rule...,
Susubienko,
10-Aug-09 12:16 AM, #6
I know when I was Fort Captain..,
Java,
10-Aug-09 12:19 AM, #7
RE: Going to the 2nd doesn't auto-change align....,
Daevryn,
10-Aug-09 12:30 AM, #8
RE: Going to the 2nd doesn't auto-change align....,
Aarn,
10-Aug-09 02:14 PM, #14
This is very true,
Baerinika,
10-Aug-09 06:23 AM, #9
RE: This is very true,
Susubienko,
10-Aug-09 02:28 PM, #15
RE: This is very true,
Baerinika,
10-Aug-09 03:08 PM, #16
| |
|
ORB | Mon 10-Aug-09 11:08 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#26297, "Goodies and Hell..."
In response to Reply #0
|
I don't understand why you couldn't just write in Shokai's elite troops have found another path down in their eternal war with Hell. So goodies can use it, but maybe it is a high price like 1/3 of a con or something? I mean from what I know there really isn't much goodie gear down there anyway, so dont' see what the big deal is. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
  |
laxman | Mon 10-Aug-09 06:16 PM |
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
| |
|
#26305, "The answer and the solution!!!"
In response to Reply #10
|
"I don't understand why you couldn't just write in Shokai's elite troops have found another path down in their eternal war with Hell. So goodies can use it, but maybe it is a high price like 1/3 of a con or something? I mean from what I know there really isn't much goodie gear down there anyway, so dont' see what the big deal is."
because if you touch hell without scarabs permision he will turn around and ask the imm staff to remove everything he contributed to the game, which includes hell and more (he has done this in the past, this is why hell was closed all those years). The only way to get a goodie path in is to have him write it, and he isn't active enough to bother doing it. This is why that has not and likely never will change. Because while all the imms tip toe around it in fear of his whine fest scarab is in real life a huge baby about sharing, I said it scarab your a wuss. Imms feel free to edit that out if your scared of him running home with his ball again.
The solution to this problem, imms turn a blind eye to the forties doing the tansitions. but but but thats bad rp!!! well if it was any imm other then scarab involved in this we likely would have a goodie path written, the area was made when we were not as nit picky about these things. The only real solution is to just allow them to go through without penalty because honestly it makes a ####ton of sense that goodies would want to go try and kill the devils. I mean sure we stand to erradicate all evil, except the actual most evil things ever because well they have a bull in the way so lets let them continue to plot, fester, and otherwise corrupt things because we can't get the imms to make a suitable rp way for us to go through.
disclaimer I love you imms but seriously this is a case where game design is flawed in such a way that it impedes gameplay and cannot be easily solved mechanically so perhaps the best thing to do is to slacken off on the r-police just in this instance. If goodies are just going down randomly and often to #### around or gear hunt maybe slap them then but if they are trying to take down devils they should be rewarded not punished.
|
|
|
|
    |
asylumius | Tue 11-Aug-09 12:53 PM |
Member since 09th Apr 2007
137 posts
| |
|
#26312, "RE: The answer and the solution!!!"
In response to Reply #17
Edited on Tue 11-Aug-09 12:54 PM
|
One thing to consider is that while goodies would legitimately want to kill the evil beasties, in the case of Hell, it's sort of silly. It's Hell. It's where a lot of evil, dead, essentially immortal begins live. Going into Hell to eradicate the evil and “cleanse” the place isn't really a plausible endeavor for Team Fortress, let's say. In CF, you can never kill enough bad guys or vanquish one big boss to banish evil from the lands. Similarly, while most of Hell is evil, and goodies don't like evil, there's also the prerogative that only bad guys wind up in Hell, so it sort of serves it's purpose. Since you can't really destroy Hell or “win” at it, you might as well just sit back and feel good about the fact that while there may be a bunch of devils and demons down there, they're gnawing on the flesh of evil bastards and nobody else (usually).
The way it was originally designed makes perfect sense to me. Almost every other “angle” is based more on a OOC desire to explore and get certain equipment (even for goodies) than a genuine necessity to slaughter herds of devils when there is PLENTY of good to be done and evil to be p0wned in the realm of the living.
EDIT: Fixed typos
|
|
|
|
      |
ORB | Tue 11-Aug-09 01:32 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#26313, "Disagree with your narrow view."
In response to Reply #19
Edited on Tue 11-Aug-09 01:32 PM
|
You are completely generalizing based on your bias view. There are plenty of stories in literature and other angles in CF on why a goodie might want to travel into hell. Completely disagree with you. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
        |
asylumius | Tue 11-Aug-09 03:24 PM |
Member since 09th Apr 2007
137 posts
| |
|
#26315, "RE: Disagree with your narrow view."
In response to Reply #20
|
There are plenty of stories in literature, but that literature isn't CF.
Other literature doesn't apply to CF. In fact, in many ways, elements of Hell as they are described in Dante's Inferno itself don't apply to CF.
While there may be legitimate reasons why some good-aligned characters might want to enter Hell for reasons other than shinies and useful trinkets from Dis, I just don't see them being numerous or important (in a righteous goodie way) enough to warrant the time investment involved building a special path just for them.
Your take would make more sense to me if Hell really was more like Dante's Inferno, but my experience from what I've heard from Imms ( good imms) in-character is that it isn't really the same atmosphere.
The only thing my views are biased on is what I've experienced in-character on a handful of occasions. Personally, as a player, I'd love to tear it up with Team Fort without Da Bull packing my fudge (get it?).
|
|
|
|
    |
ORB | Tue 11-Aug-09 01:34 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#26314, "RE: The answer and the solution!!!"
In response to Reply #17
|
I was under then impression that once you write and area it belongs to CF. He can make a stink but really he doesn't have alot of options. I believe last time it was closed was just the other Imms doing it to be nice, but he's pretty much abandoned the game, so let's move on as well. Also I'm not sure he's as childish as you are implying. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
      |
laxman | Tue 11-Aug-09 04:55 PM |
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
| |
|
#26316, "this was not the case for all of cf's history"
In response to Reply #21
|
I think this work predates that
|
|
|
|
|
Vortex Magus | Sun 09-Aug-09 11:59 PM |
Member since 20th Apr 2005
400 posts
| |
|
#26285, "Any role"
In response to Reply #0
|
where someone would have serious problems with getting anally raped by a super-evil-unnatural giant demon-animal-thingy should not go past the second circle.
Though this should probably include people from battle, scion, empire, and outlander, only goodies and more particularly fort are really held to this standard. I recall Cormindon roleplaying having serious emo issues with it, even though he did it to save a friend. I thought that was cool.
|
|
|
|
  |
Dervish | Mon 10-Aug-09 12:37 PM |
Member since 11th Oct 2003
617 posts
|
|
|
#26298, "The bull is not evil btw n/t"
In response to Reply #4
|
|
|
      |
Nightgaunt_ | Wed 12-Aug-09 11:31 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
188 posts
| |
|
#26319, "Heh, american sexual morals"
In response to Reply #12
Edited on Wed 12-Aug-09 11:31 AM
|
It can't possibly be worse than slaying a neutral mob and my guess is that few maran have 0 neutral mob kills.
Funstick people, funstick. It is a pretty cool area and I remember going there with a Dawn group the first time, it was truly awesome and I don't see why the interpretation has to hinder other to experience the same.
(but the idea that you only need one item per group instead if individual at certain parts would be nice yes)
|
|
|
|
        |
Susubienko | Wed 12-Aug-09 01:14 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
113 posts
| |
|
#26320, "RE: Heh, american sexual morals"
In response to Reply #25
|
|
|
  |
Daevryn | Mon 10-Aug-09 01:36 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#26300, "Technically..."
In response to Reply #4
|
You slip the bull some date-rape drug, so you're raping the bull even though it's boning you.
It's the worst of both worlds.
|
|
|
|
  |
Zephon | Tue 11-Aug-09 08:21 PM |
Member since 21st Mar 2007
488 posts
| |
|
#26318, "I was sphere purity. I should have had issues with it. ..."
In response to Reply #4
|
|
|
  |
Susubienko | Sun 09-Aug-09 11:56 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
113 posts
| |
|
#26284, "RE: Going to the 2nd doesn't auto-change align...."
In response to Reply #1
|
That's interesting to hear. Because that's exactly the opposite of what I "knew" as all my fortressites of the last few years. It wasn't a "shouldn't" but rather a "can't" go. Like, not compatible with life in the fort sorta thing. So you're saying it's no longer a rule that you can't go beyond the first circle (or at least you can't go if you are using the usual method of going) if you want to be part of the fortress?
|
|
|
|
      |
Susubienko | Mon 10-Aug-09 12:16 AM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
113 posts
| |
|
#26287, "RE: Pretty sure it never was a rule..."
In response to Reply #5
|
That's good to know. Thanks for responding quickly and clearly. Appreciated.
|
|
|
|
    |
Daevryn | Mon 10-Aug-09 12:30 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#26289, "RE: Going to the 2nd doesn't auto-change align...."
In response to Reply #3
|
I know some Fort leaders have set that rule, but to the best of my knowledge, the Fort imms haven't.
|
|
|
|
      |
Aarn | Mon 10-Aug-09 02:14 PM |
Member since 04th Feb 2005
566 posts
| |
|
#26301, "RE: Going to the 2nd doesn't auto-change align...."
In response to Reply #8
|
It was definitely not a rule when I was a Fort imm.
I don't recall the issue ever coming up though, so if anyone did go when I was around, it was a minimal thing.
Aarn
|
|
|
|
    |
Susubienko | Mon 10-Aug-09 02:28 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
113 posts
| |
|
#26302, "RE: This is very true"
In response to Reply #9
|
Hrm, let me ask you something. If the person going is already a maran, would you demote to squire or just think less of them going forward? (With some history comment on it of course.)
|
|
|
|
|