|
HunterElf | Wed 05-Aug-09 09:41 AM |
Member since 24th Jul 2009
31 posts
| |
|
#26157, "Question on damage type"
|
I'm curious about physical damage - is it all pretty much the same or are there some difference.
For example, against a human would a sword with 'rending gale' have roughly the same effect as one with a 'slash'? Would the same thing hold against a giant or an arial?
I know fire, cold, light, etc.. all cause different impacts (I've read help damage) but there are times when I've wondered if there might be some hidden effects that don't show up (not considering weapon material of course).
Just something I've been wondering about.
|
|
|
|
RE: Question on damage type,
Mort,
05-Aug-09 10:01 AM, #1
RE: Question on damage type,
Isildur,
05-Aug-09 10:21 AM, #2
RE: Question on damage type,
Mort,
05-Aug-09 11:02 AM, #3
RE: Question on damage type,
Isildur,
05-Aug-09 12:16 PM, #4
Gotcha, it was just that you posted it under my post :P...,
Mort,
05-Aug-09 12:18 PM, #5
Clarification,
HunterElf,
05-Aug-09 12:42 PM, #6
RE: Clarification,
Isildur,
05-Aug-09 12:47 PM, #7
RE: Clarification,
Mort,
05-Aug-09 12:54 PM, #8
RE: Clarification,
RandomThinker,
05-Aug-09 06:38 PM, #9
RE: Clarification,
DurNominator,
06-Aug-09 08:32 AM, #10
| |
|
Mort | Wed 05-Aug-09 10:01 AM |
Member since 23rd Jan 2006
194 posts
| |
|
#26158, "RE: Question on damage type"
In response to Reply #0
|
>I'm curious about physical damage - is it all pretty much the >same or are there some difference. > >For example, against a human would a sword with 'rending gale' >have roughly the same effect as one with a 'slash'? Would the >same thing hold against a giant or an arial?
Humans and arials have no resistance or vulnerability to physical or any of its subtypes. Giants have resist physical, which covers each of bash/pierce/slash. So, giant takes less damage than the other two from any slashing attack, including rending gale.
>I know fire, cold, light, etc.. all cause different impacts > I've read help damage) but there are times when I've wondered >if there might be some hidden effects that don't show up (not >considering weapon material of course).
The only hidden effect I can think of is that poisonous bite can cause poisoning when coming from an *actual weapon* and not a "weaponless" melee attack, like a shifter's.
|
|
|
|
    |
Mort | Wed 05-Aug-09 11:02 AM |
Member since 23rd Jan 2006
194 posts
| |
|
#26160, "RE: Question on damage type"
In response to Reply #2
|
Sure, vampires used to be (not anymore though as far as I can tell) and I don't see why others couldn't be, but what does this have to do with anything I said? I'm confused.
|
|
|
|
        |
Mort | Wed 05-Aug-09 12:18 PM |
Member since 23rd Jan 2006
194 posts
| |
|
#26162, "Gotcha, it was just that you posted it under my post :P..."
In response to Reply #4
|
No John, you are the n/t
|
|
|
|
    |
HunterElf | Wed 05-Aug-09 12:42 PM |
Member since 24th Jul 2009
31 posts
| |
|
#26166, "Clarification"
In response to Reply #2
|
I suppose I could've written that more clearly.
I know there are several common types of physical damage that are different like the blunt, slash, pierce, etc.. and that some races/mobs are vulnerable to some types.
What I'm wondering is does an attack (again using 'rending gale' as an example) have not only a physical component but an elemental one as well? Would a flying target be more vulnerable to 'rending gale' than a slash?
I was wondering the same thing about searing light - is it both light and flame or just light?
There are a lot of other examples out there. I'm just trying to figure how much is style and how much is substance.
|
|
|
|
        |
Mort | Wed 05-Aug-09 12:54 PM |
Member since 23rd Jan 2006
194 posts
| |
|
#26169, "RE: Clarification"
In response to Reply #7
|
IIRC this came up in the same thread and he said it wasn't the case, and that only melee attacks that have the special property are voker touches?
|
|
|
|
        |
RandomThinker | Wed 05-Aug-09 06:38 PM |
Member since 25th Jul 2005
30 posts
| |
|
#26186, "RE: Clarification"
In response to Reply #7
|
You're correct as far as I know. It's basically slash/bash/pierce/probably some others I'm forgetting and mobs may be vulnerable, resistant, or immune to one but not the others.
rending gale is just blunt. searing light is just light.
As far as the magic thing goes I have no clue.
|
|
|
|
      |
DurNominator | Thu 06-Aug-09 08:32 AM |
Member since 08th Nov 2004
2018 posts
| |
|
#26191, "RE: Clarification"
In response to Reply #6
|
>What I'm wondering is does an attack (again using 'rending >gale' as an example) have not only a physical component but an >elemental one as well? Would a flying target be more >vulnerable to 'rending gale' than a slash? > >I was wondering the same thing about searing light - is it >both light and flame or just light?
One attack cannot be of multiple damage types. Rending gale is just a regular slash attack and the difference between them is cosmetic. Searing light is light. In addition to damage type, you can have material you can be vulnerable or resistant to. So, one material and one damage type per attack. It is that simple.
Read the helpfile of 'damage type' to see what nouns are connected to what damage types.
|
|
|
|
|