|
HunterElf | Fri 31-Jul-09 09:10 PM |
Member since 24th Jul 2009
31 posts
| |
|
#26038, "Question on Camp: Did it get toned down?"
|
By that I mean, some time in the last year or so. HP regen rates sure do seem a *lot* lower than I seem to recall from previous rangers.
|
|
|
|
|
Daevryn | Fri 31-Jul-09 09:11 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#26039, "Nope (n/T)"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
  |
HunterElf | Fri 31-Jul-09 09:14 PM |
Member since 24th Jul 2009
31 posts
| |
|
#26041, "RE: Nope (n/T)"
In response to Reply #1
|
Hmph, probably just my memory filters playing tricks on me.
|
|
|
|
  |
Dallevian | Fri 31-Jul-09 10:11 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#26045, "No kidding?"
In response to Reply #1
|
I thought I went from getting around 130 a tick to like 80 or so. Is it con related at all because I did lose a few points?
|
|
|
|
    |
Daevryn | Fri 31-Jul-09 10:17 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#26046, "RE: No kidding?"
In response to Reply #3
Edited on Fri 31-Jul-09 10:18 PM
|
(edited to make this a little more clear)
If we're talking HP, yeah that's con related.
Camp basically is two things:
1) It's like nap, in that it lets you go to sleep in some cases when otherwise you couldn't because of rushing adrenaline and the like, and
2) It's a flat and not especially huge multiplier on regen beyond that. In other words, it's proportional to the kind of regen in each category you'd get sleeping normally.
#2 isn't exactly a lot of code and it doesn't look different to me.
|
|
|
|
      |
Dallevian | Fri 31-Jul-09 10:46 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#26047, "Ok."
In response to Reply #4
|
Thanks. It has been several weeks since I played the ranger but your response makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|