I've actually seen "Your skin of bark deflects enemies ...,
KoeKhaos,
25-May-09 01:58 PM, #6
RE: Bark skin question:,
Daevryn,
25-May-09 07:26 AM, #3
Do barkskin edges actually work?,
Dorz,
25-May-09 08:22 AM, #4
And the druid version, skin of the redwoods, sounds lik...,
GinGa,
25-May-09 09:10 AM, #5
So...I can't help but think of savages with this.,
Straklaw,
25-May-09 09:18 PM, #7
-AC is never useless. nt,
vargal,
25-May-09 04:40 AM, #1
Maybe not.. but it's about the closest thing to it, for...,
Java,
25-May-09 04:52 AM, #2
| |
|
KoeKhaos | Mon 25-May-09 01:57 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
400 posts
| |
|
#24872, "I've actually seen "Your skin of bark deflects enemies ..."
In response to Reply #0
Edited on Mon 25-May-09 01:58 PM
|
So I wouldn't call it useless. Also at the lower levels, that +AC makes mobs miss a LOT.
Never got the edges. They must cost a lot or require over 90% bark skin... which never goes up for me!
|
|
|
|
|
Daevryn | Mon 25-May-09 07:26 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#24868, "RE: Bark skin question:"
In response to Reply #0
|
Essentially, bark skin for deflection purposes is a minimum baseline armor. If you've got actual armor on a location, probably what you have is better and barkskin has no effect. On the other hand if you're wearing clothing or treasure or something with little or no armor value, barkskin gives you at least a chance for an armor deflection when that location is targetted.
Otherwise, it's just AC, although there are some barkskin edges.
|
|
|
|
  |
Dorz | Mon 25-May-09 08:22 AM |
Member since 18th Mar 2009
16 posts
| |
|
#24870, "Do barkskin edges actually work?"
In response to Reply #3
|
I mean these: BARKSKIN OF PINE SAP (anti-disarm) BARKSKIN OF THE SHADY ELM (better resist head/cold) BARKSKIN OF THE FEATHERY WILLOW (dam reduction vs slash)
I've talked to a few rangers who took these and they did not see any difference. My estimate benefit is less then 5%. Or just plain not working.
BARKSKIN OF THE MIGHTY OAK - This might be only worthy edge. Even if it is just +1str.
|
|
|
|
|
vargal | Mon 25-May-09 04:40 AM |
Member since 07th Apr 2004
384 posts
| |
|
#24865, "-AC is never useless. nt"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
  |
Java | Mon 25-May-09 04:52 AM |
Member since 07th Apr 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#24866, "Maybe not.. but it's about the closest thing to it, for..."
In response to Reply #1
|
|
|
|