I agree.,
Vortex Magus,
14-Dec-08 07:51 PM, #10
RE: If you do another double XP weekend,
Hutto,
13-Dec-08 01:31 AM, #9
RE: If you do another double XP weekend,
Vadis,
12-Dec-08 05:15 PM, #8
RE: If you do another double XP weekend,
Xanthrailles,
11-Dec-08 12:51 PM, #4
RE: If you do another double XP weekend,
Xanthrailles,
12-Dec-08 07:11 AM, #5
Yup,
Stunna,
12-Dec-08 11:38 AM, #6
Why can't you solo-rank on Double XP weekend?,
TheLastMohican,
12-Dec-08 12:30 PM, #7
I had planned to roll a character next double XP weeken...,
TheLastMohican,
10-Dec-08 11:38 PM, #3
90% chance of being in with a good, roleplayed empowerm...,
shamanman,
10-Dec-08 06:10 PM, #2
In. With logs. nt,
Dallevian,
10-Dec-08 04:38 PM, #1
| |
|
Vortex Magus | Sun 14-Dec-08 07:51 PM |
Member since 20th Apr 2005
400 posts
| |
|
#23077, "I agree."
In response to Reply #0
|
one of the most boring parts of a character, in my opinion, is the grind to level 51. Once that part is over with I have fun ^^
|
|
|
|
|
Vadis | Fri 12-Dec-08 05:15 PM |
Member since 12th Dec 2008
1 posts
| |
|
#23067, "RE: If you do another double XP weekend"
In response to Reply #0
|
Toss me in the mix for yay on proposition 2X XP Right this ship and set sail for rejuvenation.
|
|
|
|
    |
TheLastMohican | Fri 12-Dec-08 12:30 PM |
Member since 25th Oct 2005
342 posts
| |
|
#23065, "Why can't you solo-rank on Double XP weekend?"
In response to Reply #5
|
That too me is the most buggy part of double XP weekend, and probably the reason the IMMs don't want to do it all the time.
You could feasibly solo to 40-45 in one weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
TheLastMohican | Wed 10-Dec-08 11:38 PM |
Member since 25th Oct 2005
342 posts
| |
|
#23060, "I had planned to roll a character next double XP weeken..."
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|
shamanman | Wed 10-Dec-08 06:10 PM |
Member since 05th Jul 2004
244 posts
| |
|
#23059, "90% chance of being in with a good, roleplayed empowerm..."
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|
Dallevian | Wed 10-Dec-08 04:38 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#23058, "In. With logs. nt"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|