Subject: "Is the sleek wand system working?" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #21207
Show all folders

TheerklaSun 27-Apr-08 12:36 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#21207, "Is the sleek wand system working?"


          

Just deleted my mage experiment and I have to say in my opinion it seems completely and totally broken. Now, before you explain to me how I should have gone about finding my wands, or how easy they are to find, let me explain. Once I hit hero and got detect artifact, I found all three of my wands in a couple nights. Barrier was somewhat hard getting, but I had what to me was an endless supply of aura and shield that I just had to walk up and get. So much so that I had no compunctions whatsoever in using them to fight mobs. Especially with enough game instability that even if I was empty, I could come close to getting all four in a single session.

Now I know why it feels like every mage I fight in the hero ranks has damage reduction out the yingyang. The sleek wands are just too plentiful in my decidedly self-serving opinion as a non-mage player.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

incognitoSun 27-Apr-08 05:09 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
Click to add this author to your buddy list
#21212, "For Victoria"
In response to Reply #0


          

All three were easy.

One was on a mob that gets killed regularly. One was pickable up off the ground in a non-dangerous area. One was grab and flee in a dangerous area, but very easy for Victoria to get since most mobs there were not hostile to her.

So abs effectively unlimited from the point that I found the sleek black (which took forever!).

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #21207 Previous topic | Next topic