Subject: "Afflict vs. Harm" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #2064
Show all folders

Graatch (inactive user)Sat 23-Aug-03 07:52 PM
Charter member
posts
#2064, "Afflict vs. Harm"


          

Not to argue with an Implementor, but, harm was not 'ass' as much as you might think.

When I played Farnsworth recently I noticed that there is a class of mobs who were immune to demonfire, immune to dispel evil, and pretty much immune to everything I could do... except harm.

Harm work(ed?) against several things that nothing else did, for instance a whole host of hell mobs. Other mobs too, such as certain undead and of course many neutral mobs. I am sure you can figure these out yourselves without me having to list them.

So the question is, does the new Afflict work as harm did, and affect in the same way, or did shamen lose the ability to harm certain mobs now?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ValguarneraSat 23-Aug-03 08:26 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2065, "RE: Afflict vs. Harm"
In response to Reply #0


          

Not to argue with an Implementor, but, harm was not 'ass' as much as you might think.

No, really. It was. There aren't a lot of secrets to a spell that literally has 5 or 6 lines of code.

So the question is, does the new Afflict work as harm did, and affect in the same way, or did shamen lose the ability to harm certain mobs now?

Yup. Shamans can Afflict anything they could Harm. The echoes adjust for the target in certain scenarios, but the underlying mechanics are the same.

valguarnera@carrionfields.com

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #2064 Previous topic | Next topic