Either it goes up slowly or it is buggy, but don't expe...,
Quixotic,
16-Apr-07 02:34 PM, #8
RE: Either it goes up slowly or it is buggy, but don't ...,
Daevryn,
16-Apr-07 03:55 PM, #10
I'd say the RNG hates me, but evade does go off occasio...,
Quixotic,
16-Apr-07 05:47 PM, #11
Re-crunched the numbers:,
Valguarnera,
16-Apr-07 10:13 PM, #14
Thanks for looking at the numbers. NT,
Quixotic,
17-Apr-07 10:35 AM, #15
RE: Evade & Armor Use,
Elerosse,
16-Apr-07 02:24 PM, #6
RE: Evade & Armor Use,
Daevryn,
16-Apr-07 01:02 PM, #2
Who made you the f*cking expert!,
Krilcov Krieger,
17-Apr-07 02:30 PM, #16
RE: Evade & Armor Use,
Isildur,
16-Apr-07 12:59 PM, #1
Does it work with spells? I thought no... nt,
Tac,
16-Apr-07 01:30 PM, #3
RE: Does it work with spells? I thought no... nt,
Isildur,
16-Apr-07 01:58 PM, #4
How do I know if an armor is considered light?,
Rodriguez,
16-Apr-07 02:23 PM, #5
RE: How do I know if an armor is considered light?,
Elerosse,
16-Apr-07 02:27 PM, #7
RE: How do I know if an armor is considered light?,
Isildur,
16-Apr-07 02:35 PM, #9
Random observation:,
TheDude,
16-Apr-07 08:34 PM, #12
RE: Random observation:,
Ares,
16-Apr-07 09:22 PM, #13
| |
|
Quixotic | Mon 16-Apr-07 02:34 PM |
Member since 09th Feb 2006
837 posts
| |
|
#17487, "Either it goes up slowly or it is buggy, but don't expe..."
In response to Reply #0
|
On my present character (int build warrior), which I had advanced beyond evade prior to the new code, my defenses and armor use have gone up normally but Evade, Aim, and Precise Aim have gone up a collective 5 points since those skills went in despite a lot of pk and attempts to specifically practice those skills on appropriate mobs. Two of the 5 points came through level increases.
I've put in about 80 hours since Evade went in, and although I see it trigger occasionally, I too would love to see these skills actually improve to 80 before my con runs out.
|
|
|
|
    |
Quixotic | Mon 16-Apr-07 05:47 PM |
Member since 09th Feb 2006
837 posts
| |
|
#17491, "I'd say the RNG hates me, but evade does go off occasio..."
In response to Reply #10
|
I suspect it's Nep who hates me. *sniff*
|
|
|
|
    |
Quixotic | Tue 17-Apr-07 10:35 AM |
Member since 09th Feb 2006
837 posts
| |
|
#17506, "Thanks for looking at the numbers. NT"
In response to Reply #14
|
|
|
|
Elerosse | Mon 16-Apr-07 02:24 PM |
Member since 01st Nov 2006
423 posts
| |
|
#17485, "RE: Evade & Armor Use"
In response to Reply #0
|
> >I have heard that many people not practice both the skills as >they seem useless. Is there any truth to this?
My gut feeling on this is that they don't do much under normal circumstances but are far from useless.
First, they are all automatic skills so the benefit is completely passive, like parry, dodge, etc so it would make sense to practice them because they will confer their benefit without any player effort.
Second, a skill like evade does not need to work very often for it to be a benefit, it only needs to fire once to let you escape a bash down or whatever. I don't think you can rely on it because of it's low % of actually working but I'd practice it with every class that has it available just for the random chance it might save me at some point.
|
|
|
|
|
Daevryn | Mon 16-Apr-07 01:02 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#17480, "RE: Evade & Armor Use"
In response to Reply #0
|
>In the mean time I have mastered Dodge, Parry, Shield Block, >and few other skills and Evade would not increase. Is it one >of those skills I should worry about or forget about it like I >do to "pen"? Is there a way to improve it (I do not want to >be spoon-fed)?
Depends a lot on what you're fighting. Are you being targetted by dirt kicks, kicks, disarms, etc? Then you're probably having chances to improve evade. If you're fighting "dumber" mobs you might not have chances to improve evade.
|
|
|
|
  |
|
#17507, "Who made you the f*cking expert!"
In response to Reply #2
|
Just kidding dude. I was wondering the same thing, I was thinking evade was just a weaker form of parry or dodge. Got it now, thanks. =) krilcov@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
  |
Tac | Mon 16-Apr-07 01:30 PM |
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2050 posts
| |
|
#17481, "Does it work with spells? I thought no... nt"
In response to Reply #1
|
|
|
    |
Elerosse | Mon 16-Apr-07 02:27 PM |
Member since 01st Nov 2006
423 posts
| |
|
#17486, "RE: How do I know if an armor is considered light?"
In response to Reply #5
|
I think light is primarily leather and similar material. Stuff like wood I think falls outside the current armor use skills. This might be completely wrong just what I thought I read.
|
|
|
|
  |
TheDude | Mon 16-Apr-07 08:34 PM |
Member since 20th Sep 2005
285 posts
| |
|
#17496, "Random observation:"
In response to Reply #1
|
For what it's worth, I've noticed light armor use going up exponentiallly quicker while using shield/shield block. It perfected on a high-dex/int assassin almost exclusively while wearing a shield. And I believe only a couple times without the shield. Like, I'd throw the shield on, and bam-bam-bam like three improves vs one mob. This was perfected within a couple levels from getting the skill. Not sure if that's buggy or not. Should this really be firing on shield block? Maybe I was using a "light armor" shield? Not that I'm complaining...
Aim improves fairly well versus armored mobs.
Evade- not a clue how to get this one going.
|
|
|
|
    |
Ares | Mon 16-Apr-07 09:22 PM |
Member since 08th Feb 2007
41 posts
| |
|
#17497, "RE: Random observation:"
In response to Reply #12
|
I'm standing by this one. I've noticed similar things. I'll add though that aim improves at a decent rate against dragons that have armor (e.g. sea serpent, red dragon, midnight dragon, red-gold dragon, etc.).
As a high-intelligence, high-dexterity race, I've had -1- evade improvement from a level gain in roughly 200 hours of gameplay. I am the one tanking 90% of the time too. 90% of all my other skills are 90%-100%, so that goes to show that I am frequently fighting. My verdict is that evade has improve problems. But I don't have access to the code, so it's probably working as intended (even if "as intended" is sort slow and crappy )
|
|
|
|
|