|
|
lurker | Thu 15-Feb-07 02:59 PM |
Member since 13th Mar 2006
249 posts
|    |
|
#16517, "Using actions in tells, yells, says, etc."
|
How do the imms view this?
Example:
You yell '*laughs lightly to herself in near madness*'
Just another reason to thank God that there's a quiet command?
|
|
|
|
|
Valguarnera | Thu 15-Feb-07 03:28 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
| |
|
#16518, "RE: Using actions in tells, yells, says, etc."
In response to Reply #0
|
Example: You yell '*laughs lightly to herself in near madness*
As long as it's "audio" of a volume appropriate to the command, I don't have a problem with it. Within the same room you have a lot of socials plus emote available to you, of course, but if you can yell to someone else in the area, you could communicate in other sounds as well. Yell and tell behave as audio-- they're blocked by Deafen, etc.
Yelling/telling "*smiles*" or whatever strikes me as inappropriate/tacky.
My only issue with the example given is that "laughs lightly to herself" probably shouldn't cover a full area. Other than that, I see no reason to stifle someone's creativity.
valguarnera@carrionfields.com
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Wilhath | Thu 15-Feb-07 03:36 PM |
Member since 19th May 2003
528 posts
| |
|
#16519, "RE: Using actions in tells, yells, says, etc."
In response to Reply #1
|
I generally agree, but audio can be conveyed in other ways.
HAHAHahaHAHEHhahahehahHAHAOAAHAhahaheheahahahahHOOOOOO
AARRRRRRRrrrrrrrRRRRRrrrrgggggGGGHHH!
MOOOoooOOooOOoOoooOoOoOoOoOo!
etc.
But, whatever.
Why not have area socials/emotes that are like the shapeshifter yells.
i.e., You hear Veressis laughing maniacally!
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Tac | Thu 15-Feb-07 04:19 PM |
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2050 posts
|  |
|
#16521, "RE: Using actions in tells, yells, says, etc."
In response to Reply #2
|
>I generally agree, but audio can be conveyed in other ways.
>
>HAHAHahaHAHEHhahahehahHAHAOAAHAhahaheheahahahahHOOOOOO
>
>AARRRRRRRrrrrrrrRRRRRrrrrgggggGGGHHH!
>
>MOOOoooOOooOOoOoooOoOoOoOoOo!
>
>etc.
These suck... They suck badly.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Wilhath | Thu 15-Feb-07 04:21 PM |
Member since 19th May 2003
528 posts
| |
|
#16522, "Good. I was going for "suck." nt"
In response to Reply #3
|
|
|
|
