|
Theerkla | Sat 10-Feb-07 08:48 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#16465, "I really hate to start a ####storm, but I have to comment"
|
More than 50 kills at any level, seems like it should be enough for distention to kick in. Even if you are eating a fair amount of deaths getting those kills. From an outsiders perspective, it seems like whatever formula is being used might be in need of a second look.
|
|
|
|
RE: I really hate to start a ####storm, but I have to c...,
Daevryn,
10-Feb-07 08:52 AM, #1
I think her point is,,
Stunna,
10-Feb-07 09:11 AM, #2
I'm aware. I just don't agree.,
Daevryn,
10-Feb-07 10:46 AM, #3
I think.,
Dallevian,
10-Feb-07 05:13 PM, #4
I don't agree.,
Vladamir,
10-Feb-07 08:13 PM, #5
Pretty sure they are talking about...,
Zulghinlour,
10-Feb-07 08:40 PM, #6
Oh...Thats different then.,
Vladamir,
10-Feb-07 10:45 PM, #7
RE: Oh...Thats different then.,
Ares,
10-Feb-07 10:50 PM, #8
Yes and no...,
Vladamir,
10-Feb-07 10:54 PM, #9
RE: Yes and no...,
Ares,
10-Feb-07 11:01 PM, #10
I wasn't saying all he did was gank.,
Vladamir,
11-Feb-07 06:38 AM, #11
| |
|
Daevryn | Sat 10-Feb-07 08:52 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#16466, "RE: I really hate to start a ####storm, but I have to c..."
In response to Reply #0
|
The closer you get to hero, the harder it is to distend. (Among other factors involved.)
Dying doesn't make you distend less quickly.
|
|
|
|
    |
Daevryn | Sat 10-Feb-07 10:46 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#16468, "I'm aware. I just don't agree."
In response to Reply #2
|
You could distend with 50 kills at any level, but then again you also might not. I'm pretty happy with the way the system works right now.
|
|
|
|
  |
Dallevian | Sat 10-Feb-07 05:13 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#16469, "I think."
In response to Reply #1
|
You'd rather just be stubborn about it to keep from us being partially right. 50+ kills at 41 without a hint of distention seems pretty shoddy, especially on the character involved and all the crapfest of accusations and defenses. I'd be in favor of revising the limits a character distends at, personally.
I'm still aghast at the selective nitpicking immortals scrutinize some characters with but not others. Then again, how kosher would it be to concede in the playerbase's direction...?
You missed the boat on this one, even though you operate and maintain an incredible game worthy of three cheers.
|
|
|
|
      |
Zulghinlour | Sat 10-Feb-07 08:40 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#16471, "Pretty sure they are talking about..."
In response to Reply #5
|
>Thats fewer than 2 PK's per level. I hardly think thats >excessive.
Total PK Wins 74 (53 at level 41)
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
          |
Ares | Sat 10-Feb-07 10:50 PM |
Member since 08th Feb 2007
41 posts
| |
|
#16474, "RE: Oh...Thats different then."
In response to Reply #7
|
By the looks of it, said character in question hit level 41 at or about early January, and deleted at or about early Febuary. Is one month a long time to level sit?
|
|
|
|
            | |
              |
Ares | Sat 10-Feb-07 11:01 PM |
Member since 08th Feb 2007
41 posts
| |
|
#16476, "RE: Yes and no..."
In response to Reply #9
|
PK Gank-O-Meter Total PK Wins 74 Total PK Assists 9 Average Group Size Per Kill 1.18
Death's Gank-O-Meter says: Solo-Killer
Average Group Size Per Death 1.33
Death's Ganked-O-Meter says: Murdered By The Self-Reliant
That doesn't seem very gank-y to me. Other than the mentioned full loot on Gharral Daevryn put in the PBF, I don't see much to warrant much disgust. What's lame about PK'ing?
Then again, I just got done playing a thief who was at the same level for about two months (maybe more?), due to a lack of play time and inability to find groups, so the one month didn't seem excessive to me.
|
|
|
|
                | |
|