|
Theerkla | Fri 12-May-06 08:39 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#13136, "Should wither be pro-rated against expected lifespan?"
|
I know changes may be in the works that would invalidate this, but it seems like a quicky (I know, sometimes the simplest seeming code changes are actually intensive). It would certainly seem more fair to change wither so that it affects all races approximately equally, instead of hammering arials and humans and barely being noticed by the longer-lived races.
|
|
|
|
RE: Should wither be pro-rated against expected lifespa...,
nepenthe,
12-May-06 09:05 AM, #2
Since everyone lives roughly the same number of hours,
Theerkla,
12-May-06 10:44 AM, #3
I am all for making age death much more common,
laxman,
12-May-06 07:47 PM, #4
Wither and Arials,
Kastellyn,
12-May-06 08:56 AM, #1
RE: Wither and Arials,
ORB,
24-May-06 05:07 PM, #5
RE: Wither and Arials,
nepenthe,
24-May-06 06:33 PM, #6
Oh hell?,
Aiekooso,
24-May-06 09:16 PM, #7
RE: Oh hell?,
Grurk Muouk,
25-May-06 07:51 AM, #8
Age items are included in your score age.,
Marcus_,
25-May-06 11:22 AM, #9
The echos for each basically explain it,
Theerkla,
25-May-06 12:26 PM, #10
RE: The echos for each basically explain it,
Straklaw,
25-May-06 04:05 PM, #11
| |
|
nepenthe | Fri 12-May-06 09:05 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
| |
|
#13138, "RE: Should wither be pro-rated against expected lifespa..."
In response to Reply #0
|
At that point, differing race lifespans wouldn't really mean anything anymore.
+age gear, I guess.
|
|
|
|
  |
Theerkla | Fri 12-May-06 10:44 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#13140, "Since everyone lives roughly the same number of hours"
In response to Reply #2
|
I've never thought age as anything other than an RP foil. I suppose race lifespans matter for wither and a few other odd & sundry things, nothing I've given much thought though.
|
|
|
|
    |
laxman | Fri 12-May-06 07:47 PM |
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
| |
|
#13149, "I am all for making age death much more common"
In response to Reply #3
|
But then again I feel 200 hours is a redic long time for a single char.
Personally I think age death should come at 250-300 hours for normal folk and leaders.
|
|
|
|
  |
ORB | Wed 24-May-06 05:07 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#13266, "RE: Wither and Arials"
In response to Reply #1
|
Not for nothing but when I played Skryth the doomed arial Harbinger, I had a ton of +sav gear. It didn't really seem to make a hill of beans difference though when you constantly have shaman as enemies. I was also disappointed on how little that helped in warding off the nasty rips years away affect. Now could I have played it safe and never fought the shamans, yes but that wasn't the roleplay of my character. Instead I did what my character would do and the shamans were able to ruin my character in no time. In fact I got so disgusted with that one, I haven't played since. At the very least you need to allow the character to see the change in his age so they don't get the shock of age dying at mature. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
    |
nepenthe | Wed 24-May-06 06:33 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
| |
|
#13267, "RE: Wither and Arials"
In response to Reply #5
|
>Not for nothing but when I played Skryth the doomed arial >Harbinger, I had a ton of +sav gear.
At times you definitely did, but by far most of the times I looked in on you you either had very little or no saves (beyond warcry or a bless). For 100% sure, anytime I saw you get age-withered, you weren't packing.
Seeing the change in age on your score wouldn't be bad, although it would involve a medium-size rewrite of how age works period (since you're not actually aging, as it stands.)
|
|
|
|
      |
Aiekooso | Wed 24-May-06 09:16 PM |
Member since 18th Dec 2003
305 posts
| |
|
#13270, "Oh hell?"
In response to Reply #6
|
Seeing the change in age on your score wouldn't be bad, although it would involve a medium-size rewrite of how age works period (since you're not actually aging, as it stands.)
You don't see the age change? Does this apply to items also?
|
|
|
|
        |
Grurk Muouk | Thu 25-May-06 07:51 AM |
Member since 15th Mar 2004
538 posts
| |
|
#13271, "RE: Oh hell?"
In response to Reply #7
|
Those affects subract from your total...
So.. Im a human and when I roll I'm going to live 80 years.
Wither... 72 years now... Age item... 70 years now...
Neither of those would show in your total age, since you are still the same age (code wise), though I know the echos surrounding wearing a +Age item make it seem "You age before your eyes or something."
Hope that all makes sense...
|
|
|
|
          |
Marcus_ | Thu 25-May-06 11:22 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
681 posts
| |
|
#13272, "Age items are included in your score age."
In response to Reply #8
|
It's just wither that's sneaky like that.
|
|
|
|
            |
Theerkla | Thu 25-May-06 12:26 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#13273, "The echos for each basically explain it"
In response to Reply #9
|
When you put on +age gear, you "age before your eyes" - get older. When you get racked by wither "years get ripped off your life" or some such echo - the age you are going to die just got smaller.
|
|
|
|
              | |
|