|
Lightmage | Thu 18-Aug-05 07:50 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
319 posts
| |
|
#10010, "Jaguar form idea"
|
Picture this. Some kind of creep ability for the Jaguar. Only in forests. It can camo and sneak around in forested areas, pouncing out for its ambush strike. I dont actually mind this form despite all the complaints people have in regards to it. Ive lost track on how many shifters have stated 'Long as I dont get jaguar or panther' when talking about what they hope for. With the creep, I can see this as one of the most sought after forms for Outlander mages, ect. I know it kinda makes the form Utility, but whatever!! What do you IMMs think of that idea?
Hope is the worst of evils, for it prolongs the torment of man.
|
|
|
|
Come on IMMS, you responded to PLAYER HOUSES!! PLAYER ...,
Lightmage,
19-Aug-05 04:58 PM, #2
RE: Come on IMMS, you responded to PLAYER HOUSES!! PLA...,
Valguarnera,
19-Aug-05 06:12 PM, #3
RE: Come on IMMS, you responded to PLAYER HOUSES!! PLA...,
Qaledus,
19-Aug-05 06:28 PM, #4
Once again, Qaledus ####in rawx. I may have to roll a p...,
Aodh,
19-Aug-05 09:53 PM, #5
Good News!,
Quezzumpliet,
23-Aug-05 09:21 PM, #6
personally what I think the form needs,
incognito,
19-Aug-05 02:34 AM, #1
| |
|
Lightmage | Fri 19-Aug-05 04:58 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
319 posts
| |
|
#10035, "Come on IMMS, you responded to PLAYER HOUSES!! PLAYER ..."
In response to Reply #0
|
Is this not a good idea or what!!!!
Damn, I need some sleep. Hope is the worst of evils, for it prolongs the torment of man.
|
|
|
|
  |
Valguarnera | Fri 19-Aug-05 06:12 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
| |
|
#10036, "RE: Come on IMMS, you responded to PLAYER HOUSES!! PLA..."
In response to Reply #2
|
I'd argue player houses is a more interesting issue than a small tweak to a single shapeshifter form, especially the details of why players want them, why some other games provide them, etc. I think it's a bad idea for CF, but I think there's a lot to be said about why.
As for jaguars: I have read the post, and I have no opinion one way or the other. Hey, you asked. With excessive punctuation and lots of capital letters, so we know you're serious.
As for posts: I prefer natural selection. If you post something and not many people respond after a while has passed, just let it die a natural death. The self-bumping thing gets annoying if lots of people start doing it.
valguarnera@carrionfields.com
|
|
|
|
  |
Qaledus | Fri 19-Aug-05 06:27 PM |
Member since 09th May 2004
458 posts
| |
|
#10037, "RE: Come on IMMS, you responded to PLAYER HOUSES!! PLA..."
In response to Reply #2
Edited on Fri 19-Aug-05 06:28 PM
|
I support it, in fact this very idea has been on my list for some time, but in the context of a much larger make-shifters-more-better campaign. New forms, more sensible socials, a wider variety of things to do in combat (even if you just have two things to choose from) regardless of focus, etc.
Qaledus
ps: I can't believe the player houses thread response either.
|
|
|
|
    |
Aodh | Fri 19-Aug-05 09:53 PM |
Member since 06th Jan 2005
352 posts
| |
|
#10038, "Once again, Qaledus ####in rawx. I may have to roll a p..."
In response to Reply #4
|
|
|
|
incognito | Fri 19-Aug-05 02:34 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#10023, "personally what I think the form needs"
In response to Reply #0
|
Is the ability to see camo in the same room as it.
I could never use my ambush ability because rager rangers always ambushed me whilst I was waiting to ambush someone else.
|
|
|
|
|