|
|
#3383, "Enlarge vs polearm warriors"
|
I found that in every form that i have, i cannot hit warrior with the polearm (all tiers). Will enlarge help with that at least a little bit, or I am fated to forever avoid polearm warriors?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Lion vs polespec log,
Marcus_,
21-Aug-11 01:48 AM, #25
Impressive difference.,
shifter (Anonymous),
21-Aug-11 03:05 PM, #26
RE: Enlarge vs polearm warriors,
Sugabear,
18-Aug-11 05:39 AM, #10
I was speaking of the villagers,
shifter (Anonymous),
18-Aug-11 06:34 AM, #12
RE: Enlarge vs polearm warriors,
Daevryn,
17-Aug-11 08:22 AM, #1
ugh... advice?,
shifter (Anonymous),
17-Aug-11 12:59 PM, #2
So you don't have fumble? nt,
incognito,
17-Aug-11 01:32 PM, #3
spellbane + nodisarm + noremove (nt),
shifter (Anonymous),
18-Aug-11 06:35 AM, #13
RE: spellbane + nodisarm + noremove (nt),
incognito,
18-Aug-11 11:53 AM, #18
Hell polearm, dragon halberd, AP polearm I think. nt,
Artificial,
18-Aug-11 12:06 PM, #22
RE: Hell polearm, dragon halberd, AP polearm I think. n...,
incognito,
19-Aug-11 12:01 PM, #23
RE: ugh... advice?,
Nreykre,
17-Aug-11 03:39 PM, #4
Did you seriously just suggest revert fumble as first r...,
Lhydia,
17-Aug-11 06:01 PM, #5
Kind of.,
Nreykre,
17-Aug-11 06:45 PM, #6
Problem is that fumble spell lag means warrior has his ...,
Abernyte,
18-Aug-11 04:40 AM, #9
Remember the warrior will be using spec moves on you,
incognito,
18-Aug-11 11:54 AM, #20
I did,
incognito,
18-Aug-11 11:54 AM, #19
Really?,
shifter (Anonymous),
18-Aug-11 12:35 AM, #7
RE: Really?,
Asthiss,
18-Aug-11 02:28 AM, #8
List please,
shifter (Anonymous),
18-Aug-11 06:32 AM, #11
I've had two hero shifters in the last few years..,
Java,
18-Aug-11 07:18 AM, #14
I am not arguing,
shifter (Anonymous),
18-Aug-11 07:35 AM, #15
RE: I am not arguing,
Asthiss,
18-Aug-11 08:05 AM, #17
RE: I've had two hero shifters in the last few years..,
Isildur,
20-Aug-11 11:42 PM, #24
That must be a cavefisher form?,
shifter (Anonymous),
24-Aug-11 02:42 PM, #27
Ram for sure. I get that form every time I pick offens...,
Straklaw,
24-Aug-11 03:34 PM, #28
Ram can do fairly well with it.,
Gabrucin (Anonymous),
25-Aug-11 05:50 AM, #29
Butt lags. Same as Rake.,
Straklaw,
25-Aug-11 05:45 PM, #30
RE: Really?,
Nreykre,
18-Aug-11 08:05 AM, #16
You're just trying to avoid being proven wrong,
incognito,
18-Aug-11 12:00 PM, #21
| |
|
Marcus_ | Sun 21-Aug-11 01:48 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
681 posts
| |
|
#3410, "Lion vs polespec log"
In response to Reply #0
|
In the log below, you can see a lion vs pole spec fight. As you can see, the lion did hit the polespec quite a bit. (Although the lion was a scion with ABS, so he could take quite a beating too..)
Also, unless the warrior is blind or you have someone else tanking, just forget about fumble. Swipe, on the other hand, is generally a good idea vs pole/spear specs.
http://www.qhcf.net/phorum/read.php?3,812185,812185#msg-812185
|
|
|
|
  |
|
#3411, "Impressive difference."
In response to Reply #25
|
I will post my logs later, you will see why I was curious aobut tactics. Now I just see that some forms are good vs polearms and some suck
Thanks for the log!
|
|
|
|
|
Sugabear | Thu 18-Aug-11 05:39 AM |
Member since 04th Oct 2010
42 posts
| |
|
#3394, "RE: Enlarge vs polearm warriors"
In response to Reply #0
|
If he isnt a rager, then he is probably enlarged which makes his tanking more viable. Try to revert and dispel his enlarge. As long as he is wielding his polearm there is very minimal chance that he has a way to lag you, unless you are fleeing.
By dispeling his enlarge he will tank worse, and he may even switch to his other spec. If that happens, you get the chance to fight him without using his polearm. That may or may not be more beneficial to you.
|
|
|
|
  |
|
#3396, "I was speaking of the villagers"
In response to Reply #10
|
As well as nodisarm/nremove polearms. I'm trying to find the way, but still couldn't research anything smart
|
|
|
|
|
Daevryn | Wed 17-Aug-11 08:22 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#3385, "RE: Enlarge vs polearm warriors"
In response to Reply #0
|
You can't be enlarged while shifted into another form.
|
|
|
|
  |
|
#3386, "ugh... advice?"
In response to Reply #1
|
How to fight polearmers as a shifter (without ganging them)? Because with all protections/spells/abs I have zero a chance. Help?
|
|
|
|
    |
incognito | Wed 17-Aug-11 01:32 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#3387, "So you don't have fumble? nt"
In response to Reply #2
|
|
|
      |
|
#3397, "spellbane + nodisarm + noremove (nt)"
In response to Reply #3
|
|
|
        |
incognito | Thu 18-Aug-11 11:53 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#3402, "RE: spellbane + nodisarm + noremove (nt)"
In response to Reply #13
|
In which case, you're not just talking about polearm warriors.
Most polearm warriors don't have these things.
Want to name me some nodisarm polearms?
Want to name me any half-decent noremove polearms?
Or are you complaining that as a shifter you struggle against a villager? In which case, it's not pole specs, it's village pole specs.
Incidentally, you could have said fist of the titans too, but every warrior that takes that gives up something else.
|
|
|
|
          | |
            |
incognito | Fri 19-Aug-11 12:01 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#3408, "RE: Hell polearm, dragon halberd, AP polearm I think. n..."
In response to Reply #22
|
I don't think the AP one is, although I might be thinking that just because I unholy blessed it.
The others are certainly not easy to come by.
Really, they are exceptional to see in play, so this guys original point "shifters can't be polespecs" shouldn't be looking at this case.
|
|
|
|
          |
Abernyte | Thu 18-Aug-11 04:40 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
975 posts
| |
|
#3393, "Problem is that fumble spell lag means warrior has his ..."
In response to Reply #6
|
so you have to blind them first, which only one land form does and some pecking forms do. SO you might have to blind with a talisman, scroll or wand, then fumble. In this short time you are getting your arse handed to you in melee as even a 100% parry shifter tanks like a brick compared to a voker, conjurer or muter for some reason.
I would say, avoid them.
|
|
|
|
            |
incognito | Thu 18-Aug-11 11:54 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#3404, "Remember the warrior will be using spec moves on you"
In response to Reply #9
|
So will also be lagging himself.
|
|
|
|
        |
incognito | Thu 18-Aug-11 11:54 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#3403, "I did"
In response to Reply #5
|
Because he said he was fully dam reduxed.
|
|
|
|
      |
|
#3391, "Really?"
In response to Reply #4
|
"If you're looking for a class that allows for serious customization (that you actually control), especially on the fly, shapeshifter probably isn't for you."
a) ANY shapeshifter form becomes totally useless vs ANY noob with the polearm (tested on 6 different 1st tier form). Maybe there is a form that can do something vs polearm, but I am unaware.
b) Fumble is not an option vs battle or vs nodisarm/noremove weapons.
Are you saying that whole shapeshifter class must be totally rocked by anyone wielding a polearm?
That's nonsense. There must be a way to at least increase chances and not losing 100% out of the 100%. I just didn't find it and thought maybe someone have an idea, but your ideas are pretty useless, no offense.
|
|
|
|
        |
Asthiss | Thu 18-Aug-11 02:26 AM |
Member since 26th Oct 2004
191 posts
| |
|
#3392, "RE: Really?"
In response to Reply #7
Edited on Thu 18-Aug-11 02:28 AM
|
Your bite command should still go in every round. So even though you do not hit them during normal combat rounds you'll make some damage. So you could use that to flee heal up and go back and bite.
The balance in CF is that there will always be a match up that you will have trouble with no matter what race/class combo you choose.
edited to add this: And no we aren't saying that the hole shapeshifter class gets rocked by polearms. But perhaps your forms do.
|
|
|
|
          |
|
#3395, "List please"
In response to Reply #8
|
Please, name the forms that are hitting polearm warriors good.
I do not flame, but I from what I have seen/tested, jaguar, rhino, lion, gorilla, porcupine, wolverine are not hitting them. If you have logs, would be great to read them or have the prooflink.
|
|
|
|
            |
Java | Thu 18-Aug-11 07:18 AM |
Member since 07th Apr 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#3398, "I've had two hero shifters in the last few years.."
In response to Reply #11
|
Neither were PK powerhouses, but I can't recall polearm specs (and there were a few in Battle.. there always are) giving me issues. I had the gator and rhino.
Obviously Porcupine isn't even in this discussion (it's toasted by any two-hand weapon, obviously). The rest though, I would guarantee you are a combination of RNG, small sample size or selective memory (ie, you only remember the bad times, you don't notice when things go normally).
I don't think anyone needs to prove anything to you, just as you don't need to prove anything to us. You have veterans and extremely skilled PKers (no, I'm not counting myself as that) telling you something. You can either believe it, or not.
But if you prefer, you can just continue to assume that pole specs are an extremely poor matchup for your shifter. That's fine. When I played a Shaman, I knew that Liches were an extremely poor matchup. As an Orc, I know to avoid Druids. Every class is good against others, and bad against others. Think of CF as an extremely advanced game of Rock-Paper-Scissors. Sure, sometimes Scissors can beat Rock, but don't expect it to happen a lot.
|
|
|
|
              |
|
#3399, "I am not arguing"
In response to Reply #14
|
Nor trying to prove anything, just want to see logs, if there are any. If you have it, or know names on which I could do the search, I would be grateful.
My rhino sucked big deal vs polearmers, too bad I've lost most of my longs and of that rhino too. It was at the time when rhino was added to the game, so maybe since that time form was changed, I don't know.
|
|
|
|
                |
Asthiss | Thu 18-Aug-11 08:01 AM |
Member since 26th Oct 2004
191 posts
| |
|
#3401, "RE: I am not arguing"
In response to Reply #15
Edited on Thu 18-Aug-11 08:05 AM
|
|
|
              | |
                |
|
#3412, "That must be a cavefisher form?"
In response to Reply #24
|
I've heard it's not too good in melee, or is it not true? Can it lag opponent at all?
But yes, weaponbreaker seems to be a good idea!
|
|
|
|
                  | |
                    |
|
#3414, "Ram can do fairly well with it."
In response to Reply #28
|
It may count as bone but I fought Mubs recently and in the 2nd round of combat I shattered his conquest axe, which caused him to flee at disgusting cuts and run away for some reason.
So a huge heavy steel axe is doable!
Only gripe with Ram is the lack of lagging ability. Everyone gets away convulsing!
|
|
|
|
                      | |
        |
Nreykre | Thu 18-Aug-11 07:43 AM |
Member since 05th Apr 2011
90 posts
| |
|
#3400, "RE: Really?"
In response to Reply #7
Edited on Thu 18-Aug-11 08:05 AM
|
A lot of forms get a skill that does unblockable damage, beyond bite. If you didn't get one in the forms lottery this time around, then it's understandable you're going to have trouble with very defensive melee types. It may not be enough against certain warriors even with substantial damage reduction, but them's the breaks.
Edit to add: I'd have to look harder than I care to for a polearm specific example, but I do recall going up against a few ragers with Nreykre who I hardly ever hit in combat. With proper prepping, gore spam was enough to fend them off almost every time.
My guess is that the fact that many shapeshifter forms have an achilles heel or two is by design.
Suffice to say, I'd be inclined to agree that as a shapeshifter with a form that isn't adequately suited for fighting battle giant polearm spec, there probably aren't any tactics short of calling a gang that are going to reliably swing the fight by a high enough margin to satisfy you.
For what it's worth: I bet you've played builds that made someone else think, "Damn, my build just CAN'T beat this guy no matter what I do." In some cases, that person may actually be correct. In others, they're just not being clever enough. Either way, I've always been under the impression that dilemmas like that were by design, especially in the case of a class where your build and therefore your range of tactics are randomly assigned to you in the first place.
|
|
|
|
        |
incognito | Thu 18-Aug-11 12:00 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#3405, "You're just trying to avoid being proven wrong"
In response to Reply #7
|
How often to you fight someone with a nodisarm polearm, hmm?
Let's look at it this way. Who deals more damage? A polespec or a lion with protections up? Probably the lion. Same with a number of other forms.
What you seem to be saying is "Waah. Why can't I ever beat a BATTLE warrior WITH the head who has a NODISARM weapon WITH MY FORMS that are not a good matchup." when in fact, most polespecs will not be using a nodisarm or noremove weapon, and battle is only one out of many cabals (albeit one with a higher concentration of warriors).
And before you run out there, and find the fumble tactic fails when you try it, I'm not saying it will work the majority of times. I AM saying that it will allow you to get the better of a polespec sometimes, and if, as you claim, you're all buffed up, you won't really be at any risk, outside of the village.
Since you're bound to contrive another situation, I'll add "unless of course, you let yourself get hamstrung, arteried, hurled and silenced first".
|
|
|
|
|