RE: (DELETED) [FORTRESS] Zurra Nika the Banisher of Fea...,
Zurra (Anonymous),
16-Feb-17 07:03 PM, #2
Good and bad,
Destuvius,
16-Feb-17 07:33 PM, #3
Because,
Bemused,
16-Feb-17 07:55 PM, #5
RE: Good and bad,
Isildur,
16-Feb-17 08:10 PM, #6
Non-empowerment,
Destuvius,
16-Feb-17 08:40 PM, #7
RE: Non-empowerment,
Java,
17-Feb-17 02:21 AM, #13
RE: Good and bad,
Bemused,
16-Feb-17 08:47 PM, #8
RE: Good and bad,
Isildur,
16-Feb-17 10:37 PM, #12
Not my character, but for clarification,
Tac,
16-Feb-17 09:13 PM, #9
RE: Not my character, but for clarification,
Destuvius,
16-Feb-17 09:25 PM, #10
RE: Not my character, but for clarification,
Demos,
16-Feb-17 10:09 PM, #11
Eh...,
Lhydia,
17-Feb-17 07:01 AM, #14
I played several Forties and never saw this...,
Tac,
17-Feb-17 08:34 AM, #15
RE: I played several Forties and never saw this...,
Java,
17-Feb-17 11:09 AM, #16
omg Ignolmeer this. ,
Lhydia,
17-Feb-17 03:08 PM, #17
You missed the point. ,
Ignolmeer,
17-Feb-17 08:45 PM, #18
The whole point is..,
Lhydia,
17-Feb-17 10:04 PM, #20
RE: The whole point is..,
Java,
18-Feb-17 07:22 AM, #21
I feel like,
Kstatida,
20-Feb-17 04:19 AM, #22
Others get it. We just aren't attention whores. :) NT,
TMNS,
20-Feb-17 10:13 AM, #23
I guess what isn't being conveyed here is...,
Ignolmeer,
28-Feb-17 04:39 PM, #24
RE: (DELETED) [FORTRESS] Zurra Nika the Banisher of Fea...,
Orsil (Anonymous),
16-Feb-17 07:52 PM, #4
I'll Echo Destuvius. Good and Bad.,
Ignolmeer,
17-Feb-17 09:07 PM, #19
This character was awesome. Sorry your IMM went AWOL :...,
TMNS,
16-Feb-17 07:01 PM, #1
| |
|
|
#130375, "RE: (DELETED) [FORTRESS] Zurra Nika the Banisher of Fea..."
In response to Reply #0
|
Deormdel was avaialable for about ten minutes, total, in two seperate interactions, across four months. He answered zero notes and one email. That took him two months. Although it did correct the mistaken impression I was under for most of this character's life that I was partially empowered and would need to talk him about a task I was given for more.
He was known for the first half of this character's life, in wizlist, as something like, 'around often nearly every day', and in the second half, 'Some hours between 5-9 as time allows. Best to note/email as well as pray'. In each of our interactions and in email, he said he would be available more, or at some specific time, and wasn't. It's hard to express exactly how frustrating this was. But very.
I had fun with this character in spite of the empowerment experience doing everything it could to ruin it, basically.
|
|
|
|
    |
Bemused | Thu 16-Feb-17 07:55 PM |
Member since 15th Oct 2013
665 posts
| |
|
#130378, "Because"
In response to Reply #3
|
The limitations placed on un-empowered characters mean that empowerment is not actually optional at all.
|
|
|
|
      |
Bemused | Thu 16-Feb-17 08:47 PM |
Member since 15th Oct 2013
665 posts
| |
|
#130381, "RE: Good and bad"
In response to Reply #6
|
1) Healing through supplications has been reduced by 30% for any communer who is not empowered. 2) When not empowered, ALL level 21+ supplications are communed with a -1 level penalty (e.g., ignoring other modifiers, an umempowered L51 paladin would commune wrath at level 50 instead of 51).
Also un-empowered Paladins get no virtues, shamans get no paths.
So whilst technically it is optional, it realistically isn't. It shows how little the Imms actually spend, you know, playing the game instead of whacking people with their rulers.
|
|
|
|
    |
Tac | Thu 16-Feb-17 09:12 PM |
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2050 posts
| |
|
#130382, "Not my character, but for clarification"
In response to Reply #3
Edited on Thu 16-Feb-17 09:13 PM
|
>Bad: You seemed to only really care about PK and even went as >far as to perform a handful of what could be considered "bad" >RP things. One that sticks out the most was how you would >boast about being the most deadly paladin in Thera or other >assorted things that just don't really jive with being a >great paladin.
This sounds like you are saying the only way to play a "great" paladin is to be humble...
Is not a paladin the ultimate instrument of smiting the #### out of evil? Assuming you aren't playing Joe Humble, wouldn't it be perfectly acceptable to walk around like the badass evil destroyer you are (especially when it is true, AFAIK in this case)? If only evils can be PK successful and have any pride in it... that would be good to know.
Also virtues are far from optional from the paladin class, which, in my opinion, is seriously broken in a not fun and bad way.
|
|
|
|
      |
Demos | Thu 16-Feb-17 10:09 PM |
Member since 20th Apr 2003
211 posts
| |
|
#130384, "RE: Not my character, but for clarification"
In response to Reply #9
|
Humility is sort of built into the class. I always kind of found it to be implied through help files & such that it was the case. I think being confident of your pk chops is one thing but bragging is another. Maybe that's what they sort of meant? Cb talk of x being dead and or weak etc feels fairly unpaladiny to me. Idunno if that happened though so Wtf do I know.
|
|
|
|
        |
Tac | Fri 17-Feb-17 08:34 AM |
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2050 posts
| |
|
#130394, "I played several Forties and never saw this..."
In response to Reply #14
|
But that doesn't mean it didn't happen. I imagine it was more prevalent toward the end when the frustration of building a character that requires Imm intervention to be all it can be and having that process fail you bubbled over.
I can certainly empathize with that frustration, though I'd never stick it out as long as he did.
If you are RP forbidden from being a badass that knows they are badass as a Maran, then we've RP enforced this trope, "evil will always triumph because good is dumb".
|
|
|
|
          | |
            | |
              |
Ignolmeer | Fri 17-Feb-17 08:45 PM |
Member since 16th Nov 2016
77 posts
| |
|
#130400, "You missed the point. "
In response to Reply #17
|
Ignolmeer's religion is base on the freedom of choice and that mortals are fated to make certain ones in their life. If it is one thousand SUBTLE choices or one earth shattering decision, it is still a choice to act. If you talk yourself into going down a slippery slope of, "well this isn't THAT bad," and then find yourself at the pit of evil you can look back and see the path which you chose to come down. Ignolmeer holds the weight of decision upon the individual. So you DO have to be trying.
Just because the emperor puts a dagger in your hand and says you must choose to kill your mother or father doesn't mean you are bereft of the guilt or sin in choosing one of them. Those were not your ONLY choices.
I hope you see my point here, and leads you to better understand Ignolmeer's religion.
|
|
|
|
                | |
                  | |
                  |
Kstatida | Mon 20-Feb-17 04:19 AM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#130420, "I feel like"
In response to Reply #20
|
You're the only guy here who understands Fortress and Maran really indepth. Think of the irony.
You almost make me want to roll one. Almost.
|
|
|
|
                    |
TMNS | Mon 20-Feb-17 10:13 AM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#130423, "Others get it. We just aren't attention whores. :) NT"
In response to Reply #22
|
|
|
                  |
Ignolmeer | Tue 28-Feb-17 04:37 PM |
Member since 16th Nov 2016
77 posts
| |
|
#130538, "I guess what isn't being conveyed here is..."
In response to Reply #20
Edited on Tue 28-Feb-17 04:39 PM
|
Maran are not infallible, and they will sometimes choose an option that may be overtly evil or it may be insidious. Where the disconnect is where one thinks Ignolmeer finds the Acolyte to have no purpose. They will forever be the guide back to the right path, and an anchor that tethers the Maran from the vacuum of evil. Ignolmeer sees this perfectly well. All people will ultimately CHOOSE what they do cognitively or subconsciously through repetition or complacency, and Ignolmeer will hold them accountable to it all.
If no maran would ever choose evil actions then one of the prime directives of Acolytes is moot.
Does that clarify the disconnet and put us on the same page?
*edit typed from phone.
|
|
|
|
  |
|
#130377, "RE: (DELETED) [FORTRESS] Zurra Nika the Banisher of Fea..."
In response to Reply #2
|
Hey! I had a lot of fun discussing everything with you. Sorry about the whole "Eyes" thing. . .GLWYN
|
|
|
|
  |
Ignolmeer | Fri 17-Feb-17 09:07 PM |
Member since 16th Nov 2016
77 posts
| |
|
#130401, "I'll Echo Destuvius. Good and Bad."
In response to Reply #2
|
I observed you many times as I looked for leadership potential in the Marans. Your PK list was admirable, but I rarely saw RP out of you. It was good when you decided to do it.
In light of your attitude though, it was soured player bleeding through.
While Destuvius does have a HIGH standard of paladins (and IMHO everything - which isnt' bad), the following are clear cut lines you crossed as a paladin.
From the Paladin Code help file (as it has been for decades):
1. Live to be the guiding light for all to follow and look towards. Your beliefs must be as solid as your loyalty is to your god.
7. Be fair of speech and actions.
10. Do not become like those you fight. Respect, Integrity, Valor.
Bad mouthing your god, a being that is the core of your reason to do what you do, is blasphemous and extremely hypocritical. It is counter to everything a paladin is.
When given an open forum to speak your mind that does not mean a paladin should be disrespectful in tone and speech. Especially when the one giving freedom to speak was both a leader of the Fortress and a god.
If being able to kill evil was the ONLY task of a paladin you would have been at the top of the list, but it isn't.
There were so many glimmers of potential, an example being you taking other Maran/Squire to task about the second order effects of being wanted. I hope to see more of that stellar RP in your next character.
GLWYN
|
|
|
|
|
TMNS | Thu 16-Feb-17 07:01 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#130374, "This character was awesome. Sorry your IMM went AWOL :..."
In response to Reply #0
|
I really liked Zurra, FWIW.
|
|
|
|
|