Did you play Yagarek (sp?) too?,
Kraken71,
30-Mar-12 05:30 AM, #41
Yagharek was a guy I went to High School with.,
TMNS,
30-Mar-12 09:35 AM, #42
RE: Yagharek was a guy I went to High School with.,
Kraken71,
30-Mar-12 09:16 PM, #44
I don't think I even played in his times nt,
MRSK,
30-Mar-12 12:32 PM, #43
Big thanks to whoever picked up the PBF nt,
MRSK,
29-Mar-12 03:04 PM, #40
RE: (DELETED) [None] Eleagra Gurkral the Legend of the ...,
HammerSong,
27-Mar-12 05:35 PM, #19
RE: (DELETED) [None] Eleagra Gurkral the Legend of the ...,
MRSK,
28-Mar-12 02:46 PM, #21
One thing.,
Dallevian,
28-Mar-12 02:49 PM, #22
RE: One thing.,
MRSK,
28-Mar-12 03:09 PM, #23
RE: One thing.,
Daevryn,
28-Mar-12 03:12 PM, #25
Absolutely,
MRSK,
28-Mar-12 03:31 PM, #26
RE: Absolutely,
Daevryn,
28-Mar-12 04:37 PM, #29
Ok, I'm fine with it nt,
MRSK,
28-Mar-12 04:46 PM, #31
RE: Ok, I'm fine with it nt,
Daevryn,
29-Mar-12 09:07 AM, #36
IMHO a lot to respect with this char. Lot to shake you...,
TMNS,
29-Mar-12 01:21 PM, #37
It isn't your decision on if they come back or not.,
Dallevian,
28-Mar-12 03:47 PM, #28
RE: It isn't your decision on if they come back or not.,
MRSK,
28-Mar-12 04:44 PM, #30
What I'm saying,
Dallevian,
28-Mar-12 04:53 PM, #32
RE: What I'm saying,
MRSK,
28-Mar-12 04:59 PM, #33
What's funny is he's saying you did what he did.,
TMNS,
28-Mar-12 05:02 PM, #34
RE: It isn't your decision on if they come back or not.,
N b M,
28-Mar-12 06:17 PM, #35
Oh Forsaken. You had to learn that lesson the hard way...,
TMNS,
28-Mar-12 03:12 PM, #24
Exactly. Sad face to see that char go out like that. ...,
Dallevian,
28-Mar-12 03:44 PM, #27
Great Char but how did he skirt the perma rules?,
Curious Observer (Anonymous),
27-Mar-12 02:47 PM, #15
Re: permagroup,
Straklaw,
27-Mar-12 03:01 PM, #16
Zulg and I discussed it, actually,
Twist,
27-Mar-12 03:36 PM, #17
Some kind of goodbuys,
MRSK,
27-Mar-12 10:50 AM, #6
RE: Some kind of goodbuys,
Daevryn,
27-Mar-12 11:11 AM, #7
RE: Some kind of goodbuys,
MRSK,
27-Mar-12 12:26 PM, #9
As an aside note,
MRSK,
27-Mar-12 12:54 PM, #10
Further aside,
Dallevian,
27-Mar-12 01:22 PM, #12
This.,
Daevryn,
27-Mar-12 01:30 PM, #13
Re: Qiirvaas,
Twist,
27-Mar-12 01:21 PM, #11
RE: Re: Qiirvaas,
Enlilth,
27-Mar-12 01:42 PM, #14
RE: Re: Qiirvaas,
MRSK,
27-Mar-12 03:44 PM, #18
RE: Some kind of goodbuys,
Enlilth,
27-Mar-12 11:20 AM, #8
RE: Some kind of goodbuys,
Yargy/Garwern (Anonymous),
27-Mar-12 08:16 PM, #20
Boo for forgetting Arleri.,
TMNS,
29-Mar-12 01:23 PM, #38
RE: Boo for forgetting Arleri.,
MRSK,
29-Mar-12 02:28 PM, #39
Damn you were tough!,
Lethmitel (Anonymous),
27-Mar-12 12:35 AM, #5
Damnit all! You elusive bitch!,
Kurbrawn (Anonymous),
26-Mar-12 09:52 PM, #4
In general I liked this character.,
Twist,
26-Mar-12 09:05 PM, #3
Sad to see,
Bolzhor (Anonymous),
26-Mar-12 06:24 PM, #2
RE: (DELETED) [None] Eleagra Gurkral the Legend of the ...,
Odrallag,
26-Mar-12 06:18 PM, #1
| |
|
Kraken71 | Fri 30-Mar-12 05:30 AM |
Member since 04th Aug 2006
34 posts
| |
|
#107848, "Did you play Yagarek (sp?) too?"
In response to Reply #0
|
I had my first Empire char under him. You reminded me of him.
|
|
|
|
    |
Kraken71 | Fri 30-Mar-12 09:16 PM |
Member since 04th Aug 2006
34 posts
| |
|
#107874, "RE: Yagharek was a guy I went to High School with."
In response to Reply #42
|
I just read his battlefield post when I found out he is spelled Yagharek, and it seems his english is pretty american.
The name has a touch of russian I think and he didn't talk much.
|
|
|
|
  |
MRSK | Fri 30-Mar-12 12:32 PM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
| |
|
#107862, "I don't think I even played in his times nt"
In response to Reply #41
|
|
|
|
MRSK | Thu 29-Mar-12 03:04 PM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
| |
|
#107843, "Big thanks to whoever picked up the PBF nt"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
    |
Dallevian | Wed 28-Mar-12 02:49 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1639 posts
| |
|
#107805, "One thing."
In response to Reply #21
|
It isn't your place to rationalize killing or not killing an anathema. Even if he was your best friend (in character besties), he is anathema. You and your blood oath dictates that you kill him. He's ENEMY #1.
|
|
|
|
      |
MRSK | Wed 28-Mar-12 03:09 PM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
| |
|
#107806, "RE: One thing."
In response to Reply #22
|
It's your take on it. If it was true, there would be no anathemas returned back.
|
|
|
|
        |
Daevryn | Wed 28-Mar-12 03:12 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#107808, "RE: One thing."
In response to Reply #23
|
>It's your take on it. If it was true, there would be no >anathemas returned back.
In my perfect world there wouldn't be. I frequently regret coding the unanathema command, which was created because for some reason Tureanthen kept anathing people totally by mistake.
But that being said, regardless of what your character or RP take is on it, you do understand that by Empire Dogma an Anathema is enemy #1 right? And that by not murdering one when you can you're taking as much of a risk as a Battle guy who decides to let a mage live, etc.?
|
|
|
|
          |
MRSK | Wed 28-Mar-12 03:31 PM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
| |
|
#107809, "Absolutely"
In response to Reply #25
|
Would Raeghan catch me up with that and demote/anathema without any word I'd be perfectly fine with it.
|
|
|
|
            |
Daevryn | Wed 28-Mar-12 04:37 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#107812, "RE: Absolutely"
In response to Reply #26
|
You're also rolling the dice that Enlilth or Zulg might.
When you're breaking a specific leader's rules, you usually only have to worry about them. When you're violating the rules of your cabal, all bets are off.
|
|
|
|
              |
MRSK | Wed 28-Mar-12 04:46 PM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
| |
|
#107814, "Ok, I'm fine with it nt"
In response to Reply #29
|
|
|
                |
Daevryn | Thu 29-Mar-12 09:07 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#107830, "RE: Ok, I'm fine with it nt"
In response to Reply #31
|
I can't remember if I've said as much yet, but I wanted to add that I respect you for sticking it out so long as an anathema. That's hard for a lot of people to manage.
|
|
|
|
                  |
TMNS | Thu 29-Mar-12 01:21 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#107836, "IMHO a lot to respect with this char. Lot to shake you..."
In response to Reply #36
|
Had the potential to be another Hunsobo (though for me she kinda was, saw nothing but good things from the character).
|
|
|
|
        |
Dallevian | Wed 28-Mar-12 03:47 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1639 posts
| |
|
#107811, "It isn't your decision on if they come back or not."
In response to Reply #23
|
Your character should care less, should feel compelled to acknowledge them as a primary target and deal with them.
You're also fine in walking that rope of not doing it but the only reason you're really getting away with it at that point is due to lack of immortal/leader oversight.
|
|
|
|
          |
MRSK | Wed 28-Mar-12 04:44 PM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
| |
|
#107813, "RE: It isn't your decision on if they come back or not."
In response to Reply #28
|
Now you are trying to tell me how MY char should think and act. Rather pointless. I knew the risks and was ready to pay for my actions. I actualy did in that mask episode. Again anathema thing is Imperial Law not the game rule. So here my char is free to interpree it again with all coming risks.
|
|
|
|
            |
Dallevian | Wed 28-Mar-12 04:53 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1639 posts
| |
|
#107815, "What I'm saying"
In response to Reply #30
|
is that you took a blood oath. It isn't something you simply say but a binding of your character's soul to imperial law. There should be some compulsion from this, meaning, your character shouldn't really have the opportunity to rationalize it away. He's compelled to act through the blood oath.
I say this as a guy who had a character made anathema for overlooking/helping another wrongfully made anathema character. At the time, I thought, my char will just do what is best for him. Wrong thinking.
|
|
|
|
              |
MRSK | Wed 28-Mar-12 04:59 PM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
| |
|
#107816, "RE: What I'm saying"
In response to Reply #32
|
I understand what you are saying. Still will keep up to my opinion. So let's just agree to disagree.
|
|
|
|
                | |
            |
N b M | Wed 28-Mar-12 06:17 PM |
Member since 29th Sep 2005
444 posts
| |
|
#107818, "RE: It isn't your decision on if they come back or not."
In response to Reply #30
|
How your character would act, or how you as a player would act?
You can't really spout out "My character would act this way and that way" when you haven't put the slightest role in, or any semblance of a history of role play to back up your going completely against cabal dogma. In some cases it may work (See Hralpelk), but in your case where there was nothing to back up your actions, no... it really wouldn't.
And once again I shall finish by saying that if you put in even a semi-effort at putting forth some history to the character and playing that character as that role would dictate, you would be one of our top tier players across the board, no questions asked.
|
|
|
|
      |
TMNS | Wed 28-Mar-12 03:12 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#107807, "Oh Forsaken. You had to learn that lesson the hard way..."
In response to Reply #22
|
Menzaen and the girdle, no?
|
|
|
|
        |
Dallevian | Wed 28-Mar-12 03:44 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1639 posts
| |
|
#107810, "Exactly. Sad face to see that char go out like that. ..."
In response to Reply #24
|
|
|
|
|
#107792, "Great Char but how did he skirt the perma rules?"
In response to Reply #0
|
*disclaimer: I don't want this to start a troll because I thought Eleagra was a solid character.
Was it because of the big powerswing from the fort that the imms ignored the fact that for a long period of time Seisorold (SP? that empire/anathema bard)and Eleagra were a perma. I don't want to accuse them off OOC coordination because I both have no evidence for it and don't think that fact matters based on the helpfile.
PERMAGROUP PERMA-GROUP 'PERMA GROUP' (930) A 'permagroup' is defined as two or more characters who rarely do anything without the other. In essence, if you very rarely adventure without a particular person, you are part of a permagroup. (Logging in and sitting in your guild or gathering items while waiting for your perma-partner(s), for instance, does not count as "doing something".)
Avoiding being part of a permagroup is easy:
1) Mix up the people you travel with. This is a good idea for reasons other than avoiding permagrouping - it gathers you a larger network of allies to call on when you are in need.
2) Treat everyone according to their IC merits. One simple way to guarantee this is to not tell other people who you are playing.
3) Ask yourself if you are exploiting your connection to the other character(s) to gain an unfair advantage over another player. This can be a difficult determination to make, but fairness to other players will be at the heart of the staff's decision, so weigh it carefully.
See also RULES.
|
|
|
|
|
MRSK | Tue 27-Mar-12 10:50 AM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
| |
|
#107781, "Some kind of goodbuys"
In response to Reply #0
|
So where to start? Eleagra never planed as somewhat serious char. My aim with her was to give Empire some breath it really lacked - totaly ruined after Syvih rulership cabal, no heroes, hordes of fort. So I was planning to come up, give bring some hell to fort and delete when Empire would be at decent strenght again. It didn't work out but here we comes to the build.
After my failed felar experiment and concidering my aim I just wanted some cookie cutter build with decent power ceiling which I know how to play. So it was some mix between Biklaha nad Targrala. Fire sword/mace greeting/crushing. As an aside Bik and Targ had axe as second spec and I should I admit I liked mace way way more. Looking back I think Adarmar like build would suit circumstances much more - fire giants are not good at fighting vs gangs. It's just me prefering later high kill sealing builds for high survivability builds.
Eleagra start was rough. I rarely died less than once per session which is ####ing too much for me I couldn't keep on somewhat decent set, didn't have really good swords and if not Tzar who kept providing me with armors I'd likely deleted somewhere in late november. Things only settled down somewhat with Seis upcomming. Now he was my meat shield and I could survive much better even if with Raegan's leadership(if we can call it leadership) Empire got into #### yet again and Fort didn't seem to start fading away out of utter boredom I would imagine they had. I still have no clue why it took that much time to get rid of inactive emperor. Guess would he won't #### up his logging once per week we'd still have him as emperor?
Somewhere around that time I also found that CF drasticaly lost it's apeal for me. So I just decided to play Eleagra as long as I can at least somewhat enjoy it and then call it the end.
As about Emperor thing and Imm conspiracy. I don't have much desire to discuss it now. It just doesn't really matter now. Though during the time between Raegan and Otuerghad when there were again pretty much no active imperials except me, Otuerghad and Seis, concidering the promise from Imperial council after Sektah-Rah mask incident and the opionion of big part of playerbase I think my hopes for the Emperor without vote were pretty reasonable. Imms decided other way around and I'm fine with it. As for the vote and the way it was set up I knew the result as soon as recieved the note about it. After all I think it's all for good. Would I get Emperor I'd have at least 300-400 more hours to play now which means I would miss yet one more spring
I would skip personal goodbuys. If you have something to say you are wellcome and I will respond.
Peace out and just as I'm leaving at least for some decent time here's the list of my favorite previous chars
Liriana, imperial bard, Elite Kornuel, imperial bard, War Master Agar, village defender, arial dagger/mace balance/whirlwind Eleia, imperial bard, War Master Ikbe, imperial fire AP, Dread Lord Biklaha, nexus warrior, cloud sword/axe greeting/crushing Dzintiri, imperial bard, War Master Adarmar, imperial warrior, Emperor-bloodoath, arial dagger/hth riddle/gates/forsaken Targrala, imperial warrior, Elite, fire sword/axe greeting/enigma Hildara, imperial human AP, Elite Kirsly, nexus warrior, arial dagger/mace riddle/whirlwind Eleagra, imperial warrior, War Master-anathema, fire sword/mace greeting/crushing
|
|
|
|
  |
Daevryn | Tue 27-Mar-12 11:11 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#107783, "RE: Some kind of goodbuys"
In response to Reply #6
|
>As about Emperor thing and Imm conspiracy. I don't have much >desire to discuss it now. It just doesn't really matter now. >Though during the time between Raegan and Otuerghad when there >were again pretty much no active imperials except me, >Otuerghad and Seis, concidering the promise from Imperial >council after Sektah-Rah mask incident and the opionion of big >part of playerbase I think my hopes for the Emperor without >vote were pretty reasonable. Imms decided other way around and >I'm fine with it.
I don't think I've ever heard the Sekhtan-Rah incident story, if you don't mind elaborating.
I'm not trying to defend anyone or any choice here exactly, just giving you my different perspective on it and how things went down as best as I could remember. If it isn't interesting to you, feel free to ignore it.
One thing I don't know if you ever really factor into your calculus is that you tend to play a certain subset of hours of the day (we all do) and that it's possible to totally miss other characters. With the hours I play, I probably didn't see Eleagra online even a dozen times ever, although obviously I know secondhand that she was on a lot and beating a lot of people down. Even when Raeghan (sp?) was pretty inactive I personally was still seeing Raeghan on a lot more. It's pretty possible to come to different conclusions than you did about who was how active when.
Here's how I remember the votes (and maybe there were more that I missed):
First one comes up a four-way tie. At that point Baer was trying to goad Enlilth into just picking you, which doesn't really matter except in the sense that it always was funny to me afterwards when you seemed to think she was out to get you when she might have been the only one in your corner. Enlilth ended up picking Raeghan and with the information he had at the time I don't think it was a wrong choice, although I do think Empire probably would have beat down a lot more people under Eleagra. There were some ways in which I thought Raeghan was a pretty unusually cool Empire character and I totally understand the curiosity to give a character like that a little rope and see if they hang themselves or make some kind of awesome macrame from it.
Second one, where Otuerghad became Emperor, Eleagra didn't get one vote. That was a surprise to me, but what can you do?
|
|
|
|
      |
MRSK | Tue 27-Mar-12 12:54 PM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
| |
|
#107786, "As an aside note"
In response to Reply #9
|
I don't think that Fort main Imm should have any valuable opinion about Empire's leadership. My main concern with your wife along with overrewarding thing is that we have too much Baerinika pretty much everywhere. While it's cool to have active Imm it often comes as crossing the line and getting into the things which are just not her bussiness. Though it's just my maybe biased opinion.
|
|
|
|
        |
Dallevian | Tue 27-Mar-12 01:22 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1639 posts
| |
|
#107788, "Further aside"
In response to Reply #10
|
Keep in mind that Baer probably gets to watch more players more often. I think this is what Daevryn was getting at - Baer had some insights into all the characters and simply shared it with Enlilth. Bottom line - Enlilth's decision.
|
|
|
|
          |
Daevryn | Tue 27-Mar-12 01:30 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#107789, "This."
In response to Reply #12
|
None of the imms are on 24/7. We try to help each other out by pointing out the good and the bad we see, and generally I'll pull logs for someone on request if they want more detail on some incident that happened while they weren't logged on.
Mostly I think this works in your favor as a player, like "Hey Twist you're missing this really cool Twist guy who plays when you don't, you should try to catch him somehow" but yeah, of course there's also "Hey Marcatis, this Trib was bashing unwanted people down in Galadon for some reason last night."
|
|
|
|
        |
Enlilth | Tue 27-Mar-12 01:42 PM |
Member since 20th Jan 2008
187 posts
| |
|
#107790, "RE: Re: Qiirvaas"
In response to Reply #11
|
Random side notes.
1.) That vote came out tied. Zulg's choice in the end I believe.
2.) If it weren't for the opinions of other imms, some characters would never get anything from me. Some characters never do anyway because of my play times.
3.) Baerinika doesn't especially hate you, or the guy playing tzar. Your perceptions may differ, but that's my honest belief.
-- Try an Enlilth follower today! Enlilth, now with 40% more chewey caramel in every bite. --
|
|
|
|
        |
MRSK | Tue 27-Mar-12 03:44 PM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
| |
|
#107797, "RE: Re: Qiirvaas"
In response to Reply #11
|
>>>Just FWIW, Qiirvaas actually did get a vote, he just couldn't be voted for. His vote was sent to Enlilth.
That's what I ment. Maybe was lost in translation.
|
|
|
|
  |
Enlilth | Tue 27-Mar-12 11:20 AM |
Member since 20th Jan 2008
187 posts
| |
|
#107784, "RE: Some kind of goodbuys"
In response to Reply #6
|
I liked this character. I tatted and titled this character. If you think I wasn't pulling for you most of the time then you're wrong. I think you're just disgustingly talented with that build, and like Twist says if that's fun for you then play it. I get the same criticism every time I delete yet another druid.
-- Try an Enlilth follower today! Enlilth, now with 40% more chewey caramel in every bite. --
|
|
|
|
  |
|
#107799, "RE: Some kind of goodbuys"
In response to Reply #6
|
We've had our differences and disagreements but I will say that you are a consistent challenge to play against and I think you bring a lot to the game as an individual.
Sorry to see you go and hope you come back soon.
|
|
|
|
  |
TMNS | Thu 29-Mar-12 01:23 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#107837, "Boo for forgetting Arleri."
In response to Reply #6
|
Only time we were allies other than Biklaha/Ixralleinda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107778, "Damn you were tough!"
In response to Reply #0
|
I always had fun trying my luck against you, though. The only chance I ever had at you was with careful planning and alot of luck, which I almost had the one day under the sewers. Ambush, savage knockout, snare, another ambush later...and you get away.
You were a good character, though. GLWYN, and hope it's just as deadly, I wanna see how I measure up against it with my next one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107776, "Damnit all! You elusive bitch!"
In response to Reply #0
|
I wanted another chance to get you, but all good things come to an end. I should not have stayed to fight with you that time in Hamsah. Your flurry was perfectly timed though and it did me in. If only you had stood still for another round during the latter fights, you would have been a corpse. I hope you return to the fields soon. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Twist | Mon 26-Mar-12 09:05 PM |
Member since 23rd Sep 2006
3431 posts
| |
|
#107775, "In general I liked this character."
In response to Reply #0
|
AFAIR I don't think you had a role, and your roleplay was mostly the same as most of your characters - ok but nothing truly shiny.
That said in combat you were majorly feared and you were, from what I saw, most always a class act. I watched you eat some poor guy alive today and (despite losing parts of a nice set recently) leave him everything but his gold. I didn't have time to see if his stuff was mostly worthless, but some folks would grab it all to sort later.
You likely believe that the imms had something to do with you not getting Empress, but the way the vote went says otherwise. I think the worst thing that happened to you is a lack of imm love (no 3rd legacy, etc.) which, honestly, I'll go back to the "no role and only ok roleplay" aspect.
As for those who have a hard time with the fact that you "only play Empire" or "only play giant sword" or whatever, screw'm. Play what is fun for you, I say. You play Imperial well, you play warrior well, so...if that's fun for you, go nuts.
That's all I've got. I generally enjoy your characters (though I always seem to end up an enemy even when I'm playing Empire ), so I hope you get the spark to play another. If not, well, hopefully you enjoyed your time in the Fields.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107773, "Sad to see"
In response to Reply #0
|
This character was one of the strongest I can remember in a long time.
Well done. I know in my deletion you said I backtrailed Fort but that was never the case and when Eachainn and such show up on the Battlefields I will post the logs.
Great character and good luck with the next.
|
|
|
|
|
Odrallag | Mon 26-Mar-12 06:18 PM |
Member since 18th Nov 2011
46 posts
| |
|
#107772, "RE: (DELETED) [None] Eleagra Gurkral the Legend of the ..."
In response to Reply #0
|
Tough foe for me. Mostly due to the fact that the only no-remove swords I could get reliably, you were resistant to. Also, you are far more careful than I am, and because of that you prep well and avoid situations where you might not win. You made any fight with Tzar an absolute nightmare unless I had some no remove wrathing swords, which was like, once in my entire life. Also, while most of us in the village were semi-avoiding war with Empire, you pressed your advantage at near every opportunity. We didn't have much RP interaction, so I can't comment on the whole anath/Empire stuff. I both enjoy, and hate being on the opposite side of you in PK wars. I enjoy it because I know I am measuring myself against what I consider to be one of the better PKers in the game, and hate it because you are so careful and hard to kill. In any case, GLWYN and see you in the fields.
|
|
|
|
|