|
Zulghinlour | Thu 17-Apr-03 08:08 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#94, "It's Baaaa-ack...(aka more loving for Falstaff)"
|
No. Not Empire you freaks.
Choosable prime stat rolling for human/half-elf/half-drow warriors has returned. The one caveat is. A half-elf who chooses their prime stat of dexterity will have 2 points go to dexterity and 1 point to strength since a 24 dex is above both that of a human and an elf. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
RE: It's Baaaa-ack...(aka more loving for Falstaff),
Isildur,
21-Apr-03 01:08 PM, #9
RE: It's Baaaa-ack...(aka more loving for Falstaff),
Zulghinlour,
21-Apr-03 01:09 PM, #10
RE: It's Baaaa-ack...(aka more loving for Falstaff),
Evil Genius (Anonymous),
22-Apr-03 04:06 AM, #11
RE: It's Baaaa-ack...(aka more loving for Falstaff),
A_druiD,
22-Apr-03 10:44 PM, #12
Oh, Zulg. Your so Romantic!,
GinGa,
18-Apr-03 11:46 AM, #7
Does this mean..,
Anal_Retentive,
18-Apr-03 03:26 AM, #5
Correct (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
18-Apr-03 03:26 AM, #6
I love you. No, really. (n/t),
Random Thinker,
17-Apr-03 09:46 PM, #3
Feelin' the love.,
Falstaff,
17-Apr-03 09:20 PM, #1
RE: Feelin' the love.,
Zulghinlour,
17-Apr-03 09:21 PM, #2
All you need is love, ba ba ba ba baaaaa,
Falstaff,
18-Apr-03 03:26 AM, #4
There's an advanced search option, too,
Yanoreth,
18-Apr-03 04:55 PM, #8
RE: There's an advanced search option, too,
Boldereth,
29-Apr-03 10:56 AM, #13
Actually...,
Yanoreth,
29-Apr-03 11:00 AM, #14
| |
  |
Zulghinlour | Mon 21-Apr-03 01:09 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#114, "RE: It's Baaaa-ack...(aka more loving for Falstaff)"
In response to Reply #9
|
>Wis - seems to have the same problem as dex. Max elf wis is >21 since they can't allocate. Human w/ prime wis is still >only 23. I'd suggest applying the +2/+1 rule, except then >there's virtually no reason to ever choose wis as a prime >stat.
And why would any warrior choose wis as a prime stat? No good reason I can think of, and that's why we left it.
>Dex - Am I right to assume the +2/+1 thing doesn't apply to >half-drow since max drow dex is 24?
Already answered below
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
    |
|
#116, "RE: It's Baaaa-ack...(aka more loving for Falstaff)"
In response to Reply #10
|
>And why would any warrior choose wis as a prime stat? No good >reason I can think of, and that's why we left it.
Hrm, would you like me to quote Josiah?
|
|
|
|
    |
A_druiD | Tue 22-Apr-03 10:39 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5 posts
| |
|
#117, "RE: It's Baaaa-ack...(aka more loving for Falstaff)"
In response to Reply #10
|
I would think a prime stat as wisdom would be more for RP reasons, but perhaps Im on crack, an stuff.
-A_druiD-
|
|
|
|
|
Anal_Retentive | Fri 18-Apr-03 03:06 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
52 posts
| |
|
#99, "Does this mean.."
In response to Reply #0
|
That a half-drow will get +3 dex and +0 to str?
|
|
|
|
  |
Zulghinlour | Fri 18-Apr-03 03:26 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#100, "Correct (n/t)"
In response to Reply #5
|
n/t So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|
Random Thinker | Thu 17-Apr-03 09:34 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9 posts
| |
|
#97, "I love you. No, really. (n/t)"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|
Falstaff | Thu 17-Apr-03 08:48 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
136 posts
| |
|
#95, "Feelin' the love."
In response to Reply #0
|
Now wouldn't something like
"Prime stat change for human/half-elf/half-drow warriors"
have given a short idea of the update without having to open it? Basically making it easier to search for later, instead of looking for "lovin'" update #467? Not trying to be an ass, just trying to offer constructive criticism.
Falstaff
|
|
|
|
    |
Falstaff | Thu 17-Apr-03 10:10 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
136 posts
| |
|
#98, "All you need is love, ba ba ba ba baaaaa"
In response to Reply #2
|
Didn't know the search function worked like that. Thanks for filling me in.
-Falstaff
|
|
|
|
      |
Yanoreth | Fri 18-Apr-03 04:55 PM |
Member since 10th Mar 2003
896 posts
| |
|
#102, "There's an advanced search option, too"
In response to Reply #4
|
With the advanced search, you can specify which field(s) you want to search in, as well as fancy and/or technology.
The best thing about this new forum system is that it runs off a mySQL backend instead of flat files. If you know anything about running searches on databases, the flat files system becomes slower and slower to search as the number of posts increases. Hence the old forum's "archive" function. The mySQL backend minimizes this, so there is no longer a need to archive any of the posts.
And searches should be really fast. That's of course provided we don't have problems with the mySQL server like we did a couple of weeks ago. :-P
|
|
|
|
        |
Boldereth | Tue 29-Apr-03 09:07 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
197 posts
| |
|
#122, "RE: There's an advanced search option, too"
In response to Reply #8
|
I still say y'all should let use something home grown or akin. This software has had its share of dehabilitating bugs to make me think it might not be worth the money.
|
|
|
|
          |
Yanoreth | Tue 29-Apr-03 11:00 AM |
Member since 10th Mar 2003
896 posts
| |
|
#123, "Actually..."
In response to Reply #13
|
Those "debilitating" bugs you have presumed are because of the forum software have not been. We've been having server problems, which have nothing to do with the forum software.
There were a few minor bugs and of course the whole "the way it looks" issue with this software. Right now, those server troubles and my own lack of time are preventing me from tweaking anything, but I expect to be able to in the next few days.
There is no forum software that everyone would like, and I'm sure there would be complaints about those other two forum softwares, too.
|
|
|
|
|