| |
|
#19116, "Defiance bug."
|
So this sword is for one hand and two-handed at the same time.
I have used "hack" on two-hand dedicated paladin,
arm broken, he aren't gonna drop sword, and still may use their skills
based on two-hand dedication.
|
|
|
|
  By design,
Daevryn,
06-Oct-11 02:18 PM, #1
But not kotegaeshi,
Theerkla,
07-Oct-11 12:37 AM, #2
RE: But not kotegaeshi,
Daevryn,
07-Oct-11 12:37 AM, #3
 This was what I remembered,
Theerkla,
11-Oct-11 12:44 PM, #4
is that just defiance or all no disarm,
laxman,
11-Oct-11 12:44 PM, #5
 All nodisarm...,
Twist ,
11-Oct-11 03:21 PM, #7
I have no experience with this from either direction, b...,
Tac,
11-Oct-11 12:44 PM, #6
| |
|
|
Daevryn | Thu 06-Oct-11 02:18 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
|     |
|
#19152, "By design"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
| |
|
Theerkla | Thu 06-Oct-11 04:50 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#19155, "But not kotegaeshi"
In response to Reply #1
|
|
|
| |
|
Daevryn | Fri 07-Oct-11 12:37 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#19157, "RE: But not kotegaeshi"
In response to Reply #2
|
Yup, also kotegaeshi.
I can confirm it's been that way at least 4 or 5 years and probably longer.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Theerkla | Fri 07-Oct-11 05:24 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#19158, "This was what I remembered"
In response to Reply #3
|
|
|
| |
|
laxman | Fri 07-Oct-11 08:22 AM |
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
|  |
|
#19159, "is that just defiance or all no disarm"
In response to Reply #3
|
Because as gogonop I was dual wielding 2 no disarm weapons and kot and hack would still make me drop the offhand. It was fixed after that char but that wasn't 4 years ago.
Just sayin
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Tac | Fri 07-Oct-11 08:41 AM |
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2050 posts
| |
|
#19160, "I have no experience with this from either direction, b..."
In response to Reply #3
|
I would have sworn, probably based on reading logs, that while they wouldn't drop defiance due to kot, they wouldn't be able to use two-handed skills anymore. Is that what you are confirming is not the case? I think so, but the answer seemed a little ambiguous.
Tac
|
|
|
|
|
