Subject: "RE: I'm really glad you started this thread." This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #42162
Show all folders

tongni12Thu 29-Dec-11 08:33 PM
Member since 21st Jul 2011
25 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#42175, "RE: I'm really glad you started this thread."


          

>>For others such as yourself and multitudes of other players, you want to be at the final destination with as little work as possible to ensure that at the final destination you can truly gauge your skill as a player (ie, at an equal point, you can determine if you are better than say, Deriveh).

I don't think you quite get it. I assume I have probably near the most area knowledge and time spent exploring out of any non-IMM. I know all the area explores extremely well. I spend hours combing every area, I try to know every room name, every little hidden door or locked room, that random potion that gives +1 hitroll, everything in any area that I might have a PK in. Why? It's just fun - I like exploring and I think a lot of the areas are really great. (notable exception: Prison of Glymarch)

There are some things you just don't find. Maybe it's a slight on me as an explorer that after all this time, I didn't even know room x existed, which is a locked room in an area that I'm not sure I ever had a PK in, with the key being held by the mob in the door - the only clue that mob is a mage is that he's sometimes invis. Does it mean I want to be there with the least work because I got the answer off AIM? It's not something I would have ever gotten.

Let's take a step back - go back to when wands just changed over, where I knew every wand, 50% by having that wand, 25% by knowing a char IC that had that wand, and 25% by having a friend OOC who had that wand. Now, new wands popped up everywhere. Does it mean that I want the path of least work to not spend the tedious time killing every mage mob with a new character that doesn't want to rank up to detect artifact? If there is a quest that has 10,000 runes on the ground, and you have to pick up the correct one and put it in a box on the other side of the area, and you can carry only one at a time, if you did the first thousand and you complained on AIM, and someone told you it was rune 6345, is that a slight on you because you didn't grind it out?

That said, I did do a lot of the work after the wand system switched over, and I found 90% of them after 100+ hours of looking, and I didn't mind it too much honestly. I can safely say some I would have never found on my own. I just wanted to post this because I think it's unfair to casual gamers and that the admins who put it in defend it a little too zealously because of all the time they spent on it. Personally I like the whole system - but I think it works great even if all the wands are listed in the Lyceum, or with clues, or whatever. Out of my last four mage characters, two didn't use sleek black rods. I'd say that the current system accomplishes a lot even with all the knowledge.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicWand lists, etc. [View all] , tongni12, Tue 03-Jan-12 03:22 PM
Reply I'm really glad you started this thread., TMNS, 29-Dec-11 07:51 PM, #1
Reply Don't worry..., Zulghinlour, 29-Dec-11 07:54 PM, #2
Reply Rolling a rager. nt, Artificial, 29-Dec-11 07:58 PM, #3
Reply Ah, the Napalm strategy., TMNS, 29-Dec-11 07:59 PM, #4
Reply I'm not joking..., Zulghinlour, 29-Dec-11 08:04 PM, #5
Reply There isn't a problem, Tsunami, 29-Dec-11 08:04 PM, #6
Reply On the contrary, it's a win/win, Tsunami, 29-Dec-11 08:07 PM, #7
Reply I love you, so please don't take this as argumentative., TMNS, 29-Dec-11 08:11 PM, #8
Reply It doesn't sound like a horrible idea., Lhydia, 29-Dec-11 08:15 PM, #9
Reply DO IT, Gaspar, 29-Dec-11 08:17 PM, #10
Reply I like this idea, Elerosse, 29-Dec-11 08:24 PM, #11
Reply RE: Wand lists, etc., Isildur, 29-Dec-11 08:31 PM, #12
Reply RE: I'm really glad you started this thread., tongni12, 29-Dec-11 08:33 PM #13
Reply RE: I love you, so please don't take this as argumentat..., Isildur, 29-Dec-11 08:36 PM, #14
Reply Depends:, tongni12, 29-Dec-11 08:40 PM, #15
Reply I can jive with your explanation., TMNS, 29-Dec-11 08:43 PM, #16
Reply Again, this involves treating the symptoms, not the dis..., TMNS, 29-Dec-11 08:53 PM, #17
Reply RE: Again, this involves treating the symptoms, not the..., Isildur, 29-Dec-11 09:01 PM, #18
Reply People see what they want to see:, tongni12, 29-Dec-11 09:23 PM, #19
Reply My thoughts..., Not An Imm, 29-Dec-11 09:25 PM, #20
Reply One thing that just seems odd to me from your post, Puhguly, 29-Dec-11 09:55 PM, #21
Reply I'm with this guy. Less lottery?, Lhydia, 29-Dec-11 10:00 PM, #22
Reply Hahaha!, Conundrum, 29-Dec-11 10:31 PM, #23
Reply RE: One thing that just seems odd to me from your post, tongni12, 29-Dec-11 10:34 PM, #24
Reply Best. Santa Zulg. Ever., Scrimbul, 29-Dec-11 11:15 PM, #25
Reply How is this any better than just making the prep knowle..., Gaplemo, 29-Dec-11 11:41 PM, #26
Reply Yep, AXera, 29-Dec-11 11:53 PM, #27
Reply RE: How is this any better than just making the prep kn..., Daevryn, 30-Dec-11 12:18 AM, #28
Reply RE: Depends:, Daevryn, 30-Dec-11 12:19 AM, #29
Reply RE: How is this any better than just making the prep kn..., Malakhi, 30-Dec-11 12:49 AM, #30
Reply I've changed my view a bit, incognito, 30-Dec-11 01:11 AM, #31
Reply I like to think I've competed, incognito, 30-Dec-11 01:12 AM, #32
Reply Of course, Gaplemo, 30-Dec-11 01:21 AM, #33
Reply Please don't punish us for a few jerks :(, highbutterfly, 30-Dec-11 03:55 AM, #34
Reply It's about damn time, Grudan, 30-Dec-11 05:01 AM, #35
Reply Sulye would have been nerfed or denied under what I pro..., TMNS, 30-Dec-11 05:04 AM, #36
Reply And you say we players are emotional., TMNS, 30-Dec-11 05:09 AM, #37
Reply Please come back. We miss you Panda., TMNS, 30-Dec-11 05:10 AM, #38
Reply Not intended as a jab, Puhguly, 30-Dec-11 05:32 AM, #39
Reply I have a better idea, for sleeks in particular., DurNominator, 30-Dec-11 07:19 AM, #40
Reply is anyone else annoyed, laxman, 30-Dec-11 09:05 AM, #41
Reply RE: I have a better idea, for sleeks in particular., Rayihn, 30-Dec-11 09:16 AM, #42
Reply RE: Sulye would have been nerfed or denied under what I..., Isildur, 30-Dec-11 09:47 AM, #43
Reply RE: I have a better idea, for sleeks in particular., Elerosse, 30-Dec-11 09:50 AM, #44
Reply RE: I have a better idea, for sleeks in particular., Isildur, 30-Dec-11 09:51 AM, #45
Reply I like this idea IF.... You leave the store bought prep..., Alston, 30-Dec-11 10:06 AM, #46
Reply RE: Wand lists, etc., Ghuljun, 30-Dec-11 10:06 AM, #47
Reply I long ago decided mages do NOT need wands., Alston, 30-Dec-11 10:13 AM, #48
Reply ZULG: Please remember that we all love this game., Alston, 30-Dec-11 10:16 AM, #49
Reply Add more wand locations and the advantage of having a w..., DurNominator, 30-Dec-11 10:24 AM, #50
Reply my attempt at a solution (long), Isildur, 30-Dec-11 10:24 AM, #51
Reply Well said, MoetEtChandon, 30-Dec-11 10:24 AM, #52
Reply RE: I have a better idea, for sleeks in particular., Rayihn, 30-Dec-11 10:31 AM, #53
Reply Thumbs up from me, Jad_Hoven, 30-Dec-11 10:47 AM, #54
Reply I can sense the temptation in that, but..., Amberion, 30-Dec-11 10:48 AM, #55
Reply Actually, I'm not sarcastic. , DurNominator, 30-Dec-11 10:49 AM, #56
Reply Sleeks already have a level requirement, Artificial, 30-Dec-11 10:56 AM, #57
Reply RE: I can sense the temptation in that, but..., Daevryn, 30-Dec-11 10:57 AM, #58
Reply RE: my attempt at a solution (long), Malakhi, 30-Dec-11 11:02 AM, #59
Reply So if I want to completely ruin a strong char, Artificial, 30-Dec-11 11:01 AM, #60
Reply RE: Wand lists, etc., Daevryn, 30-Dec-11 11:02 AM, #61
Reply RE: So if I want to completely ruin a strong char, Malakhi, 30-Dec-11 11:11 AM, #62
Reply RE: my attempt at a solution (long), Knac, 30-Dec-11 11:15 AM, #63
Reply I can only think of a few items, Artificial, 30-Dec-11 11:19 AM, #64
Reply RE: Sleeks already have a level requirement, Isildur, 30-Dec-11 11:20 AM, #65
Reply With the illusionary change, Artificial, 30-Dec-11 11:22 AM, #66
Reply RE: my attempt at a solution (long), Isildur, 30-Dec-11 11:25 AM, #67
Reply RE: With the illusionary change, Isildur, 30-Dec-11 11:26 AM, #68
Reply Ok, I'll bite., tongni12, 30-Dec-11 11:43 AM, #69
Reply RE: Ok, I'll bite., Daevryn, 30-Dec-11 11:59 AM, #70
Reply RE: my attempt at a solution (long), Malakhi, 30-Dec-11 11:59 AM, #71
Reply RE: I can sense the temptation in that, but..., Elerosse, 30-Dec-11 12:04 PM, #72
Reply It has been a great run., Alston, 30-Dec-11 12:08 PM, #73
Reply Hah CF on Ebay!, Rayihn, 30-Dec-11 12:10 PM, #74
Reply I'd like for you and Daevryn to know, Alston, 30-Dec-11 12:20 PM, #75
Reply RE: I'd like for you and Daevryn to know, Daevryn, 30-Dec-11 12:24 PM, #76
Reply RE: my attempt at a solution (long), Isildur, 30-Dec-11 12:43 PM, #77
Reply RE: Ok, I'll bite., Isildur, 30-Dec-11 01:00 PM, #78
Reply RE: I have a better idea, for sleeks in particular., JoeCloud, 30-Dec-11 01:12 PM, #79
Reply Forgive me. I was drunk last night. Thank god I didn'..., TMNS, 30-Dec-11 01:21 PM, #80
Reply RE: I'd like for you and Daevryn to know, Isildur, 30-Dec-11 01:24 PM, #81
Reply No, but I remember them, tongni12, 30-Dec-11 01:28 PM, #82
Reply Another solution, MoetEtChandon, 30-Dec-11 01:32 PM, #83
Reply #### a college fund, Zulg needs beer money :), TMNS, 30-Dec-11 01:33 PM, #84
Reply I agree with Malakhi., TMNS, 30-Dec-11 01:39 PM, #85
Reply Horrible idea, Cenatar_, 30-Dec-11 01:40 PM, #86
Reply RE: No, but I remember them, Isildur, 30-Dec-11 01:41 PM, #87
Reply RE: Hah CF on Ebay!, Grudan, 30-Dec-11 01:59 PM, #88
Reply RE: I long ago decided mages do NOT need wands., Cenatar_, 30-Dec-11 02:46 PM, #89
Reply I like this solution, Cenatar_, 30-Dec-11 03:04 PM, #90
Reply Please don't give up on CF, Valkenar, 30-Dec-11 03:08 PM, #91
Reply What about strengthening detect artifact?, JoeCloud, 30-Dec-11 04:03 PM, #92
Reply RE: I'm not joking..., The Heretic, 30-Dec-11 04:08 PM, #93
Reply More solutions, Anghwyr, 30-Dec-11 04:25 PM, #94
Reply The only time people complain about sleeks ..., Bell, 30-Dec-11 04:58 PM, #95
Reply I think your premise is wrong..., Tac, 30-Dec-11 05:03 PM, #96
Reply I blame Isildur! And a lack of Imm fest!, lasentia, 30-Dec-11 06:00 PM, #97
Reply Both those were clouds I thought., lasentia, 30-Dec-11 06:04 PM, #98
Reply Wow, this whole thing really got out of hand., TripHitNdip (Anonymous), 30-Dec-11 07:02 PM, #99
Reply RE: I blame Isildur! And a lack of Imm fest!, Isildur, 30-Dec-11 09:23 PM, #100
Reply RE: Both those were clouds I thought., Isildur, 30-Dec-11 09:24 PM, #101
Reply Its like the doomsday switch, Oldril, 31-Dec-11 05:36 PM, #102
Reply Why not just stop all the secrecy then?, Oldril, 31-Dec-11 05:37 PM, #103
Reply Don't like this., fist-law, 31-Dec-11 06:15 PM, #104
Reply RE: I can sense the temptation in that, but..., Kamuela_, 31-Dec-11 08:41 PM, #105
Reply RE: Don't like this., Daevryn, 31-Dec-11 09:12 PM, #106
Reply I say quit ####ing around and go for it. Threats and th..., Lhydia, 31-Dec-11 09:17 PM, #107
Reply Right on lets do dis #### nt, Runaktla, 31-Dec-11 10:07 PM, #108
Reply RE: Don't like this., Isildur, 01-Jan-12 12:07 AM, #109
Reply Twist threw out his back. nt, Artificial, 01-Jan-12 12:23 AM, #110
Reply That's naive, incognito, 01-Jan-12 07:08 AM, #111
Reply That doesn't change the fact, incognito, 01-Jan-12 07:06 AM, #112
Reply Exactly. Which is why it won't ever actually happen and..., Lhydia, 01-Jan-12 10:44 AM, #113
Reply RE: Exactly. Which is why it won't ever actually happen..., Rayihn, 01-Jan-12 11:06 AM, #114
Reply You're telling me to be less abrasive? , Lhydia, 01-Jan-12 11:53 AM, #115
Reply RE: You're telling me to be less abrasive? , Daevryn, 01-Jan-12 12:23 PM, #116
Reply That makes sense on all counts. , Lhydia, 01-Jan-12 12:35 PM, #117
Reply RE: Don't like this., Malakhi, 01-Jan-12 07:38 PM, #118
Reply RE: You're telling me to be less abrasive? , N b M, 01-Jan-12 08:14 PM, #119
Reply RE: You're telling me to be less abrasive? , Isildur, 02-Jan-12 12:25 AM, #120
Reply Of course., Oldril, 02-Jan-12 12:54 AM, #121
Reply This is a great great post!, Oldril, 02-Jan-12 12:56 AM, #122
Reply Man you have an ego the size of a battleship Jalim, Oldril, 02-Jan-12 01:06 AM, #123
Reply Listen to your condescending comments, Oldril, 02-Jan-12 01:07 AM, #124
Reply ~~ n/t, Alston, 02-Jan-12 04:29 AM, #125
Reply RE: Don't like this., fist-law, 02-Jan-12 04:33 AM, #126
Reply RE: Don't like this., Malakhi, 02-Jan-12 04:55 AM, #127
Reply You are getting your worlds mixed up again. , Lhydia, 02-Jan-12 10:11 AM, #128
Reply Except nobody is selling anything..., Twist, 02-Jan-12 10:16 AM, #129
Reply There you go again Twist, saying it better than me, Oldril, 02-Jan-12 10:48 AM, #130
Reply Longer fights, Lightmage, 02-Jan-12 11:44 AM, #131
Reply I like that people race for it, incognito, 02-Jan-12 03:48 PM, #132
Reply As someone who likes to play elves and dark elves, incognito, 02-Jan-12 03:52 PM, #133
Reply RE: Of course., incognito, 02-Jan-12 07:03 PM, #134
Reply Umm, incognito, 02-Jan-12 07:17 PM, #135
Reply Please see my newbie boosts on Gameplay, incognito, 02-Jan-12 07:28 PM, #136
Reply Don't worry..., Jhyrbian, 03-Jan-12 02:56 AM, #137
Reply A suggestion, Krathreal, 04-Jan-12 02:54 AM, #138
Reply This is assuming a LOT., Tesline, 04-Jan-12 01:42 PM, #139
Reply Please remove preps for a week or two., Void, 25-Jan-12 09:44 PM, #140
Reply I endorse this solution., Eskelian, 26-Jan-12 04:44 AM, #141
Reply RE: I'm not joking..., Eskelian, 26-Jan-12 04:48 AM, #142
Reply Not to sound like a jerk but...., Eskelian, 26-Jan-12 04:53 AM, #143
Reply RE: Don't worry..., Eskelian, 26-Jan-12 04:59 AM, #144
Reply RE: Umm, Eskelian, 26-Jan-12 05:11 AM, #145
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #42162 Previous topic | Next topic