Zulghinlour | Wed 02-Jun-10 08:00 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#32913, "RE: Idea for the Members Command"
|
>I humbly suggest that the following be added to the output of >"members applicant": > >* Game hours played since pledging >* Real-life days since pledging > >This would greatly assist with some changes I'd like to make >regarding the Maran application process. Changes that both >members and applicants should appreciate. > >Besides just empowering mortal leaders to give preference to >applicants who've been "waiting" a long time, this change >would discourage applicants from "late pledging" in order to >avoid the inconvenience of participating in cabal wars, and >would encourage them to actually play their characters instead >of logging in only when the leader is online.
I see no good reason to add either of these changes. If you're using those to make a judgement, I'll find a low-risk way to optimize having them look good making them virtually useless. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
Idea for the Members Command
[View all] , Ageryn, Wed 02-Jun-10 02:33 PM
You take this s**t way too seriously. ~,
_Magus_,
03-Jun-10 09:01 AM, #11
RE: Idea for the Members Command,
Zulghinlour,
02-Jun-10 08:00 PM #8
RE: Idea for the Members Command,
Ageryn,
02-Jun-10 06:02 PM, #6
RE: Idea for the Members Command,
Zulghinlour,
02-Jun-10 08:01 PM, #9
RE: Idea for the Members Command,
Ageryn,
02-Jun-10 10:00 PM, #10
How is not defending as a pledge bad behavior?,
Splntrd,
03-Jun-10 09:37 AM, #12
Depends on the cabal,
Valkenar,
04-Jun-10 11:47 AM, #13
I agree.,
sorlag (Anonymous),
04-Jun-10 11:55 AM, #14
But there are already downsides to not showing.,
Splntrd,
04-Jun-10 02:46 PM, #15
What I'd rather see.,
sorlag (Anonymous),
02-Jun-10 04:58 PM, #4
disagree,
laxman,
02-Jun-10 02:46 PM, #1
RE: disagree,
Ageryn,
02-Jun-10 02:54 PM, #2
RE: disagree,
laxman,
02-Jun-10 04:52 PM, #3
RE: disagree,
Ageryn,
02-Jun-10 06:00 PM, #5
OH NOES!,
sleepy,
02-Jun-10 06:34 PM, #7
| |
|