Twist | Wed 28-Oct-09 08:25 AM |
Member since 23rd Sep 2006
3431 posts
| |
|
#27572, "Just as an FYI..."
|
I've brought at least one other player up to talk to them about this, and that's all I did, was talk. Ie tell them to knock it off. There was no denial or anything like that.
That was one particularly long-lived char (even at the time).
If someone rolled up some char last week, was like level 25, and outted himself as someone who had a well-known char list? Yeah I might deny, depending on how the talk went.
But a char as long-lasting as that particular one (or as long-lasting as Ahtieli), I'm not going to deny for that. That doesn't help anyone.
In general, I view the rule as being in place to stop someone from doing something like this:
Tweedledee the cloud giant hero is nice to lowbies. He kills the midnight dragon all the time, gives them gear, because he's bored.
One day, the player rolls Tweedledum the human assassin. He posts a few times in an obvious attempt to let everyone know that he's also Tweedledee, the nice guy who gives out stuff. Then in game as the lowbie assassin, he's asking for eq from some of the chars that he helped out with his other char.
Having people know the past chars of an uberlich type char doesn't really give that uberlich any sort of advantage.
It's not something we like to see happen in general, though.
|
|
|
Player Identity Revealed
[View all] , _Magus_, Tue 27-Oct-09 06:23 PM
My 2 cents,
Dwoggurd,
28-Oct-09 01:17 PM, #16
Just as an FYI...,
Twist,
28-Oct-09 08:25 AM #8
Good to add,
Ahtieli,
28-Oct-09 12:57 PM, #14
Good rule of thumb for everyone,
Valkenar,
28-Oct-09 01:09 PM, #15
Thing is that,
Ahtieli,
28-Oct-09 01:33 AM, #2
RE: Thing is that,
DurNominator,
28-Oct-09 03:17 AM, #3
Agreed.,
GinGa,
28-Oct-09 07:38 AM, #5
RE: Thing is that,
Ahtieli,
28-Oct-09 08:04 AM, #6
Here's a crazy idea.,
GinGa,
28-Oct-09 10:59 AM, #11
I don't know why you just ignore everything I've wrote.,
Ahtieli,
28-Oct-09 12:52 PM, #12
Did you report that post?,
DurNominator,
28-Oct-09 02:23 PM, #19
If I'd report it,
Ahtieli,
29-Oct-09 02:25 PM, #23
Not really,
DurNominator,
31-Oct-09 10:51 AM, #26
RE: Not really,
Ahtieli,
31-Oct-09 12:11 PM, #28
RE: Thing is that,
Prometeuss (Guest),
15-Nov-09 02:42 PM, #36
RE: Thing is that,
Daevryn,
28-Oct-09 07:11 AM, #4
RE: Thing is that,
Ahtieli,
28-Oct-09 08:07 AM, #7
Doesn't help that...,
Torak,
28-Oct-09 09:36 AM, #9
RE: Thing is that,
Daevryn,
29-Oct-09 10:34 AM, #22
Yes and no.,
Ahtieli,
31-Oct-09 12:21 PM, #29
Some perspective...,
Splntrd,
31-Oct-09 03:02 PM, #30
RE: Yes and no.,
Daevryn,
31-Oct-09 03:12 PM, #31
eheh,
Jhyrbian,
31-Oct-09 10:44 AM, #25
RE: eheh,
Ahtieli,
31-Oct-09 12:11 PM, #27
My interpretation...,
Minyar,
03-Nov-09 04:25 PM, #33
Heh~,
Ahtieli,
04-Nov-09 12:57 PM, #34
All of the times that Elhe defend Ahtieli on the forums...,
Minyar,
03-Nov-09 04:23 PM, #32
The post that finally said Elhe = Ahtieli was unnecessa...,
Bell,
28-Oct-09 10:31 AM, #10
Did you read what I've wrote?,
Ahtieli,
28-Oct-09 12:54 PM, #13
Yes I did.,
Bell,
30-Oct-09 09:18 AM, #24
RE: Thing is that,
_Magus_,
28-Oct-09 01:39 PM, #17
Okey I will try to explain it as simple as possible,
Ahtieli,
28-Oct-09 01:58 PM, #18
Dude...you post logs from ahtieli's perspective under y...,
Sarien,
29-Oct-09 09:10 AM, #20
You already proved,
Ahtieli,
29-Oct-09 10:13 AM, #21
Couple of points,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
14-Nov-09 07:17 PM, #35
RE: Player Identity Revealed,
Daevryn,
27-Oct-09 11:04 PM, #1
| |
|