The_Shark | Mon 17-May-04 08:17 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
59 posts
| |
|
#4553, "RE: I think he means the endless slaughter that is rank..."
|
>'and as a blacksmith,, it in no way means that you shoud not fight,, how else can you make a good sword if you do not know what a good sword shoud look like?'
When it comes to that, lets make it so his skill in the weapon affects how well he can create that kind of weapon. Ofcourse, that would mean that the smith must know all kinds of weapons, or he would be limited to being able to create just a few kinds of weapons. Perhaps make it choosable upon creation of the character.
Make the item created character-only. That way the smith has to decide who is to be able to use the item he create. Make the items rot_death aswell. And ofcourse put a timer on it, 20-30 ticks or something, perhaps even more before he can create another item. Should make bots rather ineffective. Make the ore expensive and only available through purchase.
Well, there are ways to solve those kind of problems if you really want to. But its all up to the Imps to decide if they think its worth the work or not.
|
|
|
A new kind of playing
[View all] , esoel, Mon 07-Jul-03 02:24 AM
Kinda counter to your statement but...,
Vecna,
03-May-04 10:19 PM, #23
How about "quest" skills?,
Evil Genius (Anonymous),
01-May-04 07:07 AM, #21
RE: A new kind of playing,
Isildur,
29-Apr-04 10:01 PM, #16
Turing tests.,
Valguarnera,
07-Jul-03 01:02 PM, #5
RE: Turing tests.,
esoel,
07-Jul-03 04:38 PM, #6
building your own forge. (off game topic),
Bajula,
03-May-04 08:22 PM, #22
A good way to implement this.,
josiah (Anonymous),
07-Jul-03 06:01 PM, #7
RE: A good way to implement this.,
esoel,
09-Jul-03 07:57 AM, #9
RE: A good way to implement this.,
Quislet,
09-Jul-03 08:26 AM, #10
RE: A good way to implement this.,
esoel,
09-Jul-03 08:48 AM, #11
RE: A good way to implement this.,
Quislet,
10-Jul-03 06:23 AM, #13
RE: Turing tests.,
Ululari,
08-Jul-03 11:56 AM, #8
RE: Turing tests.,
esoel,
09-Jul-03 08:58 AM, #12
ROFL,
Chalupah,
29-Apr-04 09:18 PM, #14
RE: ROFL,
nepenthe,
29-Apr-04 09:57 PM, #15
RE: ROFL,
(NOT Pro),
29-Apr-04 11:43 PM, #17
Alas, no.,
nepenthe,
30-Apr-04 12:37 AM, #19
Damn Zorsaul, I thought you were Yanny for real!,
(NOT Pro),
30-Apr-04 11:08 AM, #20
I'm Rick James, bitch.,
Dallevian,
30-Apr-04 12:24 AM, #18
So let people bot,
Xaannix,
03-May-04 11:34 PM, #25
No. (n/t),
Valguarnera,
04-May-04 08:03 AM, #27
Figured, hehe nt,
Xaannix,
07-May-04 06:19 AM, #28
RE: ROFL,
Chalupah,
12-May-04 10:06 PM, #30
Or, what you could do would be this.,
Xaannix,
03-May-04 11:31 PM, #24
RE: Or, what you could do would be this.,
Romanul,
04-May-04 02:53 AM, #26
Yeah sure,
Xaannix,
07-May-04 06:21 AM, #29
RE: A new kind of playing,
Marcus_,
07-Jul-03 09:07 AM, #1
RE: A new kind of playing,
Quislet,
07-Jul-03 09:40 AM, #2
I think he means the endless slaughter that is ranking,
Theerkla,
07-Jul-03 09:44 AM, #3
RE: I think he means the endless slaughter that is rank...,
esoel,
07-Jul-03 12:05 PM, #4
RE: I think he means the endless slaughter that is rank...,
The_Shark,
17-May-04 08:17 AM #31
| |
|