|
Mylinos | Fri 25-Aug-06 10:54 AM |
Member since 12th Sep 2005
98 posts
|     |
|
#14222, "Bards have some nice advantages too though but I don't think it needs a change.."
|
1) As mentioned by Tac, bard sleep does not initiate combat.
2) It is an area affect sleep, that is you can both sleep multiple targets, and targets that you cannot actually see to target.
The one thing I don't mind about bard sleep and why I don't think it would need less of a timer in general is in 1 vs 1 situation, I find bard sleep easier to survive then necro/AP or a skilled thiefs blackjack. Not saying they are easier to kill just easier to live through being sung up then spelled up or completely binded IMO.
|
|
|
 Thieves blackjacking
[View all] , Abernyte, Thu 24-Aug-06 02:47 AM
  RE: Thieves blackjacking,
nepenthe ,
24-Aug-06 07:42 AM, #1
 What about city ties blackjack? nt,
Splntrd,
24-Aug-06 08:32 AM, #2
 It's short. :P,
nepenthe,
24-Aug-06 08:59 AM, #3
RE: Thieves blackjacking,
Kamuela_,
24-Aug-06 09:21 AM, #4
Blackjack is far more reliable then sleep.,
Shadowmaster,
24-Aug-06 09:29 AM, #5
RE: Thieves blackjacking,
nepenthe,
24-Aug-06 09:38 AM, #6
A curious follow-up,
GinGa,
24-Aug-06 12:44 PM, #7
RE: A curious follow-up,
nepenthe,
24-Aug-06 01:52 PM, #8
Bard sleep not initiating combat...,
Tac,
24-Aug-06 03:10 PM, #9
It's a sore point for me also.,
Shadowmaster,
24-Aug-06 03:23 PM, #10
Bards have some nice advantages too though but I don't ...,
Mylinos,
25-Aug-06 10:54 AM #12
RE: A curious follow-up,
v_vega,
25-Aug-06 10:59 AM, #13
How many more?,
Nivek1,
25-Aug-06 10:21 AM, #11
| |
|
