Subject: "Manacles should be looked at." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #4980
Show all folders

CerunnirMon 28-Jun-04 10:57 AM
Member since 21st Oct 2003
294 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#4980, "Manacles should be looked at."


  

          

The entrance of outlanders means there will be wanted mages trying to retrieve/raid against tribunals. I know this has been taken up before, and the answer was "Use wands/scrolls". This might be possible yes, but it will limit the strenght of the mage by ALOT, a #### load in fact. I dont think manacles have been changed much in a long, long time. So it dont conincide with the current situation of the game. Why should a level 20 warrior be able to remove all the offensive power of a mage, which depend on casting to retrieve effectivly. That you can use wands, really, isnt enaugh if you face an enemy in PK range. If you have imm knowledge, or general sick knowledge of wands.. maybe. But against a fairly skilled player that might prep abit, it wont work.

Really, really consider atleast making manacles work like immolation'ish. Making spells fail sometimes, that would make them more tuned in with the backdraw warrior types get from them.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicManacles should be looked at. [View all] , Cerunnir, Mon 28-Jun-04 10:57 AM
Reply RE: Manacles should be looked at., Hutto, 29-Jun-04 11:57 AM, #19
Reply RE: Manacles should be looked at., Valkenar, 28-Jun-04 04:15 PM, #6
Reply To the imms, Wilhath, 28-Jun-04 12:56 PM, #1
     Reply Heh., Cerunnir, 28-Jun-04 01:53 PM, #2
     Reply The point has been made in the past., permanewbie, 28-Jun-04 03:45 PM, #4
          Reply Well. You are missing the point., Cerunnir, 28-Jun-04 04:01 PM, #5
               Reply RE: Well. You are missing the point., Grurk Muouk, 28-Jun-04 07:09 PM, #8
                    Reply RE: Well. You are missing the point., Balrahd, 28-Jun-04 08:43 PM, #9
                    Reply RE: Well. You are missing the point., Narissa, 28-Jun-04 09:09 PM, #10
                    Reply RE: Well. You are missing the point., thornheart, 29-Jun-04 04:36 AM, #16
                    Reply RE: Well. You are missing the point., Grurk Muouk, 29-Jun-04 03:40 PM, #20
                         Reply RE: Well. You are missing the point., Alynana, 30-Jun-04 08:55 AM, #23
                              Reply without wishing to spoonfeed, incognito, 30-Jun-04 09:21 AM, #24
                                   Reply RE: without wishing to spoonfeed, Alynana, 30-Jun-04 09:47 AM, #25
                                   Reply hold on, incognito, 30-Jun-04 10:31 AM, #26
                                        Reply RE: hold on, Alynana, 30-Jun-04 11:01 AM, #27
                                        Reply can't argue with that, incognito, 30-Jun-04 11:07 AM, #28
                                        Reply RE: hold on, Hutto, 30-Jun-04 12:24 PM, #30
                                        Reply You're missing the point. It should not be that goddamn..., Little Timmy (Anonymous), 30-Jun-04 12:20 PM, #29
                                   Reply RE: Mysuggestion is:, Balrahd, 01-Jul-04 12:50 AM, #34
                                        Reply RE: Mysuggestion is:, incognito, 01-Jul-04 04:23 AM, #35
                    Reply RE: Well. You are missing the point., Xaannix, 28-Jun-04 10:51 PM, #11
                         Reply I think..., permanewbie, 28-Jun-04 11:38 PM, #12
                              Reply Im sure, Xaannix, 28-Jun-04 11:54 PM, #13
                                   Reply exactly., permanewbie, 29-Jun-04 12:28 AM, #14
                                        Reply Look. To be clear:, Balrahd, 29-Jun-04 01:15 AM, #15
                                        Reply RE: Look. To be clear:, Grurk Muouk, 29-Jun-04 04:05 PM, #21
                                             Reply RE: Look. To be clear:, Balrahd, 30-Jun-04 02:48 AM, #22
                                             Reply No. There is no comparison. There is no contrast., Little Timmy (Anonymous), 30-Jun-04 12:25 PM, #31
                                                  Reply RE: No. There is no comparison. There is no contrast., Grurk Muouk, 30-Jun-04 03:32 PM, #32
                                                       Reply RE: No. There is no comparison. There is no contrast., Little Timmy (Anonymous), 30-Jun-04 04:12 PM, #33
                                        Reply I just dont see it, Xaannix, 29-Jun-04 07:32 AM, #17
                                             Reply there is that one scroll, incognito, 29-Jun-04 10:42 AM, #18
     Reply I disagree. This is a serious issue., Little Timmy (Anonymous), 28-Jun-04 02:30 PM, #3
          Reply Serious or not, it's been beaten to death..., Wilhath, 28-Jun-04 06:17 PM, #7
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #4980 Previous topic | Next topic