Habbs | Tue 24-Aug-10 02:30 PM |
Member since 06th Mar 2008
198 posts
| |
|
#35013, "Adekar - Sword of the Heavens PBF Comment"
|
Hey Adekar, or anyone else that has input on it...
In Miyo graveyard thread you mentioned CG specifically in taking sword of the heavens if they want to PK, and it got me wondering again if there is more than meets the eye on that edge.
The helpfile specifically only says that it lowers the threshhold to call higher level angels, like many of the other conjurer edges do for different conjurations. Is that all it does really? And if so, what benefit at all does such an expensive edge give if you are consistently getting archangels without it?
I keep wanting to convince myself that there is someting more to it, but in the times I've taken it I didn't see anything. If anything, when I took it it messed me up in getting archangels because I was putting too much mana into calling angels at first and I had to start experimenting again to find a good mana input to get them again.
|
|
|
Adekar - Sword of the Heavens PBF Comment
[View all] , Habbs, Tue 24-Aug-10 02:30 PM
late question,
CuriousConjurer (Anonymous),
22-Oct-10 08:12 PM, #32
RE: late question,
Habbs,
22-Oct-10 10:13 PM, #33
RE: late question,
CuriousConjurer (Anonymous),
23-Oct-10 09:55 AM, #34
Well,
Drag0nSt0rm,
24-Oct-10 02:03 PM, #35
RE: Well,
CuriousConjurer (Anonymous),
24-Oct-10 05:17 PM, #36
I don't know about discuss prereq,
Drag0nSt0rm,
24-Oct-10 06:08 PM, #37
RE: Adekar - Sword of the Heavens PBF Comment,
Daevryn,
24-Aug-10 05:45 PM, #1
*blush* I should have said according to the diku wiki i...,
Habbs,
24-Aug-10 06:06 PM, #2
I don't get it. You take the edge and get better angels...,
Lhydia,
24-Aug-10 06:17 PM, #3
this (n/t),
Daevryn,
24-Aug-10 06:27 PM, #4
<3 n/t,
Lhydia,
24-Aug-10 07:04 PM, #5
I would initially call BS if that is all it is supposed...,
Habbs,
24-Aug-10 08:10 PM, #6
RE: I would initially call BS if that is all it is supp...,
Daevryn,
24-Aug-10 08:23 PM, #7
So does sword of the heavens, celestial affinity, and t...,
Habbs,
24-Aug-10 08:25 PM, #8
Nope.,
Daevryn,
24-Aug-10 08:34 PM, #9
Always?,
Habbs,
24-Aug-10 09:46 PM, #10
With my last goodie conjie...,
Tac,
25-Aug-10 09:13 AM, #11
Same thing I saw,
Habbs,
25-Aug-10 10:27 AM, #12
Also, a question for you,
Habbs,
25-Aug-10 10:36 AM, #13
RE: With my last goodie conjie...,
Isildur,
25-Aug-10 12:41 PM, #14
RE: With my last goodie conjie...,
Tac,
25-Aug-10 01:03 PM, #15
Thanks,
Habbs,
25-Aug-10 03:53 PM, #16
RE: Thanks,
Adekar,
25-Aug-10 07:46 PM, #23
RE: Thanks,
Habbs,
26-Aug-10 10:32 AM, #29
LOL, I found some logs, and I was with you when you ran...,
Habbs,
26-Aug-10 05:01 PM, #31
then Nep has never seriously played a conjurer,
laxman,
25-Aug-10 04:54 PM, #17
RE: then Nep has never seriously played a conjurer,
Isildur,
25-Aug-10 05:12 PM, #18
Nope. :),
Daevryn,
25-Aug-10 06:34 PM, #19
RE: Nope. :),
Tac,
26-Aug-10 11:06 AM, #30
RE: then Nep has never seriously played a conjurer,
Hutto,
26-Aug-10 12:07 AM, #28
RE: With my last goodie conjie...,
Daevryn,
25-Aug-10 06:36 PM, #20
So time constraints aside....,
Gaplemo,
25-Aug-10 07:36 PM, #21
RE: So time constraints aside....,
Daevryn,
25-Aug-10 08:35 PM, #24
Thanks for the clarification!,
Gaplemo,
25-Aug-10 08:51 PM, #26
bear in mind,
laxman,
25-Aug-10 09:02 PM, #27
RE: With my last goodie conjie...,
Isildur,
25-Aug-10 07:41 PM, #22
Correct. (n/t),
Daevryn,
25-Aug-10 08:35 PM, #25
| |
|