Subject: "Adekar - Sword of the Heavens PBF Comment" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #35013
Show all folders

HabbsTue 24-Aug-10 02:30 PM
Member since 06th Mar 2008
198 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#35013, "Adekar - Sword of the Heavens PBF Comment"


          

Hey Adekar, or anyone else that has input on it...

In Miyo graveyard thread you mentioned CG specifically in taking sword of the heavens if they want to PK, and it got me wondering again if there is more than meets the eye on that edge.

The helpfile specifically only says that it lowers the threshhold to call higher level angels, like many of the other conjurer edges do for different conjurations. Is that all it does really? And if so, what benefit at all does such an expensive edge give if you are consistently getting archangels without it?

I keep wanting to convince myself that there is someting more to it, but in the times I've taken it I didn't see anything. If anything, when I took it it messed me up in getting archangels because I was putting too much mana into calling angels at first and I had to start experimenting again to find a good mana input to get them again.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicAdekar - Sword of the Heavens PBF Comment [View all] , Habbs, Tue 24-Aug-10 02:30 PM
Reply late question, CuriousConjurer (Anonymous), 22-Oct-10 08:12 PM, #32
Reply RE: late question, Habbs, 22-Oct-10 10:13 PM, #33
     Reply RE: late question, CuriousConjurer (Anonymous), 23-Oct-10 09:55 AM, #34
          Reply Well, Drag0nSt0rm, 24-Oct-10 02:03 PM, #35
               Reply RE: Well, CuriousConjurer (Anonymous), 24-Oct-10 05:17 PM, #36
                    Reply I don't know about discuss prereq, Drag0nSt0rm, 24-Oct-10 06:08 PM, #37
Reply RE: Adekar - Sword of the Heavens PBF Comment, Daevryn, 24-Aug-10 05:45 PM, #1
     Reply *blush* I should have said according to the diku wiki i..., Habbs, 24-Aug-10 06:06 PM, #2
          Reply I don't get it. You take the edge and get better angels..., Lhydia, 24-Aug-10 06:17 PM, #3
               Reply this (n/t), Daevryn, 24-Aug-10 06:27 PM, #4
               Reply <3 n/t, Lhydia, 24-Aug-10 07:04 PM, #5
               Reply I would initially call BS if that is all it is supposed..., Habbs, 24-Aug-10 08:10 PM, #6
                    Reply RE: I would initially call BS if that is all it is supp..., Daevryn, 24-Aug-10 08:23 PM, #7
                         Reply So does sword of the heavens, celestial affinity, and t..., Habbs, 24-Aug-10 08:25 PM, #8
                              Reply Nope., Daevryn, 24-Aug-10 08:34 PM, #9
                                   Reply Always?, Habbs, 24-Aug-10 09:46 PM, #10
                                        Reply With my last goodie conjie..., Tac, 25-Aug-10 09:13 AM, #11
                                             Reply Same thing I saw, Habbs, 25-Aug-10 10:27 AM, #12
                                             Reply Also, a question for you, Habbs, 25-Aug-10 10:36 AM, #13
                                             Reply RE: With my last goodie conjie..., Isildur, 25-Aug-10 12:41 PM, #14
                                                  Reply RE: With my last goodie conjie..., Tac, 25-Aug-10 01:03 PM, #15
                                                  Reply Thanks, Habbs, 25-Aug-10 03:53 PM, #16
                                                       Reply RE: Thanks, Adekar, 25-Aug-10 07:46 PM, #23
                                                            Reply RE: Thanks, Habbs, 26-Aug-10 10:32 AM, #29
                                                            Reply LOL, I found some logs, and I was with you when you ran..., Habbs, 26-Aug-10 05:01 PM, #31
                                                  Reply then Nep has never seriously played a conjurer, laxman, 25-Aug-10 04:54 PM, #17
                                                  Reply RE: then Nep has never seriously played a conjurer, Isildur, 25-Aug-10 05:12 PM, #18
                                                  Reply Nope. :), Daevryn, 25-Aug-10 06:34 PM, #19
                                                  Reply RE: Nope. :), Tac, 26-Aug-10 11:06 AM, #30
                                                  Reply RE: then Nep has never seriously played a conjurer, Hutto, 26-Aug-10 12:07 AM, #28
                                                  Reply RE: With my last goodie conjie..., Daevryn, 25-Aug-10 06:36 PM, #20
                                                       Reply So time constraints aside...., Gaplemo, 25-Aug-10 07:36 PM, #21
                                                       Reply RE: So time constraints aside...., Daevryn, 25-Aug-10 08:35 PM, #24
                                                       Reply Thanks for the clarification!, Gaplemo, 25-Aug-10 08:51 PM, #26
                                                       Reply bear in mind, laxman, 25-Aug-10 09:02 PM, #27
                                                       Reply RE: With my last goodie conjie..., Isildur, 25-Aug-10 07:41 PM, #22
                                                            Reply Correct. (n/t), Daevryn, 25-Aug-10 08:35 PM, #25
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #35013 Previous topic | Next topic