|
#30294, "So get rid of the rule then..."
|
You've effectively just admitted that obeying Tribunal law is not fundamental to being a paladin at all - in which case why include it in the paladin code? After all, you and I both know that the rationale behind article 9 has nothing to do with the essential 'goodness' of the laws of the land, but is rather designed to avoid the undesireable consequences of getting wanted and having to fight good-aligned guards. It is a tautology - subsumed by the other bits of the code that say 'don't intentionally harm those of the light'. So get rid of it.
I mean. I'd rather keep the rule and just ban all paladins from attacking in town for game balance reasons, but at least this way less n00bs will think Galadon is safe with a paladin is in range, and will not get assbagged by the cheap hidden room summon trick.
Maybe you could also address what I see as the blatant double standards in play. I recently had an char (Jysste) straight anathed by a snooping IMM for attacking a village applicant in Seantryn with no Tribunal present (no chance to argue situationally that Imperial law was being served, in the same way that a paladin would defend himself to charges that he was dishonouring the code). Also I had a very in depth conversatino with Baerinika about this very topic with my paladin (who also got a smack on the wrist for attacking in town). Her argument boiled down to "innocents might get harmed by fighting in town". If that's good enough for the patron IMM of Fort, it should be good enough for all paladins.
|
|
|
RP Pet-Peeves: All for a better 2010.
[View all] , Jhyrbian, Fri 29-Jan-10 07:07 PM
RE: RP Pet-Peeves: All for a better 2010.,
Malakhi,
06-Feb-10 01:17 AM, #85
Well written posts and...,
Arrna (Guest),
06-Feb-10 02:45 AM, #86
I respectfully disagree,
quas (Guest),
06-Feb-10 06:18 AM, #87
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Isildur,
06-Feb-10 10:29 AM, #88
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Dervish2 (Guest),
06-Feb-10 11:16 AM, #89
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Isildur,
06-Feb-10 05:50 PM, #93
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Adarmar (Guest),
06-Feb-10 10:03 PM, #94
I agree and disagree.,
Pro (Guest),
06-Feb-10 04:15 PM, #92
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Malakhi,
06-Feb-10 11:42 AM, #90
Good post. n/t,
Pro (Guest),
06-Feb-10 03:01 PM, #91
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Daevryn,
13-Feb-10 11:22 PM, #95
But it does happen and it did happen a lot more in the ...,
Pro (Guest),
14-Feb-10 12:05 AM, #96
The Empire,
AlphaQ (Guest),
31-Jan-10 02:10 PM, #68
RE: The Empire,
AlphaQ (Guest),
31-Jan-10 02:12 PM, #69
I have no idea,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
31-Jan-10 02:19 PM, #70
Cosign (n/t),
Daevryn,
31-Jan-10 03:25 PM, #71
Double cosignation. n/t,
Graatch (Guest),
31-Jan-10 05:48 PM, #74
If you say so, but I don't know that this is practiced.,
Pro (Guest),
31-Jan-10 03:57 PM, #72
Posted on wrong thread. n/t,
Pro (Guest),
31-Jan-10 04:12 PM, #73
RE: I have no idea,
AlphaQ (Guest),
01-Feb-10 02:12 AM, #75
But WHAT about empire is the problem? nt,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
01-Feb-10 03:48 AM, #76
RE: But WHAT about empire is the problem? nt,
AlphaQ (Guest),
01-Feb-10 04:34 AM, #77
Also just the Empire in general, again I know its part ...,
AlphaQ (Guest),
01-Feb-10 04:40 AM, #78
Being realistic,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
01-Feb-10 02:15 PM, #79
RE: Being realistic,
Daevryn,
01-Feb-10 02:27 PM, #80
Was a certain box also nerfed?,
incognito,
03-Feb-10 05:11 PM, #84
RE: RP Pet-Peeves: All for a better 2010.,
Amused (Guest),
29-Jan-10 02:50 PM, #63
misuse of the world 'grief'. nt,
marcus213 (Guest),
28-Jan-10 05:46 PM, #53
Seconded (n/t),
Daevryn,
28-Jan-10 06:49 PM, #54
Thirded n/t,
Klaak,
01-Feb-10 11:50 PM, #81
OOC Griefing in response to IC behavior,
Zen,
28-Jan-10 03:58 PM, #50
Yeah, that sucks,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
28-Jan-10 07:13 PM, #57
I'd severely or full loot you for such ####ty RPing. nt,
Dervish,
29-Jan-10 07:49 AM, #59
Pet Peeves 2010.,
SideStrider,
22-Jan-10 11:09 PM, #30
RE: Pet Peeves 2010.,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 11:14 PM, #31
RE: Pet Peeves 2010.,
Dweeble (Guest),
23-Jan-10 06:36 PM, #40
RE: Pet Peeves 2010.,
Daevryn,
23-Jan-10 09:23 PM, #43
RE: Pet Peeves 2010.,
SideStrider,
23-Jan-10 11:49 PM, #45
RE: Pet Peeves 2010.,
Daevryn,
24-Jan-10 12:01 AM, #46
Paladins that #### on the code,
NMTehW (Guest),
22-Jan-10 09:51 PM, #23
RE: Paladins that #### on the code,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 09:53 PM, #25
RE: Paladins that #### on the code,
Asyguest (Guest),
22-Jan-10 10:26 PM, #26
RE: Paladins that #### on the code,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 10:30 PM, #27
So get rid of the rule then...,
NMtehW (Guest),
23-Jan-10 06:02 PM #37
I agree. I think Paladins are held to to liberal a stan...,
Pro (Guest),
23-Jan-10 06:24 PM, #39
RE: So get rid of the rule then...,
Daevryn,
23-Jan-10 09:19 PM, #42
Way to miss/deliberately ignore the main point:,
NMTehW (Guest),
24-Jan-10 08:48 AM, #47
RE: Way to miss/deliberately ignore the main point:,
Tangni (Guest),
28-Jan-10 04:49 PM, #51
RE: Way to miss/deliberately ignore the main point:,
Tangni (Guest),
28-Jan-10 04:52 PM, #52
Notice how certain players,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
28-Jan-10 07:09 PM, #56
RE: Notice how certain players,
Tangi (Guest),
29-Jan-10 09:10 AM, #60
RE: Notice how certain players,
Tangni (Guest),
29-Jan-10 09:16 AM, #61
And both the imms and I,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
29-Jan-10 06:42 PM, #65
Yes, yes we got it. You was a greate roleplayer and bad...,
Alex (Guest),
29-Jan-10 06:50 PM, #66
Many paladins though,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
28-Jan-10 07:06 PM, #55
Bitch please,
NMTehW (Guest),
29-Jan-10 01:58 PM, #62
RE: Bitch please,
Daevryn,
29-Jan-10 03:02 PM, #64
RE: Bitch please,
Tangni (Guest),
29-Jan-10 02:48 PM, #67
RE: Bitch please,
Isildur,
14-Feb-10 11:15 AM, #97
There are quite a few variables.,
Lyristeon,
24-Jan-10 09:23 AM, #48
character pk builds that...,
Odrirg,
22-Jan-10 06:44 PM, #21
I like you man, but you gotta close the logic loop.,
Pro (Guest),
22-Jan-10 09:36 PM, #22
Except...,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 09:52 PM, #24
I was a machinegunner in the infantry.,
Pro (Guest),
22-Jan-10 10:32 PM, #28
good campfire talk /= good argument nt,
Splntrd,
22-Jan-10 10:33 PM, #29
wat,
blackbird,
23-Jan-10 02:16 AM, #32
RE: I was a machinegunner in the infantry.,
Amused (Guest),
23-Jan-10 03:45 AM, #33
I was refering to Daevryns comment.,
Pro (Guest),
23-Jan-10 11:24 AM, #34
RE: I was refering to Daevryns comment.,
Amused (Guest),
23-Jan-10 01:59 PM, #35
Went to.,
Pro (Guest),
23-Jan-10 03:17 PM, #36
Shut up America hater n/t,
NMTehW (Guest),
23-Jan-10 06:06 PM, #38
You missed my point.,
Odrirg,
23-Jan-10 06:47 PM, #41
Gotcha. That's lamer than lame. n/t,
Pro (Guest),
23-Jan-10 11:01 PM, #44
Just one thing...,
TMNS_lazy (Guest),
20-Jan-10 09:52 AM, #6
RE: RP Pet-Peeves: All for a better 2010.,
Isildur,
20-Jan-10 09:39 AM, #5
You shouldn't. Next.,
jhyrb (Guest),
20-Jan-10 05:51 PM, #9
Semi-Agree,
Valkenar,
20-Jan-10 09:09 AM, #4
There is an intresting thing about this...,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 10:14 AM, #7
Man, I agree with so much,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
20-Jan-10 03:51 AM, #2
Worth adding,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
20-Jan-10 03:52 AM, #3
ESL murder Gnome Air/Off shifters.,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 12:59 AM, #1
It was YOU!!!,
Klaak,
20-Jan-10 05:52 PM, #8
So simply stop talking like a powergamer?,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 06:21 PM, #12
And to clarify...,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 06:24 PM, #13
I'm so glad I can pick you out so easily,
dwimmerling,
20-Jan-10 06:52 PM, #15
You seem to have missed the point...,
Klaak,
20-Jan-10 08:05 PM, #16
Dude, Pro is a black hole of attention, the ultimate tr...,
Lhydia,
20-Jan-10 09:15 PM, #18
It's infinitely better just to make him not want to pla...,
Scrimbul,
21-Jan-10 02:37 AM, #19
I honestly do not remember setting this forum avatar. n...,
Scrimbul,
21-Jan-10 02:40 AM, #20
Road,
House (Guest),
24-Jan-10 11:00 AM, #49
That was the best part of that episode. NT,
TMNS_lazy (Guest),
28-Jan-10 07:30 PM, #58
RE: You seem to have missed the point...,
colospgsbryan2 (Guest),
03-Feb-10 02:45 AM, #82
ROFL. The gem rant slayed me.,
TMNS_lazy (Guest),
20-Jan-10 08:21 PM, #17
See that punctuation thing I don't get,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
20-Jan-10 06:16 PM, #10
the meaning isn't clear if you don't punctuate.,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 06:19 PM, #11
And thank you. :) n/t,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 06:31 PM, #14
RE: ESL murder Gnome Air/Off shifters.,
DurNominator,
03-Feb-10 10:46 AM, #83
| |
|