>This already exists for every cabal out there.
>
>Woe is the Outlander arguing against a Tribunal about what a
>Tribunal should or shouldn't be doing.

I've never understood this, as a blanket rule. Sure, some outlanders are wildmen who have never seen civilization, but I don't see any reason that most of them couldn't know what tribunals should or shouldn't do. There's a difference between agreeing with a set of rules, and understanding it. Using someone's rules against them seems perfectly reasonable thing for an Outlander to do. That is, of course different from simply whining because they didn't follow their rules. But arguing them into a corner to your advantage seems okay.