Valkenar | Fri 22-Jun-07 10:31 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1203 posts
| |
|
#18156, "Yup. Tedium is so 1994."
|
A good part of the reason I don't play frequently more than I do is because I'm not interested in spending a huge amount of time (like 50 hours) searching for wands with every character. There are a lot of fun video games that don't require that kind of tedium.
I think this is the reality of online multiplayer gaming these days, and CF needs to adapt or just accept that gamers have matured (and new gamers are coming in with a different mindset) and almost nobody finds it fun to hunt and hunt for things anymore. Every game that has items in locations, has a host of sites dedicated to people sharing that information, because 99% of people just don't enjoy searching for very much.
Also, because CF has permanent character death, there needs to be a minimum of tedious tasks repeated every character. MMORGS get away with an awful lot of boring grinding, because people can do it once and then put it behind them. CF has way less grinding, but what there is has to be repeated for every character.
Skill practice is quite an old horse, but it is an area where a (relatively small) amount of tedium is pretty necesary for many classes. but I think it would be to swap the use-based improvement system to a purely level-based system. e.g. you gain an int/wis-based increase in skill % every level. Imm rewards would still have an effect, as would quests. Frankly, the only thing the use-based system does is reward people who are willing to do a bunch of tedium. I suppose it also benefits the few rare people who know where the holes in the system are so they can max their skills easily even on low-int races.
Level-grinding is mostly okay, though I don't think experience-loss (via mob or WANTED) adds anything to the game. There are other ways to penalize these things without resorting to increasing tedium.
|
|
|
Does the current wand system encourage more cheating?
[View all] , jasmin, Thu 21-Jun-07 12:36 PM
RE: Does the current wand system encourage more cheatin...,
Rade,
02-Aug-07 11:34 AM, #71
No, for I don't bother to make a list of wands that mig...,
DurNominator,
27-Jun-07 11:39 PM, #36
RE: Does the current wand system encourage more cheatin...,
Doge,
22-Jun-07 11:15 AM, #11
RE: Does the current wand system encourage more cheatin...,
Gabe,
22-Jun-07 08:12 PM, #20
Heh, in the last RS incarnation,
Tac,
25-Jun-07 08:26 AM, #29
I'm not sure what the point is, but this is a lie. nt,
Nightshade,
25-Jun-07 10:32 AM, #30
RE: Does the current wand system encourage more cheatin...,
Zulghinlour,
21-Jun-07 01:09 PM, #1
A little spoon for the newbies,
Mekantos,
21-Jun-07 02:07 PM, #2
Sleeks have been an endless source of frustration,
astaroth,
22-Jun-07 02:04 AM, #3
I hear you,
Torak,
22-Jun-07 05:37 PM, #17
RE: I hear you,
incognito,
24-Jun-07 03:48 PM, #24
RE: I hear you,
Torak,
24-Jun-07 10:35 PM, #28
RE: I hear you,
Isildur,
24-Jun-07 04:51 PM, #26
RE: I hear you,
Torak,
24-Jun-07 10:33 PM, #27
RE: I hear you,
Thrakburzug,
26-Jun-07 12:53 PM, #32
RE: I hear you,
Torak,
27-Jun-07 10:31 PM, #34
Your posts are almost not worth reading.,
vargal,
27-Jun-07 11:16 PM, #35
RE: Your posts are almost not worth reading.,
Gromkonk,
28-Jun-07 05:18 AM, #40
As Enarn's #1 Lackey...,
Aodh,
26-Jun-07 06:55 PM, #33
Khar,
Kastellyn,
29-Jun-07 12:23 PM, #56
RE: I hear you,
Karel,
04-Jul-07 01:32 AM, #69
RE: Sleeks have been an endless source of frustration,
incognito,
24-Jun-07 03:49 PM, #25
RE: Sleeks have been an endless source of frustration,
Eskelian,
28-Jun-07 12:20 AM, #37
RE: A little spoon for the newbies,
Rade,
29-Jul-07 03:55 PM, #70
and here it is.,
Odrirg,
22-Jun-07 07:35 AM, #4
I couldn't have said it better myself. nt,
Vladamir,
22-Jun-07 07:42 AM, #5
Sleek Wand Finding,
Twist,
22-Jun-07 08:36 AM, #7
Nepenthe-ism must be contagious. ~,
_Magus_,
22-Jun-07 06:09 PM, #19
Yup. Tedium is so 1994.,
Valkenar,
22-Jun-07 10:31 AM #8
RE: Yup. Tedium is so 1994.,
Isildur,
22-Jun-07 02:34 PM, #14
I don't have to play mages,
Valkenar,
22-Jun-07 04:04 PM, #16
RE: and here it is.,
Zulghinlour,
22-Jun-07 02:12 PM, #13
Quick question,
_Magus_,
23-Jun-07 07:15 PM, #22
RE: Quick question,
Zulghinlour,
23-Jun-07 11:00 PM, #23
RE: and here it is.,
Sandello,
25-Jun-07 03:09 PM, #31
What I don't like.,
Vladamir,
22-Jun-07 07:52 AM, #6
A few points/opinions,
Gromkonk,
22-Jun-07 10:40 AM, #9
RE: A few points/opinions,
Kastellyn,
22-Jun-07 11:07 AM, #10
An idea,
Valkenar,
22-Jun-07 12:16 PM, #12
RE: An idea,
Isildur,
22-Jun-07 02:37 PM, #15
Yeah!,
Gromkonk,
22-Jun-07 05:41 PM, #18
I like these ideas a lot.,
Vladamir,
23-Jun-07 11:44 AM, #21
RE: I like these ideas a lot.,
Eskelian,
28-Jun-07 12:29 AM, #38
Eh.,
Daevryn,
28-Jun-07 12:50 AM, #39
So which is this?,
Valkenar,
28-Jun-07 10:38 AM, #41
You don't get it.,
vargal,
28-Jun-07 11:47 AM, #42
RE: You don't get it.,
Eskelian,
28-Jun-07 02:44 PM, #44
Kharia had one aura wand that I knew of...,
Twist,
28-Jun-07 03:48 PM, #47
No offense (+vargal response),
Valkenar,
28-Jun-07 04:26 PM, #49
RE: Kharia had one aura wand that I knew of...,
Eskelian,
29-Jun-07 10:33 AM, #52
Keep in mind that 2/1 wasn't a ratio...,
Twist,
29-Jun-07 11:37 AM, #53
RE: Keep in mind that 2/1 wasn't a ratio...,
Eskelian,
29-Jun-07 01:21 PM, #59
RE: Kharia had one aura wand that I knew of...,
Adhelard,
29-Jun-07 12:10 PM, #55
Fine, replace Hunsobo with "Any Village Berserker". n/...,
Eskelian,
29-Jun-07 01:15 PM, #58
Well, I disagree,
Valkenar,
29-Jun-07 03:54 PM, #60
RE: Well, I disagree,
Daevryn,
29-Jun-07 04:32 PM, #61
RE: Well, I disagree,
Eskelian,
29-Jun-07 04:42 PM, #62
RE: Well, I disagree,
Daevryn,
29-Jun-07 07:32 PM, #63
RE: Well, I disagree,
Torak,
29-Jun-07 09:26 PM, #64
RE: Well, I disagree,
Daevryn,
29-Jun-07 10:55 PM, #65
But, there I'm already getting off the point...,
Daevryn,
29-Jun-07 10:59 PM, #66
That's true,
Valkenar,
30-Jun-07 12:55 PM, #67
RE: Well, I disagree,
Eskelian,
02-Jul-07 12:06 PM, #68
RE: So which is this?,
Daevryn,
28-Jun-07 02:41 PM, #43
RE: So which is this?,
Eskelian,
28-Jun-07 02:51 PM, #45
RE: So which is this?,
Daevryn,
28-Jun-07 03:07 PM, #46
RE: So which is this?,
Eskelian,
29-Jun-07 10:22 AM, #51
I endorse this post. n/t,
Sandello,
29-Jun-07 12:02 PM, #54
Some feeback,
Valkenar,
28-Jun-07 04:11 PM, #48
oops,
Valkenar,
28-Jun-07 10:37 PM, #50
Suggestion for an addition to the current system.,
Sandello,
29-Jun-07 12:42 PM, #57
| |
|