Aarn | Wed 13-Apr-05 07:58 AM |
Member since 04th Feb 2005
566 posts
| |
|
#703, "RE: Well, as someone that tries"
|
Wouldn't my character therefore start to see him as not being evil? I'm not sure it would have been such bad rp on my part if this had happened. Nor on his, for that matter, since I can't see why an evil wouldn't such up to someone useful to him, like a transmuter.
I would say that if it gets to the point where your good character doesn't see anything wrong with an evil character, then at least one of you isn't roleplaying. I would see the evil character USING a good character... but not showing him respect or returning any kindness. You're thinking too logically, from the standpoint of a neutral player. While it might be beneficial to suck up to a good healer, most evil characters are still going to have evil tendancies that are going to override the logic. Besides, if you follow the logic that being nice to people is more useful then using and abusing them, then aren't you already acting neutral? As the good person in this equation, you should be concerned about how the evil character is using you, questioning his intentions, etc.
|
|
|
Paladins
[View all] , Vandir, Tue 12-Apr-05 05:07 PM
The Paladin Code,
Aarn,
21-Apr-05 02:24 PM, #42
My approach,
Innis,
21-Apr-05 01:30 PM, #41
RE: Paladins,
Zulghinlour,
19-Apr-05 04:39 PM, #32
Agreed,
Theerkla,
20-Apr-05 06:59 AM, #34
RE: Agreed,
Grurk Muouk,
20-Apr-05 11:35 AM, #37
The thing is, Grurk has a red aura,
Theerkla,
20-Apr-05 11:53 AM, #38
Whatever works for your char's role.,
Alarian,
20-Apr-05 01:48 PM, #39
Here's how I did it as a mortal.,
Alarian,
17-Apr-05 07:17 PM, #30
RE: Paladins,
nepenthe,
12-Apr-05 05:36 PM, #1
On that note...,
Aarn,
12-Apr-05 06:34 PM, #2
Well, as someone that tries,
incognito,
12-Apr-05 06:45 PM, #3
RE: Well, as someone that tries,
Aarn,
13-Apr-05 07:58 AM #4
RE: Well, as someone that tries,
Rodriguez,
13-Apr-05 11:14 AM, #5
RE: Well, as someone that tries,
Aarn,
13-Apr-05 11:41 AM, #6
So I could say, Rape a nine year old Florida girl, and ...,
(NOT Pro),
13-Apr-05 05:10 PM, #7
I hate you for this post, but,
Wilhath,
13-Apr-05 05:40 PM, #8
his arguments are not mutually exclusive,
incognito,
13-Apr-05 09:36 PM, #10
RE: his arguments are not mutually exclusive,
Wilhath,
14-Apr-05 04:02 PM, #12
Not quite,
Aarn,
13-Apr-05 06:02 PM, #9
It's a different world.,
DurNominator,
14-Apr-05 02:15 PM, #11
Relative vrs. absolute morality,
Alarian,
15-Apr-05 08:41 AM, #13
I hope you get a religion.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 12:15 PM, #14
RE: Relative vrs. absolute morality,
DurNominator,
15-Apr-05 12:34 PM, #15
Relative Morality, Real world vs. Game world,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 12:54 PM, #16
RE: Relative Morality, Real world vs. Game world,
nepenthe,
15-Apr-05 01:03 PM, #18
sorry for getting off-subject,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 01:20 PM, #19
Whoa,
Aarn,
15-Apr-05 02:02 PM, #20
Also, to bring it back to Paladins...,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 02:12 PM, #21
RE: Also, to bring it back to Paladins...,
A2,
19-Apr-05 04:19 PM, #31
No.,
Odrirg,
19-Apr-05 04:56 PM, #33
RE: No.,
A2,
20-Apr-05 11:30 AM, #36
You're both right.,
Alarian,
20-Apr-05 01:56 PM, #40
Paladins shouldn't associate with evil.,
DurNominator,
20-Apr-05 10:35 AM, #35
You are bass akwards. In a big way.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 12:58 PM, #17
RE: You are bass akwards. In a big way.,
Aarn,
15-Apr-05 02:31 PM, #22
If we bring this back to CF.,
DurNominator,
15-Apr-05 03:18 PM, #23
This, I agree with. somewhat.,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 03:52 PM, #24
Me too. That's not anathema to what he's saying though.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 06:36 PM, #26
That works too.,
DurNominator,
16-Apr-05 12:41 AM, #28
Heh,. Okay. We agree.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 06:35 PM, #25
Is this about right?,
Vandir,
15-Apr-05 08:18 PM, #27
I love stuff like this.....,
Alarian,
17-Apr-05 06:59 PM, #29
| |
|