>... but you're still a top dogg C =)

no diggity

>What I don't understand is why the no-ganging rule is being
>enforced in the neo-village. If you're to be an effective,
>ruthless army, ganging is a way to go. In addition to that,
>a group of villagers has way less synergy gains than your
>average scion group. Especially, I don't think the
>no-ganging rule goes well together with the
>no-bash-potionquaffer rule. Even if you're only a
>quasi-barbarian, it doesn't make sense to cuddle people you
>hate. Moreso since the current implementation of no-ganging
>rule has nothing to do with courage.

Aside from the whole "chaotic" organization of Entropy (formal applicant process and everything!) I always wondered what the hell was going on with these new Battle ideals. I was the first guy inducted under them and apparently I had it all wrong. I assumed that it meant they were sort of hybrid, army with tactics and intelligent drive to efficiently get rid of magic comibined with the sort of Barbarian pride... meaning you better exhibit some courage and willingness to fight alone cause you're supposed to be one of the greatest warriors in the land. I really don't know why, if you were a supposedly an intelligent tactician, you'd forsake two warriors cranial'ing for one. Honor and organized war just don't mix cause that's what the 1 person vs. 1 person rule really is all about, it's clearly possible to be a courageous sort of character who will partake in gangbangs to get the job done, oh well... maybe we'll never know.