DurNominator | Thu 03-Feb-05 07:21 AM |
Member since 08th Nov 2004
2018 posts
| |
|
#34854, "Destripador.."
|
What Agantas thought of Destripador as justiciar.. Two words describe it well: Pompous ass (ass as the animal, not bodypart).
Destripador questioned his judgement, starting from the incident where I was investigating the gaunting of Synnarlo and was about to group with her in Galadon momentarily (basically to use the group command, see xp's, ungroup) to see if she has more xp than me to check whether the younger conjurer could harm her (the younger conjie could not harm me), as I didn't bother to do the math. At this stage, Destripador jumped in, forbidding Agantas to do this, as he saw it as off-duty investigation. At this stage, Agantas tossed the whole case to Destripador, as Synnarlo was getting verbally abusive (in IC fashion) as well, which is why I didn't do a theoretical calculation of their xp's.
Then there was other gaunting in Galadon, from which Agantas placed a warrant and Destripador sent him a note about off-duty investigation (naturally, there was none).
There was also the case, where an orc butchered Agantas's corpse and his groupmates took Agantas's items from the ground. Destripador basically said that Agantas was wrong to warrant the groupmate orc, who saw the butchering and quickly grabbed (though they grouped after the incident) Agantas's items while I was still trying to 'g all corpse'. The two companions were invisible when they took the stuff, so Agantas couldn't see them. After Destripador complained about this, Agantas saw a clear loophole around the law, a one even he could abuse himself.
But however, if that 'if items are on the ground after the corpse is destroyed, taking them is not looting'-policy is written somewhere in the Spire, I'd like to have someone quote it to me and explain how it should be applied in situation where there are certain knowledge that the items came from a corpse (Destripador didn't convince me IC).
It was really annoying as Destripador was a bad listener and too eager to judge Agantas's opinions (which was something Agantas didn't like), which is why Agantas formed a negative opinion conserning him. Basically, every time when Agatas was reprimanded by Destripador, Agantas thought that Destripador was speaking without adequate knowledge of the situation.
Anyway, a nice character. Good luck with your next!
|
|
|
(DELETED) [TRIBUNAL] Destripador the Hand of the Unseen...
[View all] , Death_Angel, Mon 31-Jan-05 03:40 AM
You were around for a long time...,
Mela (Guest),
02-Feb-05 04:38 AM, #1
ermm,ok,I guess an explanation is in order.,
Destripador (Guest),
02-Feb-05 10:08 PM, #2
So long...,
Klendalstak (Guest),
02-Feb-05 11:38 PM, #3
RE: ermm,ok,I guess an explanation is in order.,
Rom (Guest),
03-Feb-05 01:41 AM, #4
Destripador..,
DurNominator,
03-Feb-05 07:21 AM #5
RE: Destripador..,
Destripador (Guest),
03-Feb-05 05:41 PM, #10
Any "slaughterings" I saw you guys do,
Iborenn (Guest),
03-Feb-05 03:08 PM, #6
I'll vouch for this.,
Alathin (Guest),
04-Feb-05 01:05 AM, #15
A side note,
DurNominator,
04-Feb-05 12:00 PM, #16
heh,
Malzh (Guest),
03-Feb-05 03:59 PM, #7
Here you go.,
Malzh (Guest),
03-Feb-05 04:25 PM, #8
As a side note.,
Malzh (Guest),
03-Feb-05 04:43 PM, #9
RE: As a side note.,
Destripador (Guest),
03-Feb-05 06:00 PM, #11
Thanks,
Destripador (Guest),
03-Feb-05 06:25 PM, #12
Last Names...,
Grurk Muouk,
03-Feb-05 06:54 PM, #13
Am I reading this right?,
Alarian,
03-Feb-05 08:19 PM, #14
| |
|