>>>When I try, it says "You can't take that."
>>>Is it now intended?
>>
>>Yup.
>>
>>>It makes things very inconvenient.
>>
>>And?
>
>Well, less fun. If this is not of importance, then what is?

Less fun in that you can no longer exploit it? I could change it from a pouch to a chest, and nobody would think twice that it could no longer be picked up.

>I wanted to ask about "for now". Can I take it as a hint that some
>time in the future it can be refixed? For example, if such items
>as this pouch just never resetted their content, it would be much
>easier, much more realistic and intuitive.

In the long run, we might track down this problem and try and fix it as you suggest (I actually looked at that briefly) but I usually go for the quick and simple fix to something that is potentially completely unbalancing. I also ask myself something like, is it going to matter if someone can't pick up this pouch, and the answer is no. It's not.

>You get it, fine. You empty and drop it, even at the same place,
>and it never resets until you remove it and let the next one
>appear.
>
>Well, I understand you are a busy man, but if you take a
>minute and explain why this is worse than your fix, I'd appreciate
>it.

It's worse in that it's alot more work to fix, and potentially dangerous in totally screwing up the way resets of things into containers works.

>
>Thanks.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!