If you guys are endorsing these FAQs, they need to be as accurate as you can possibly make them. These ARE newbies who rely on them, not vets. So they won't know what is and isn't accurate, and if something incorrect causes problems, that'll probably make them bitter.

Barring Imm edits on the FAQs, you could just put a note before reading the FAQ, that none of the information within is verified by Imms so shouldn't be considered 100% accurate. Although that seems like it just doubles the information available on QHCF, which seems like a waste of time.

QHCF is great for discussing and guessing about information. Official forums should serve as a source of accurate information, not guesses.