>I'm not about to suggest a new system, but you haven't>either. You're suggesting improvements to the old system.You're right...because I still haven't seen a system suggested that I think is worthy to replace it, and you are one more person not offering a suggestion.>While these are all positive changes, the system itself is>still bad. The positives you're suggesting still result in a>net negative. If you're hoping to produce something>worthwhile, you'd be better off scrapping the old system. So suggest a better one.>The flip side of the coin is that, with the enormous amount of>work you guys have put into the old system, it's pretty>unrealistic to ask you guys to start back at square one. I completely re-wrote dual wield because it was an enormous piece of ####. It's not unrealistic to think we'd scrap something entirely and re-write it if something was vastly superior.>With>that in mind, these are pretty acceptable improvements. Now>get back to work on the important stuff, like the Shaman>revamp.Shamans? Screw them!
HTML use enabled
Smilies option ON Smilies lookup table