Subject: "RE: You shouldn't...." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23752
Show all folders

ScrimbulFri 13-Feb-09 01:59 PM
Member since 22nd Apr 2003
884 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM Click to send message via ICQ
#23805, "RE: You shouldn't...."


  

          

>It won't really solve anything and eventually create more
>problem in the long run. The system will still suck and the
>game will suffer as a result. Newbies will get the shaft and
>ooc knowledge sharing will continue. Frankly even if i knew
>every possibly location, just the fact i have to go everywhere
>searching for each one would tick me off. It makes the entire
>thing pointless and irritating.
>
>I myself have not started a new mage since the change and
>probably will not either. The tedium isn't worth the amount of
>fun i get. I can't help but think that if mages become as
>popular as healers currently are then the point might get
>across but either way it currently is what it is...

I'm with LM. If he has the information (and he's one of the rare players anal enough and cunning enough to get into the Imms heads when they go hiding wands) let him bust the info wide-open ICly. He may as well start sending notes to all or note to cabal. None of those methods break rules and while the locations will be moved and have to be found again, it'll continue that way until either the sets are put back in, the wands are completely removed from the game or it's entirely rebalanced some other way.

For instance I'm really partial to thieves and bards even if I'm not yet really good at either. But I'd like to actually make a real go at a conjurer. Given how much I hate exploration due to the mix of old and new areas, generic tedium, and Detect Artifact still being level 51, that's not going to happen anytime soon. Instead I'll just keep picking up tidbits from whatever mage allies I get who still have sleeks.

You have three locations out of ####ing potentially 50 or 60 in the entire game even removing the locations your ethos will prevent you from getting. Those are ####ing terrible odds no matter how simple/complicated each individual location is.


Bard Repertoire Clarifications:
http://forums.carrionfields.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=6&topic_id=23735&mesg_id=23735&page=

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicWand changes. [View all] , Xanthrailles, Wed 11-Feb-09 07:23 PM
Reply Just give it up, don't play mages, Valkenar, 13-Feb-09 11:51 AM, #50
Reply How about this..., Iza, 12-Feb-09 09:16 PM, #44
Reply RE: How about this..., Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 10:14 PM, #45
     Reply Well..., Iza, 12-Feb-09 11:41 PM, #47
          Reply RE: Well..., Daevryn, 13-Feb-09 12:08 AM, #48
Reply If you're an Imm in the know I bet it's way more fun!~, Enbuergo1, 12-Feb-09 05:39 PM, #36
Reply It doesn't, JMCC, 12-Feb-09 01:13 PM, #28
Reply RE: Wand changes., Grudan, 12-Feb-09 11:21 AM, #22
Reply RE: Wand changes., Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:50 PM, #30
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Grudan, 12-Feb-09 02:24 PM, #31
Reply RE: Wand changes., MRSK, 12-Feb-09 10:44 AM, #21
Reply How many mages have you played since the change?, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:45 PM, #29
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Baerinika, 12-Feb-09 03:43 PM, #33
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 04:28 PM, #34
          Reply I have no idea what you're trying to say, Baerinika, 12-Feb-09 05:02 PM, #35
          Reply No, no, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 05:52 PM, #37
               Reply We will see how things go, Rayihn, 12-Feb-09 05:54 PM, #38
          Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 07:55 PM, #40
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, MRSK, 12-Feb-09 06:12 PM, #39
          Reply Man Alex, you really need to lighten the #### up., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 08:45 PM, #42
               Reply Nah, less than two now:), MRSK, 12-Feb-09 09:14 PM, #43
Reply Anyone find it a positive?, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 07:10 AM, #9
Reply What I find ironic, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 08:05 AM, #11
Reply RE: What I find ironic, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:19 AM, #13
Reply I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 08:38 AM, #15
     Reply RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:57 AM, #19
          Reply RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:53 AM, #26
Reply RE: What I find ironic, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:37 AM, #23
     Reply Pretty simple, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 11:42 AM, #25
          Reply RE: Pretty simple, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:54 AM, #27
Reply I do, DurNominator, 12-Feb-09 02:25 PM, #32
     Reply It has nothing to do with powergaming when, EXB, 13-Feb-09 01:26 PM, #51
Reply This change is bad for ragers as well, MRSK, 12-Feb-09 01:32 AM, #7
Reply I just don't understand why they don't make sleek sets ..., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 01:12 AM, #6
Reply This already exists, Rayihn, 12-Feb-09 07:22 AM, #10
     Reply RE: This already exists, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:23 AM, #12
     Reply RE: This already exists, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 08:31 AM, #14
          Reply RE: This already exists, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:42 AM, #16
          Reply RE: This already exists, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 08:50 AM, #17
               Reply Mistaken, thought one mage-class does not have scrolls ..., Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:55 AM, #18
          Reply Well, I would ask you to do me a favor..., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 08:49 PM, #41
     Reply RE: This already exists, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:39 AM, #24
Reply Agreed, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:08 AM, #5
Reply RE: Wand changes., Isildur, 11-Feb-09 09:43 PM, #1
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Artificial, 11-Feb-09 10:02 PM, #2
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Isildur, 11-Feb-09 11:32 PM, #3
          Reply Reasons, Artificial, 12-Feb-09 01:02 AM, #4
               Reply RE: Reasons, Isildur, 12-Feb-09 10:15 AM, #20
                    Reply Well, I am personally..., Lightmage, 12-Feb-09 11:37 PM, #46
                         Reply You shouldn't...., Iza, 13-Feb-09 12:25 AM, #49
                              Reply RE: You shouldn't...., Scrimbul, 13-Feb-09 01:59 PM #52
     Reply RE: Wand changes., MRSK, 12-Feb-09 01:46 AM, #8
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23752 Previous topic | Next topic