|
DurNominator | Thu 12-Feb-09 02:25 PM |
Member since 08th Nov 2004
2018 posts
|   |
|
#23785, "I do"
|
Sleeks are explorer perks meant as rewards for people who enjoy exploring. The system were the sleeks were gathered as sets wasn't sensible, as you could, if you knew the set, deduct the location of all if you knew one. This was a bad design and now it's changed. There are now new, more magey and more personalized locations that make more sense than the old ones. Overall, it was a great change although I can understand that powergamers are whining about how their powergaming got more tedious as the use of their OOC/previously obtained information was devalued in the process.
|
|
|
 Wand changes.
[View all] , Xanthrailles, Wed 11-Feb-09 07:23 PM
  Just give it up, don't play mages,
Valkenar,
13-Feb-09 11:51 AM, #50
How about this...,
Iza,
12-Feb-09 09:16 PM, #44
  RE: How about this...,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 10:14 PM, #45
Well...,
Iza,
12-Feb-09 11:41 PM, #47
RE: Well...,
Daevryn,
13-Feb-09 12:08 AM, #48
If you're an Imm in the know I bet it's way more fun!~,
Enbuergo1,
12-Feb-09 05:39 PM, #36
It doesn't,
JMCC,
12-Feb-09 01:13 PM, #28
RE: Wand changes.,
Grudan,
12-Feb-09 11:21 AM, #22
RE: Wand changes.,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:50 PM, #30
RE: Wand changes.,
Grudan,
12-Feb-09 02:24 PM, #31
RE: Wand changes.,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 10:44 AM, #21
How many mages have you played since the change?,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:45 PM, #29
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Baerinika ,
12-Feb-09 03:43 PM, #33
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 04:28 PM, #34
I have no idea what you're trying to say,
Baerinika,
12-Feb-09 05:02 PM, #35
No, no,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 05:52 PM, #37
We will see how things go,
Rayihn,
12-Feb-09 05:54 PM, #38
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 07:55 PM, #40
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 06:12 PM, #39
Man Alex, you really need to lighten the #### up.,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 08:45 PM, #42
Nah, less than two now:),
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 09:14 PM, #43
Anyone find it a positive?,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 07:10 AM, #9
What I find ironic,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 08:05 AM, #11
RE: What I find ironic,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:19 AM, #13
I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 08:38 AM, #15
RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:57 AM, #19
RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:53 AM, #26
RE: What I find ironic,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:37 AM, #23
Pretty simple,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 11:42 AM, #25
RE: Pretty simple,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:54 AM, #27
I do,
DurNominator,
12-Feb-09 02:25 PM #32
It has nothing to do with powergaming when,
EXB,
13-Feb-09 01:26 PM, #51
This change is bad for ragers as well,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 01:32 AM, #7
I just don't understand why they don't make sleek sets ...,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 01:12 AM, #6
This already exists,
Rayihn,
12-Feb-09 07:22 AM, #10
RE: This already exists,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:23 AM, #12
RE: This already exists,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 08:31 AM, #14
RE: This already exists,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:42 AM, #16
RE: This already exists,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 08:50 AM, #17
Mistaken, thought one mage-class does not have scrolls ...,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:55 AM, #18
Well, I would ask you to do me a favor...,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 08:49 PM, #41
RE: This already exists,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:39 AM, #24
Agreed,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:08 AM, #5
RE: Wand changes.,
Isildur,
11-Feb-09 09:43 PM, #1
RE: Wand changes.,
Artificial,
11-Feb-09 10:02 PM, #2
RE: Wand changes.,
Isildur,
11-Feb-09 11:32 PM, #3
Reasons,
Artificial,
12-Feb-09 01:02 AM, #4
RE: Reasons,
Isildur,
12-Feb-09 10:15 AM, #20
Well, I am personally...,
Lightmage,
12-Feb-09 11:37 PM, #46
You shouldn't....,
Iza,
13-Feb-09 12:25 AM, #49
RE: You shouldn't....,
Scrimbul,
13-Feb-09 01:59 PM, #52
RE: Wand changes.,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 01:46 AM, #8
| |
|
