Subject: "RE: Two things." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #71065
Show all folders

EskelianThu 05-Jul-18 01:12 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2023 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#71127, "RE: Two things."
Edited on Thu 05-Jul-18 01:21 PM

          

The reason anti-hording code exists is to prevent people from grabbing a limited item and never putting it in any danger of being lost by not playing and thus ending the circulation of that item.

The reason to have limited items in the game is to create incentive to fight over those items and as a "hook" to make the game more interesting and attractive. To create a stronger feeling of power and loss when you die.

When there's 10 players left limited items are not much of a "hook" to get people to play. Not nearly as much as anti-hording and auto-delete are disincentives to play. Basically as it is, you're going to get the best gear in the game by being in the cabal with the most people under the way the system works right now, whereas if gear had more longevity it wouldn't be such an issue.

Bottom line? You're not going to lose anyone by removing item limits and auto-deletion, but it might be holding back what could be 20-50% of your potential population from playing. I'm 34 with a pretty big deal job and children and I'm not really interested in having a game where I *have* to play every week to keep my stuff. I'd happily play if those requirements were gone and I could just have a chill CF character that I could log in when I wanted to and was able to and put some hours in. At this stage of my life though I can't imagine "wasting" hundreds of hours on a hero that will go away when I get a big project at work. There's no way that the benefits of these systems is "worth it" by any objective measurement in such a population starved game.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicEQ [View all] , Naked and Afraid (Anonymous), Thu 28-Jun-18 02:42 PM
Reply Weekly for poof poof, not monthly. , Demos, 29-Jun-18 09:06 AM, #4
Reply That doesn't sound right, Kstatida, 29-Jun-18 12:19 PM, #6
Reply Sorry you got popped, Destuvius, 28-Jun-18 04:39 PM, #1
     Reply That's not fair, Kstatida, 28-Jun-18 09:02 PM, #2
     Reply RE: That's not fair, Saagkri, 29-Jun-18 08:53 AM, #3
          Reply I only tell cool stories, Kstatida, 29-Jun-18 12:16 PM, #5
               Reply RE: I only tell cool stories, Thaedan (Anonymous), 02-Jul-18 12:11 AM, #8
                    Reply Reality bites, Kstatida, 06-Jul-18 02:38 PM, #29
     Reply Fair enough. nt, Saagkri, 29-Jun-18 04:36 PM, #7
     Reply Two things., Eskelian, 02-Jul-18 01:06 PM, #9
          Reply RE: Two things., lasentia, 02-Jul-18 02:47 PM, #10
          Reply You didn't read my post., Eskelian, 05-Jul-18 01:16 PM, #14
               Reply Uh....that would break SO much., Jormyr, 05-Jul-18 10:48 PM, #20
                    Reply RE: Uh....that would break SO much., Eskelian, 06-Jul-18 01:59 AM, #21
          Reply RE: Two things., Thaedan (Anonymous), 02-Jul-18 02:50 PM, #11
          Reply RE: Two things., Eskelian, 05-Jul-18 01:21 PM #13
               Reply There aren't 10 players left, you keep repeating that, jalbrin, 05-Jul-18 05:12 PM, #15
               Reply RE: There aren't 10 players left, you keep repeating th..., Eskelian, 06-Jul-18 02:16 AM, #23
               Reply A few responses, Destuvius, 05-Jul-18 05:57 PM, #16
               Reply You used to be be less sensitive., Eskelian, 06-Jul-18 02:29 AM, #22
               Reply I didn't interpret that as sensitivity., robdarken_, 09-Jul-18 04:13 PM, #37
                    Reply RE: I didn't interpret that as sensitivity., Eskelian, 14-Jul-18 12:14 AM, #38
                         Reply RE: I didn't interpret that as sensitivity., robdarken_, 14-Jul-18 12:33 AM, #39
                         Reply RE: I didn't interpret that as sensitivity., Eskelian, 18-Jul-18 07:49 PM, #43
                              Reply RE: I didn't interpret that as sensitivity., Umiron, 18-Jul-18 07:57 PM, #44
                         Reply Actually, there is no improper way to level. nt, Saagkri, 14-Jul-18 02:15 PM, #41
               Reply I wish all the good humour wasn't wasted on asshats on ..., Onewingedangel, 18-Jul-18 09:38 PM, #45
               Reply RE: Two things., Thaedan (Anonymous), 05-Jul-18 08:37 PM, #17
               Reply RE: Two things., Thaedan (Anonymous), 05-Jul-18 08:43 PM, #18
               Reply Disagree, Jormyr, 05-Jul-18 10:46 PM, #19
                    Reply RE: Disagree, Eskelian, 06-Jul-18 02:18 AM, #24
                         Reply RE: Disagree, incognito, 06-Jul-18 03:01 AM, #25
                              Reply I've never had it., Eskelian, 06-Jul-18 06:53 AM, #27
                                   Reply RE: I've never had it., TheBluestThumb, 06-Jul-18 04:08 PM, #30
                                   Reply RE: I've never had it., Eskelian, 07-Jul-18 10:22 PM, #32
                                   Reply RE: I've never had it., incognito, 06-Jul-18 07:28 PM, #31
                                        Reply RE: I've never had it., Eskelian, 07-Jul-18 10:38 PM, #33
                                             Reply What you describe already exists, laxman, 07-Jul-18 11:47 PM, #34
                                                  Reply Credit where credit is due.., Onewingedangel, 15-Jul-18 10:59 AM, #42
          Reply RE: Two things., incognito, 02-Jul-18 05:24 PM, #12
          Reply RE: Two things., Jarmel, 06-Jul-18 03:14 AM, #26
               Reply You're totally right., Eskelian, 06-Jul-18 07:16 AM, #28
                    Reply RE: You're totally right., incognito, 08-Jul-18 12:40 AM, #35
                         Reply RE: You're totally right., Eskelian, 08-Jul-18 01:01 AM, #36
                         Reply PK is never boring, Kstatida, 14-Jul-18 01:13 PM, #40
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #71065 Previous topic | Next topic