Subject: "After reading ~60% of this thread..." This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23184
Show all folders

SplntrdTue 27-Jan-09 03:22 PM
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#23557, "After reading ~60% of this thread..."


          

here are my thoughts.

If you thought the system as it stood was a good system, this is a good change.

If you disliked the original system, you're going to hate it even more now.

When implementing anything into any game, or assessing potential ideas, there are two questions that I tend to ask. Firstly, is it necessary? Is it something that is required to make the game work, achieve balance, etcetera. Secondly, is it fun? Is it something that's going to make the game more interesting and dynamic. I'm sure you guys are familiar with this line of thought so I'll continue.

Was this change necessary? Depends on your goals. If your goal is to break up OOC information sharing a bit, and make the system more dynamic, this is a good change. It's well done and well thought-out.

Is implementing this change fun? I'd have to argue no. In fact, I might even argue that the entire ABS system in general is un-fun, and I don't understand where some people derive fun out of the kinds of activity the system forces you to do. You may be dispersing OOC groups a bit with this, but you're encouraging elitism by broadening the amount of area knowledge and exploring experience a single player has to have in order to know where to look for these kinds of things. Additionally, by putting a level restriction on discovering blacks you're almost requiring people to do the same world-wide search for wands twice; once at earlier levels and again at a later level for your black, because you couldn't have discovered it before. All in all, you've probably at least doubled or tripled the amount of time a given character would have to spend finding these things. Notice, not just player, but this is something you're going to have to do with every single character. That's not fun, how could that be fun? That's time that same character could be spending interacting with other people by roleplaying or PKing. And I'm not saying this change in particular causes a lack of fun, I'm saying the entire premise of the system emphasizes spending many hours of exploring with every character, and this change only exacerbates it.

So the question becomes, do the benefits of breaking up OOC groups and adding a little bit of dynamicism to the system outweigh the consequences of adding hours of un-fun non-interaction time to an already broken system?

Well, obviously, the implementors believe they do, or this wouldn't have happened.

You know, I have a really hard time with this change, because from an implementor's perspective, I have to acknowledge that, depending on your goals, it's actually quite well-done. But I'm disappointed that the staff apparently failed to consider the consequences of making something that wasn't very fun to start with even less fun.

So now the question in my mind has to be; the work has been done, obviously we have to keep this system, there's been to much work thrown into it to simply chuck it out and start over, so how can we mitigate these consequences? I believe Mek was sort of on the right track, down below. There should be quests and skills (like detect artifact) to help you find your wands. These quests need to be implemented in such a way that they are not too easily obtainable (so that not any throwaway character can get them in hopes of just discovering and compiling a list of hints), and yet accomplishable by people with less experience exploring the game. Something along the lines of "Bring me 200 gold and these ten items and I will divine for you a hint as to where your wands of power lie." would work. As implementors of a game that tries to remain flexible as far as allowing there to be multiple ways to play the game, I would think you need to consider quests as a real possibility and alternative.

That about sums up this thread for me.

Splntrd

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicSleek Aura/Barrier/Shield Wands [View all] , Daevryn, Sun 04-Jan-09 10:58 PM
Reply After reading ~60% of this thread..., Splntrd, 27-Jan-09 03:22 PM #159
Reply What we need is a newbie IMM. Which, coincedentally, i..., TheLastMohican, 27-Jan-09 04:20 PM, #160
     Reply Though optimistic this system officially makes me wish ..., EXB, 28-Jan-09 04:21 AM, #161
Reply Why?, Eskelian, 21-Jan-09 01:19 AM, #145
Reply One very good reason:, Mekantos, 21-Jan-09 02:13 AM, #150
Reply RE: One very good reason:, Eskelian, 21-Jan-09 02:19 AM, #151
Reply RE: Why?, Gabe, 26-Jan-09 11:58 PM, #158
Reply RE: Sleek Aura/Barrier/Shield Wands, Pendragon_Surtr, 17-Jan-09 08:20 AM, #144
Reply RE: Sleek Aura/Barrier/Shield Wands, Eskelian, 21-Jan-09 01:55 AM, #148
Reply My perspective from all sides..., AsidMonk, 13-Jan-09 02:18 PM, #141
Reply imo, Quixotic, 13-Jan-09 10:20 PM, #142
     Reply Can't say I disagree, AsidMonk, 14-Jan-09 02:56 AM, #143
Reply Problems/ Great for Occasional Players?, Seilclavin, 13-Jan-09 11:20 AM, #140
Reply Sounds like a great change to me. ~, Elerosse, 12-Jan-09 11:56 AM, #133
Reply As someone who doesn't keep wand lists, DurNominator, 11-Jan-09 06:25 PM, #125
Reply I haven't found a sleek wand since the Second Age., Pendragon_Surtr, 10-Jan-09 05:33 PM, #114
Reply My Idea., Iza, 10-Jan-09 10:58 AM, #112
Reply RE: My Idea., Daevryn, 10-Jan-09 05:21 PM, #113
Reply Originally..., Iza, 11-Jan-09 02:25 PM, #119
     Reply It's a good idea, just one thing., Amberion, 11-Jan-09 05:25 PM, #121
          Reply Yeah..., Dervish, 11-Jan-09 05:41 PM, #122
          Reply Heh. I agree., Iza, 11-Jan-09 06:37 PM, #126
Reply So..., Linolaques, 11-Jan-09 06:05 PM, #124
     Reply RE: So..., Iza, 11-Jan-09 07:35 PM, #127
          Reply RE: So..., Linolaques, 12-Jan-09 11:36 AM, #132
Reply I don't like this change, elmeri_, 09-Jan-09 08:55 PM, #101
Reply Cosign, Dervish, 11-Jan-09 08:59 AM, #118
Reply I agree, this is really disheartening to me., jad, 12-Jan-09 10:25 AM, #129
     Reply Regarding level playing fields and CF, Grudan, 12-Jan-09 10:49 AM, #130
     Reply I don't think this is true..., Elerosse, 12-Jan-09 11:19 AM, #131
     Reply It is true in that, Rayihn, 12-Jan-09 01:20 PM, #134
          Reply Suggestion, Mekantos, 12-Jan-09 01:41 PM, #135
               Reply I don't see that happening, Rayihn, 12-Jan-09 03:16 PM, #136
                    Reply Er..., Mekantos, 12-Jan-09 03:38 PM, #137
                         Reply I like this idea.., Elerosse, 12-Jan-09 04:00 PM, #138
     Reply RE: I agree, this is really disheartening to me., incognito, 12-Jan-09 04:08 PM, #139
Reply I have solved the ABS problem: Master Plan, Adhelard, 09-Jan-09 07:30 PM, #93
Reply At some point the abs system did work like this., Kadsuane, 09-Jan-09 07:40 PM, #94
Reply Yep, and that's why B's system won't work. NT, TheLastMohican, 09-Jan-09 07:48 PM, #96
Reply Yeh I remember this..., Lightmage, 09-Jan-09 07:52 PM, #97
Reply Well, is that a problem?, Adhelard, 09-Jan-09 08:08 PM, #99
     Reply One problem, I don't need pimp gear at hero to compete ..., TheLastMohican, 10-Jan-09 08:26 PM, #116
          Reply RE: One problem, I don't need pimp gear at hero to comp..., Daevryn, 10-Jan-09 10:54 PM, #117
               Reply I think it must be this part:, Mekantos, 11-Jan-09 02:40 PM, #120
               Reply That was what I understood the point of this change to ..., Linolaques, 11-Jan-09 05:54 PM, #123
               Reply Heh., TheLastMohican, 12-Jan-09 04:40 AM, #128
Reply Game., Dallevian, 10-Jan-09 12:12 AM, #102
Reply Even more sick., Dallevian, 10-Jan-09 12:19 AM, #103
Reply They would also need to be locatable..., Tac, 10-Jan-09 12:33 AM, #104
Reply Thieves would rule over all mages, Mekantos, 10-Jan-09 01:01 AM, #105
Reply AND!, Mekantos, 10-Jan-09 01:11 AM, #108
     Reply As for thieves.., Adhelard, 10-Jan-09 05:38 PM, #115
Reply Very cool idea. nt, Drokk, 10-Jan-09 09:23 AM, #111
Reply RE: Sleek Aura/Barrier/Shield Wands, Isildur, 09-Jan-09 03:22 PM, #78
Reply RE: Sleek Aura/Barrier/Shield Wands, Daevryn, 09-Jan-09 03:39 PM, #79
     Reply But, but...!, Straklaw, 09-Jan-09 06:18 PM, #88
          Reply Well, Mekantos, 10-Jan-09 01:14 AM, #109
Reply My suggestion, incognito, 09-Jan-09 02:08 PM, #71
Reply You know what i find funny?, Iza, 09-Jan-09 01:28 PM, #69
Reply RE: You know what i find funny?, Isildur, 09-Jan-09 03:06 PM, #75
Reply Revamping the Wand System, Zephon, 09-Jan-09 07:34 AM, #63
Reply You guys cure symptoms, Dwoggurd, 08-Jan-09 01:22 PM, #56
Reply Exactly how this is going to play out txt, Larcat, 07-Jan-09 06:49 PM, #42
Reply RE: Exactly how this is going to play out txt, Daevryn, 07-Jan-09 07:09 PM, #43
Reply RE: Sleek Aura/Barrier/Shield Wands, The Heretic, 07-Jan-09 01:11 PM, #35
Reply They will, but, Rayihn, 07-Jan-09 01:13 PM, #36
     Reply Here's something I don't grasp, Mekantos, 07-Jan-09 03:37 PM, #37
          Reply RE: Here's something I don't grasp, Rayihn, 07-Jan-09 03:47 PM, #38
               Reply But the problem..., Java, 07-Jan-09 06:49 PM, #39
               Reply If you really think it will last for a few years... txt, Larcat, 07-Jan-09 06:49 PM, #40
               Reply Prove it!, Iza, 07-Jan-09 06:49 PM, #41
               Reply Can I have some more purple crack please., Lightmage, 07-Jan-09 08:32 PM, #44
               Reply When you say ABS.., Adhelard, 07-Jan-09 09:35 PM, #46
               Reply I would say..., EXB, 08-Jan-09 07:18 AM, #47
               Reply Clarification, Lightmage, 08-Jan-09 07:18 AM, #48
               Reply RE: Clarification, Daevryn, 08-Jan-09 08:51 AM, #53
               Reply RE: Clarification, Eskelian, 21-Jan-09 01:50 AM, #147
               Reply re: Battle Berserker Sword Spec v. shapeshifter, Quixotic, 08-Jan-09 10:52 AM, #55
               Reply RE: Clarification, Adhelard, 08-Jan-09 01:22 PM, #57
                    Reply 75 pk wins with 25 losses at hero. (text), Lightmage, 08-Jan-09 10:04 PM, #58
                         Reply RE: 75 pk wins with 25 losses at hero. (text), Daevryn, 08-Jan-09 10:35 PM, #59
                         Reply I hear you..., Lightmage, 09-Jan-09 07:34 AM, #61
                         Reply There's a level 42 one that's in more than not. Surpri..., TheLastMohican, 09-Jan-09 02:08 PM, #72
                         Reply Everytime I do this with mages I still die., TheLastMohican, 09-Jan-09 07:34 AM, #62
                         Reply RE: 75 pk wins with 25 losses at hero. (text), Mekantos, 09-Jan-09 07:34 AM, #65
                              Reply RE: 75 pk wins with 25 losses at hero. (text), Kadsuane, 09-Jan-09 11:17 AM, #68
                                   Reply You can thank..., Mekantos, 09-Jan-09 03:49 PM, #81
                                        Reply I never fought you without barrier, elmeri_, 09-Jan-09 08:29 PM, #100
                                             Reply Huh?, Mekantos, 10-Jan-09 01:03 AM, #106
                         Reply You're kidding?, Adhelard, 09-Jan-09 07:34 AM, #64
                              Reply Well..., Lightmage, 09-Jan-09 11:17 AM, #67
                                   Reply That's a problem to look at that way, Elerosse, 09-Jan-09 01:28 PM, #70
                                        Reply RE: That's a problem to look at that way, Isildur, 09-Jan-09 03:20 PM, #77
                                        Reply RE: That's a problem to look at that way, Elerosse, 09-Jan-09 05:09 PM, #86
                                        Reply RE: That's a problem to look at that way, Eskelian, 21-Jan-09 02:10 AM, #149
                                             Reply I thought you could read.~, Elerosse, 21-Jan-09 08:50 AM, #152
               Reply RE: When you say ABS.., The Heretic, 08-Jan-09 07:18 AM, #49
                    Reply RE: When you say ABS.., Daevryn, 08-Jan-09 08:39 AM, #52
                    Reply Assuming equal talent, you're wrong., TheLastMohican, 09-Jan-09 02:08 PM, #73
               Reply I think you just got trolled by an imm~, Enbuergo1, 09-Jan-09 07:34 AM, #60
               Reply RE: Can I have some more purple crack please., Isildur, 09-Jan-09 03:09 PM, #76
               Reply RE: Here's something I don't grasp, Grudan, 08-Jan-09 10:52 AM, #54
               Reply Coveting Sleeks, Neltouda, 09-Jan-09 07:34 AM, #66
               Reply Were either of you even around when sleeks were rare an..., Lhydia, 09-Jan-09 02:21 PM, #74
               Reply Sorry, but that's not right at all, Mekantos, 09-Jan-09 03:48 PM, #80
                    Reply RE: Sorry, but that's not right at all, Adhelard, 09-Jan-09 04:25 PM, #82
                    Reply But you are forgetting (ALSO: addressing another point), Mekantos, 09-Jan-09 04:42 PM, #83
                    Reply You don't think..., Adhelard, 09-Jan-09 06:54 PM, #91
                         Reply As a hero, Mekantos, 10-Jan-09 01:07 AM, #107
                    Reply And, Mekantos, 09-Jan-09 04:48 PM, #84
                    Reply RE: Sorry, but that's not right at all, Isildur, 09-Jan-09 05:04 PM, #85
                         Reply "upper echelons" and my Genius Plan, Adhelard, 09-Jan-09 06:48 PM, #90
                         Reply But then Satebos grabs all five and no other mage sees ..., TheLastMohican, 09-Jan-09 07:46 PM, #95
                         Reply Thanks for the nod., Nivek1, 09-Jan-09 07:00 PM, #92
                              Reply It's the build you pick, elmeri_, 09-Jan-09 08:03 PM, #98
                              Reply Does anyone have a problem with..., Mekantos, 10-Jan-09 01:17 AM, #110
                    Reply Mage vs. Warriors, Straklaw, 09-Jan-09 06:16 PM, #87
                         Reply I've been thinking about that same thing.., Elerosse, 09-Jan-09 06:45 PM, #89
               Reply RE: Here's something I don't grasp, Eskelian, 21-Jan-09 01:27 AM, #146
                    Reply Right on. (text), Lightmage, 21-Jan-09 06:48 PM, #153
                    Reply And the PK losses?, Adhelard, 21-Jan-09 08:14 PM, #154
                         Reply A few times. Maybe 2 or 3 times in last 6 years or so...., Lightmage, 21-Jan-09 08:39 PM, #156
                              Reply Clarification...(small text), Lightmage, 21-Jan-09 08:41 PM, #157
                    Reply RE: Here's something I don't grasp, Adhelard, 21-Jan-09 08:10 PM, #155
Reply Am I retarded, or did people miss these parts?, TheLastMohican, 07-Jan-09 12:51 AM, #31
Reply RE: Am I retarded, or did people miss these parts?, Rayihn, 07-Jan-09 07:25 AM, #33
     Reply Yeah, realized this a bit after I posted, heh. NT, TheLastMohican, 07-Jan-09 01:11 PM, #34
Reply My thoughts, Narissa, 06-Jan-09 09:52 PM, #30
Reply Well..., Iza, 05-Jan-09 08:58 PM, #20
Reply RE: Well..., Daevryn, 05-Jan-09 10:03 PM, #26
Reply RE: Well..., Iza, 06-Jan-09 12:48 AM, #27
Reply RE: Well..., Klaak, 06-Jan-09 12:27 PM, #28
Reply What was the intended effect?, Larcat, 05-Jan-09 03:47 PM, #15
Reply RE: What was the intended effect?, Daevryn, 05-Jan-09 03:54 PM, #16
     Reply RE: What was the intended effect?, Kadsuane, 05-Jan-09 04:14 PM, #17
          Reply Exactly txt, Larcat, 05-Jan-09 04:49 PM, #18
          Reply Well..., Twist, 05-Jan-09 08:17 PM, #21
               Reply RE: Well..., Grudan, 05-Jan-09 08:58 PM, #22
               Reply I hear ya..., Lightmage, 05-Jan-09 08:58 PM, #23
               Reply RE: I hear ya..., svarog, 08-Jan-09 07:18 AM, #50
                    Reply Sorry, I meant...., Lightmage, 08-Jan-09 10:52 AM, #51
               Reply So does that make the game more fun?, Enbuergo1, 05-Jan-09 08:58 PM, #25
               Reply RE: Well..., Xanthrailles, 06-Jan-09 09:52 PM, #29
                    Reply Did you reply to the right post?, Twist, 07-Jan-09 12:36 AM, #32
                         Reply RE: Did you reply to the right post?, Xanthrailles, 07-Jan-09 08:32 PM, #45
          Reply RE: What was the intended effect?, Daevryn, 05-Jan-09 06:32 PM, #19
Reply Thanks very much for this., GinGa, 05-Jan-09 03:04 PM, #14
Reply Detect Artifact?, Pendragon_Surtr, 05-Jan-09 12:56 PM, #9
Reply Try the helpfile..., Zulghinlour, 05-Jan-09 01:00 PM, #10
Reply Addition to the helpfile., Lightmage, 05-Jan-09 01:22 PM, #11
Reply Detect artifact change, Abernyte, 05-Jan-09 07:25 AM, #7
Reply RE: Detect artifact change, Grudan, 05-Jan-09 01:22 PM, #12
Reply Perhaps somewhat differently, incognito, 05-Jan-09 02:21 PM, #13
Reply Personally, I'm not interested in lowering detect artif..., Zulghinlour, 05-Jan-09 08:57 PM, #24
Reply Is it still txt, Larcat, 05-Jan-09 07:25 AM, #6
Reply RE: Is it still txt, Rayihn, 05-Jan-09 07:32 AM, #8
Reply Quick question., Lightmage, 05-Jan-09 12:36 AM, #2
Reply RE: Quick question., Zulghinlour, 05-Jan-09 12:38 AM, #3
     Reply RE: Quick question., Jhishesh, 05-Jan-09 01:17 AM, #4
          Reply RE: Quick question., Daevryn, 05-Jan-09 01:19 AM, #5
Reply This could be good, great or completely make me give up..., Kadsuane, 05-Jan-09 12:36 AM, #1
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23184 Previous topic | Next topic