not sure if that was ment for show or not.. but

The knock out edge, has been deemd "completely a waste of edgepoints" as in it didnt do nearly anything in the way of stopping jacking but that is just what alot people say, I have no idea having never taken it.

As for the anti-striking edge I would assume that its high point value ? but even if it is, It is designed to work against something that a very very small % of people have, so by your theory it should work good against those % lets say 1 out of every 10 people in your pk has it just for arguement sake.

so it should work really well if your going to spend the points cus your only picking it for that one person really...

now take it form the other side... your spending a LEGACY 1 of 2 for the most part on a skill that is supposed to help you agains only people in your pk... with current counts maybe there is 10-15 people in your pk at all times

out of all the things your guna fight all the time, and the weight of a legacy against the weight of an edge I just dont see that rule being fair....

someone chooses a major building block of there char (legacy) and you negate it (or nearly negate it) by choosing something that you can essentially earn by bartering enough or buying enough heals from the healer in galadon...

and its available to everyone in the game to negate your legacy with not much effort (some effort but not really at hero to build up some #### to get that edge)

but I am curious as to your thoughts on this. I mean I could be misunderstanding what your saying or just wrong about my line of thought.

Thanks